Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improving the Perceived Utility Value of Teamwork and Collaboration among STEM Undergraduates

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teamwork and collaboration are twenty-first century skills valued by STEM employers for addressing the most urgent problems in society. To prepare undergraduate STEM students, they must graduate valuing teamwork and collaboration. The Integrated Concentration in STEM (iCons) program aims to meet this goal by utilizing interdisciplinary team-based learning to address complex real-world problems. In doing so, the program provides students with a learning experience that demonstrates the authentic value of teamwork and shows how collaboration can be useful for solving problems. The purpose of this study was to examine whether students who participated in iCons developed more positive values related to teamwork and collaboration than similar students who did not participate in the program. Framed by Expectancy Value Theory (EVT)—specifically the concept of utility value, which is how practically useful students find teams in helping them fulfill their objectives or to solve problems—we investigated the iCons program with a mixed methods design that analyzed survey and interview data from students. Overall, iCons had a positive effect on students’ perceptions of the utility value of teamwork and collaboration. Qualitative results helped to explain these findings in more depth, including students’ positive perceptions of the interdisciplinary design of the program. Findings suggest that more resources should be put into creating and expanding opportunities in STEM that utilize a combination of pedagogical strategies focused on team-based learning and an interdisciplinary design. Further research is needed to understand these effects in more detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because participants could possibly be identified from the data. De-identified data may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Andersen, L., & Ward, T. J. (2014). Expectancy-value models for the STEM persistence plans of ninth-grade, high-ability students: A comparison between Black, Hispanic, and white students. Science Education, 98(2), 216–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J., Read, J., Linder, B., & Neeley, L. (2021). Interdisciplinary team-based learning: An integrated opportunity recognition and evaluation model for teaching business, engineering and design students. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 4(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127420979190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedwell, W. L., Wildman, J. L., DiazGranados, D., Salazar, M., Kramer, W. S., & Salas, E. (2012). Collaboration at work: An integrative multilevel conceptualization. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belge Can, H., & Boz, Y. (2016). Structuring cooperative learning for motivation and conceptual change in the concepts of mixtures. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9602-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, G. M., Wells, R. S., Auerbach, S. M., Fermann, J. T., & Kimball, E. (2023). How STEM undergraduates choose, navigate, and integrate interdisciplinarity in college and beyond. The Journal of Higher Education, 94(2), 174–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2022.2131964

  • Boix Mansilla, V., & Dawes Duraisingh, E. (2007). Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2007.0008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookhart, M. A., Schneeweiss, S., Rothman, K. J., Glynn, R. J., Avorn, J., & Stürmer, T. (2006). Variable selection for propensity score models. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163(12), 1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A., Haq, I., Bleasel, J., Roberts, C., Garsia, R., Randal, N., & Mellis, C. (2019). Team-based learning (TBL): A community of practice. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 369. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1795-4

  • Burgess, A., Kalman, E., Haq, I., Leaver, A., Roberts, C., & Bleasel, J. (2020). Interprofessional team-based learning (TBL): How do students engage? BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02024-5

  • Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2011). A constructivist grounded theory analysis of losing and regaining a valued self. In F. J. Werts, K. Charmaz, L. M. McMullen, R. Josselson, R. Anderson, & E. McSpadden (Eds.), Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry (pp. 165–204). Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. SAGE.

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A. (2012). The effect of cooperative learning strategies on elementary students’ science achievement and social skills in Kuwait. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9293-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. Model of achievement-related choices. In C. S. Dweck & A. J. Elliot (Eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 105–121). Guilford Press

  • Eccles, J. (2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411398185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). W. H. Freeman.

  • Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., Hernandez, P. R., & Schultz, P. W. (2011). Toward a model of social influence that explains minority student integration into the scientific community. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eymur, G., & Geban, Ö. (2017). The collaboration of cooperative learning and conceptual change: Enhancing the students’ understanding of chemical bonding concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9716-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, S. M. (2008). Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: How the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Research, 39(3), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408317797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frame, T. R., Cailor, S. M., Gryka, R. J., Chen, A. M., Kiersma, M. E., & Sheppard, L. (2015). Student perceptions of team-based learning vs traditional lecture-based learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(4), 51. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe79451

  • Gallegos, P. J., & Peeters, J. M. (2011). A measure of teamwork perceptions for team-based learning. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2010.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greetham, M., & Ippolito, K. (2018). Instilling collaborative and reflective practice in engineers: Using a team-based learning strategy to prepare students for working in project teams. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(V2), 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1468224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd). John Wiley & Sons

  • Ha, H., & Kim, H.-B. (2021). Framing oneself and one another as collaborative contributors in small group argumentation in a science classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(3), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10071-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirano, K., & Imbens, G. W. (2001). Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: An application to data on right heart catheterization. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3–4), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020371312283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holley, K. A. (2009). Interdisciplinary strategies as transformative change in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 34(5), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-009-9121-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilty, T. J., & Burrows, A. C. (2022). Integrated STEM and partnerships: What to do for more effective teams in informal settings. Education Sciences, 12(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010058

  • Lattuca, L. R., Voigt, L. J., & Fath, K. Q. (2004). Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? Theoretical support and researchable questions. The Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2004.0028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawford, G. R. (2003). Beyond success: Achieving synergy in teamwork. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 26(3), 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, P. M., Nagel, J. K., & Lewis, E. J. (2017). Student learning outcomes from a pilot medical innovations course with nursing, engineering, and biology undergraduate students. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0095-y

  • Marbach-Ad, G., Hunt, C., & Thompson, K. V. (2019). Exploring the values undergraduate students attribute to cross-disciplinary skills needed for the workplace: An analysis of five stem disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 452–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09778-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2017). A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology: Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons

  • Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2011). Team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128, 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra, S., Stokols, D., & Cheng, L. (2015). The transdisciplinary orientation scale: Factor structure and relation to the integrative quality and scope of scientific publications. Journal of Translational Medicine and Epidemiology, 3(2), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2015). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press

  • Najdanovic-Visak, V. (2017). Team-based learning for first year engineering students. Education for Chemical Engineers, 18, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2016.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences. (2014). Convergence: Facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond. National Academies Press.

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Promising practices for strengthening the regional stem workforce development ecosystem. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21894

  • National Science Foundation. (2022). Growing convergence research. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/big_ideas/convergent.jsp

  • Ng, M., & Newpher, T. M. (2020). Comparing active learning to team-based learning in undergraduate neuroscience. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 18(2), A102–A111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmelee, D. X., DeStephen, D., & Borges, N. J. (2009). Medical students’ attitudes about team-based learning in a pre-clinical curriculum. Medical Education Online, 14(1), 4503. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v14i.4503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penprase, B. E. (2020). STEM Education for the 21st Century. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Purington, S., & Nieswandt, M. (2022). Integrated concentration in science: An interdisciplinary problem-solving program. Journal of College Science Teaching, 51(3). https://www.nsta.org/journal-college-science-teaching/journal-college-science-teaching-januaryfebruary-2022/integrated

  • Rubin, D. B. (2001). Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020363010465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, J., & Parmelee, D. X. (2008). Knowledge is no longer enough: Enhancing professional education with team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2008(116), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasa, K., Taggar, S., & Seijts, G. H. (2007). The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, L., Ho, S., & Brookes, R. H. (2018). Student perceptions of teamwork within assessment tasks in undergraduate science degrees. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 786–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zha, S., Wu, S., & Estis, J. M. (2021). Using team-based learning to promote engineering students’ performance and self-efficacy in a technical writing class. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(4), 456–467. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2021.3110619

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors acknowledge generous support from the Mahoney Family Sponsorship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01002, USA

    Ryan S. Wells, Ling Chen, Betty Annan, Scott M. Auerbach & Justin T. Fermann

  2. University of Maine, Orono, ME, 04469, USA

    Ezekiel Kimball

Authors
  1. Ryan S. Wells
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ling Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ezekiel Kimball
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Betty Annan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Scott M. Auerbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Justin T. Fermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan S. Wells.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The University of Massachusetts Amherst Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved all aspects of the project.

Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Participants also consented to publishing findings with their data, including quotations.

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 317 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wells, R.S., Chen, L., Kimball, E. et al. Improving the Perceived Utility Value of Teamwork and Collaboration among STEM Undergraduates. Int J of Sci and Math Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10471-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10471-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation