Skip to main content
Log in

Problem-Solving in Biology Teaching: Students’ Activities and Their Achievement

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Problem-solving is, by nature, a creative process which, by teaching through the implementation of research and discovery activities, allows students to create their knowledge, revise it and link it to broader systems. The aim of the research was to describe and analyse the process of solving biological problems through activities that are performed during the process of solving them, as well as to study how the implementation of these activities affects the level and quality of student achievement in biology. This study employed a quantitative method research strategy to describe the problem-solving process in biology teaching and determine student achievement. Data collection was by means of survey and testing. A Likert-scale survey and a biology knowledge test were constructed for the purposes of the research. For data analysis, descriptive statistics, factor analysis and the Pearson correlation coefficient were used. The data of eighth-grade students were collected from September 2016 to February 2017, in 72 schools in Serbia (565 students). The factor analysis confirmed that problem-solving activities could be grouped into the following five areas: (1) analysing and planning problem-solving; (2) discovering solution(s) to the problem; (3) problem-solving evaluation activities; (4) additional activities involving the discussion of the problem; (5) the degree of student independence in the process of discovering a solution to a problem. The results show that with the increasing frequency of the realisation of the research problem-solving activities, the achievement of students also increases. With regard to achievement quality, a positive but low correlation was found in all three domains—knowledge acquisition, understanding and application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, A. R., Toriman, M. E., & Gasim, M. B. (2014). Academic achievement in biology with suggested solutions in selected secondary schools in Kano State, Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(11), 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications: Sixth Edition. Macmillan.

  • Aryulina, D., & Riyanto, R. (2016). A problem-based learning model in biology education courses to develop inquiry teaching competency of preservice teachers. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 35(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v1i1.8364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonijević, R., & Nikolić, N. (2019). The role of problem-oriented teaching in the process of the development of critical and creative thinking. In V. Orlović Lovren, J. Peeters & N. Matović (Eds.), Quality of education: Global development goals and local strategies (pp. 49–63). Institute for Pedagogy and Andragogy.

  • Bowden, E. M. (1997). The effect of reportable and unreportable hints on anagram solution and the Aha! experience. Consciousness & Cognition, 6(4), 545–573. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1997.0325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J., Goodnow, J., & Austin, A. (1956). A study of thinking. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., & Brook, M. (2006). Looking back in problem-solving. Mathematics Teaching, 196, 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C., & Chia, L. G. (2006). Problem-based learning: Using ill-structured problems in biology project work. Science Education, 90(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20097

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, V., & Sarmento, R. P (2019). Confirmatory factor analysis–A case study. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1905/1905.05598.pdf

  • DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, J. C. (2005). Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etherington, M. B. (2011). Investigative primary science: A problem-based learning approach. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(9), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.3316/ielapa.328484780726539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). HarperCollins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gbore, L. O., & Daramola, C. A. (2013). Relative contributions of selected teachers’ variables and students’ attitudes toward academic achievement in biology among senior secondary schools students in Ondo State. Nigeria. Current Issues in Education, 16(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harun, N. G., Yusof, K. H., Jamaludin, M. Z., Helmi, S. A., & Hassan, S. (2012). Motivation in problem-based learning implementation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56(2012), 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskinson, A. M., Caballero, M. D., & Knight, J. K. (2013). How can we improve problem-solving in undergraduate biology? Applying lessons from 30 years of physics education research. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 153–161.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, R. W., & Milkent, M. M. (1996). Facilitating successful prediction problem-solving in biology through application of skill theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 541–552.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamari, D., Mohamed, H., Abdullah, Z., Mohd Zaid, N., & Aris, B. (2018). Biology problem-solving: The high achiever students. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 68, 831–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapa, E. (2001). A metacognitive support during the process of problem solving in a computerized environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(3), 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirui, J. M., & Kaluyu, V. (2018). Influence of selected psychosocial factors on learners’ performance in science subjects: A case of public secondary schools in Moyale Sub-County, Kenya. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(1), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolber, B. J. (2011). Extended problem-based learning improves scientific communication in senior biology students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(1), 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiring, S. P. (1980). Problem solving. A basic mathematics goal, parts 1 and 2. GLC Publishers, Agincourt.

  • Montague, M. (2005). Math problem solving for upper elementary students with disabilities (p. 8). The Access Center: Improving Outcomes for All Students K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H. (2010). Understanding undergraduates’ problem-solving processes. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 11(2), 119–122. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v11i2.203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okoye, N. S., & Okechukwu, R. N. (2006). The effect of concept mapping and problem-solving teaching strategies on achievement in genetics among Nigerian Secondary School Students. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 4, 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

  • Ranjanie, B. (2017). Impact of problem-based learning on teaching biology for higher secondary students. International Journal of Current Research, 9(12), 62932–62934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabella, M. S., & Redish, E. F. (2007). Knowledge organization and activation in physics problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 75(11), 1017–1029.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, J. E., Estabrooks, C. A., Newburn-Cook, C. V., & Gierl, M. (2011). Validation of the conceptual research utilization scale: An application of the standards for educational and psychological testing in healthcare. BMC Health Services Research, 11(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanisavljević, J. D., & Đurić, D. Z. (2012). Efekat primene problemske nastave biologije na trajnost i kvalitet stečenih znanja [The effect of the application of problem-based biology teaching on the durability and quality of acquired knowledge]. Uzdanica, 9(1), 303–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, O. (2006). Improving achievement through problem-based learning. Journal of Biological Education, 40(4), 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syafii, W., & Yasin, M. R. (2013). Problem-solving skills and learning achievements through problem-based module in teaching and learning biology in high school. Asian Social Science, 9(12), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n12p220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, P., & Dutt, S. (2017). Problem-based learning in biology: Its effect on achievement motivation of students of 9th standard. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Education and Research, 2(2), 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trauth Nare, A., Buck, G., & Beeman-Cadwallader, N. (2016). Promoting student agency in scientific inquiry: A self-study of relational pedagogical practices in science teacher education. In G. Buck & V. Akerson (Eds). Allowing our professional knowledge of pre-service science teacher education to be enhanced by self-study research: Turning a critical eye on our practice (pp. 43–67). Springer.

  • Woolfolk, A., Hughes, M., and Walkup, V. (2013). Psychology in Education (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

  • Xun, G., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504836

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nataša Nikolić.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikolić, N., Antonijević, R. Problem-Solving in Biology Teaching: Students’ Activities and Their Achievement. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 22, 765–785 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10407-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10407-5

Keywords

Navigation