Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Developing and Using Physical Dynamic Models On Socioscientific Issues to Present Nature Of Science Ideas

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Raising scientifically literate citizens has been the main concern of the science education community. Socioscientific issues (SSIs) provide a context to facilitate individuals to expand their epistemic understanding and develop scientific reasoning skills such as evidence-based argumentation and consensus building. In this qualitative research, we examined how preservice middle school science teachers (PSTs) embedded the nature of science (NOS) aspects via physical dynamic models (PDM) that they developed on SSIs. We specifically focused on how PSTs scientifically explained the SSIs in their PDMs by explicitly incorporating and reflecting on the NOS aspects. Slightly more than half of the groups succeeded in developing models with dynamic/functional feature that enabled their classmates to predict, hypothesize, test, observe, infer, and generate an explanation of the SSI during presentations. Almost half of the PSTs could not differentiate between demonstration and functional/dynamic models. We additionally used the VNOS-C questionnaire to assess PSTs’ NOS understanding at the beginning and end of the semester. The VNOS-C results showed that PSTs improved on all NOS aspects at the end of the semester. However, among seven NOS aspects that we focused on in our study, creativity and imagination, empirical evidence, and inferential reasoning were explicitly used in PSTs’ presentations of SSI using PDMs. Their presentations did not address subjectivity, tentativeness, social and cultural influence, and theory and law aspects. We recommend replicating this study in different science contexts. Integrating NOS aspects into physical dynamic models needs to be further investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:43.0.CO;2-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V., Nargund-Joshi, V., Weiland, I., Pongsanon, K., & Avsar, B. (2014). What third-grade students of differing ability levels learn about nature of science after a year of instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 244–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.761365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Avsar Erumit, B., & Elcan Kaynak, N. (2019a). Teaching Nature of Science through children’s literature: An early childhood preservice teacher study. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2765–2787. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1698785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Elcan Kaynak, N., & Avsar Erumit, B. (2019b). Development of third graders' identities as “persons who understand nature of science” through a gravity unit. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(2), 450–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atasoy, Ş. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam alanlarına göre yerel sosyobilimsel konularla ilgili informal muhakemeleri [Informal reasoning of preservice teachers about local socioscientific issues]. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 6(1), 60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atasoy, Ş., Tekbıyık, A., & Yüca, O. Ş. (2019). Karadeniz Bölgesi’ndeki bazı yerel sosyobilimsel konularda öğrencilerin informal muhakemelerinin belirlenmesi: HES, organik çay ve yeşil yol projesi [Examining students’ informal reasoning about local socioscientific issues in the Blacksea region: HES, organic tea, and greenway project]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(2), 524–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avsar Erumit, B., & Akerson, V. L. (2022). Using children’s literature in the middle school science class to teach nature of science. Science & Education, 31(3), 713–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00274-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avsar Erumit, B., Fouad, K. E., & Akerson, V. L. (2019). How do learner-directed scientific investigations influence students’ questioning and their nature of science conceptions? International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(1), 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). The virtual solar system project: Student modeling of the solar system. The Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(5), 300–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulter, C. J., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Constructing a typology of models for science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 41–57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Buisine, S., Vandendriessche, C., Glaveanu, V., & Lubart, T. (2017). Engineering students’ use of creativity and development tools in conceptual product design: What, when and how? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, B. C. (2000). Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 895–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, B. C., & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Investigating the role of representations and expressed models in building mental models. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 119–135). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chang Rundgren, S.-N., & Rundgren, C.-J. (2010). SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view of socioscientific issues. Asia-Parcific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (2002). Protocol evidence on thought experiments used by experts. In W. Gray & C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual conference of the cognitive science society (p. 32). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (Ed.) (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Springer.

  • Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). A critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of nature of science. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 205–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00051-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2011). Measuring creativity for innovation management. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(3), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir, A., & Namdar, B. (2021). The effect of modeling activities on Grade 5 students’ informal reasoning about a real-life issue. Research in Science Education, 51(Suppl. 1), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09896-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (1998). Towards multi-perspective views of science learning and instruction. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning in science – From behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3–26). Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289–2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eymur, G. (2019). The influence of the explicit nature of science instruction embedded in the argument-driven inquiry method in chemistry laboratories on high school students’ conceptions about the nature of science. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00135A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichsen, P., Sadler, T., Graham, K., & Brown, P. (2016). Design of a socio-scientific issue curriculum unit: Antibiotic resistance, natural selection, and modeling. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 7(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (Eds.). (2000). Developing models in science education. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobert, J. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Modelling in science lessons: Are there better ways to learn with models? School Science and Mathematics, 98(8), 420–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17434.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, A. M., & Gilbert, J. K. (1991). The use of analogue models by students of chemistry at higher education level. International Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., Macalalag Jr., A. Z., & Dunphy, J. (2020). Incorporating socioscientific issues into a STEM education course: Exploring teacher use of argumentation in SSI and plans for classroom implementation. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 2(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-020-00026-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karisan, D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Contextualization of nature of science within the socioscientific issues framework: A review of research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.270186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues. Science & Education, 30(3), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R. (2012a). Nature of science and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 67–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.559490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R. (2012b). Relationship between nature of science understandings and argumentation skills: A role for counter argument and contextual factors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinskey, M., & Zeidler, D. (2021). Elementary preservice teachers’ challenges in designing and implementing socioscientific issues-based lessons. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1826079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 614–634). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23(2), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Smith, M. U. (2019). Teaching nature of scientific knowledge to kindergarten through University students. Science & Education, 28(3), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00057-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemons, G., Carberry, A., Swan, C., Jarvin, L., & Rogers, C. (2010). The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design. Design Studies, 31(3), 288–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, J. S. C. (2020). Students’ adherences to epistemic understanding in evaluating scientific claims. Science Education, 104(2), 164–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, J. S. C. (2022). A practice-based approach to learning nature of science through socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09942-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Modeling-based learning in science education: Cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions. Educational Review, 64(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.628748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling-based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802538045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, B. K., & Bell, R. L. (2017). Making learning last: Teachers’ long-term retention of improved nature of science conceptions and instructional rationales. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 62–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1267879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N. J. (1999). Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. In Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 5–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2019). Learning Compass 2030. Retrieved April 12, 2022, from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/

  • Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Controversial issues in the science classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(4), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717745544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Rresearch, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peel, A., Zangori, L., Friedrichsen, P., Hayes, E., & Sadler, T. (2019). Students’ model-based explanations about natural selection and antibiotic resistance through socio-scientific issues-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1564084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivet, A. E., & Kastens, K. A. (2012). Developing a construct-based assessment to examine students’ analogical reasoning around physical models in Earth Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 713–743. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 1–9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Friedrichsen, P., & Zangori, L. (2019). A framework for teaching for socio-scientific issue and model based learning (SIMBL). Educação e Fronteiras/Education and Borders, 9(25), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.30612/eduf.v9i25.11006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seel, N. M. (2017). Model-based learning: A synthesis of theory and research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 931–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9507-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sensevy, G., Tiberghien, A., Santini, J., Laubé, S., & Griggs, P. (2008). An epistemological approach to modeling: Cases studies and implications for science teaching. Science Studies and Science Education, 92(3), 424–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, X. (2021). Using explicit teaching of philosophy to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & Education, 30(2), 409–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00173-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Secondary students’ dynamic modeling processes: Analyzing, reasoning about, synthesizing, and testing models of stream ecosystems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021840407112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Brunner, J. (2020). Evidence and rationale for expanding the views of nature of science questionnaire. Teaching, Leadership & Professional Practice Faculty Publications, 7 https://commons.und.edu/tlpp-fac/7

  • Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2001). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 815–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, B. Y., Collins, A., & Frederiksen, J. R. (2011). The nature of scientific meta-knowledge. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), Models and modeling: Cognitive tools for scientific enquiry (pp. 41–76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0449-7_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangori, L., Peel, A., Kinslow, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Sadler, T. D. (2017). Student development of model-based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio-scientific issues unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 697–796). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Social and ethical issues in science education: A prelude to action. Science & Education, 17(8), 799–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9130-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L., Applebaum, S. M., & Sadler, T. D. (2011). Enacting a socioscientific issues classroom: Transformative transformations. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (pp. 277–305). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey

    Banu Avsar Erumit & Tugba Yuksel

Authors
  1. Banu Avsar Erumit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tugba Yuksel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Banu Avsar Erumit.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avsar Erumit, B., Yuksel, T. Developing and Using Physical Dynamic Models On Socioscientific Issues to Present Nature Of Science Ideas. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 21, 1031–1056 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10296-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10296-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation