Skip to main content
Log in

Teacher Learning Through Collaboration Between Teachers and Researchers: a Case Study in China

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate teachers’ learning through researcher–teacher partnerships (RTPs). The theoretical framework, developed by Bannister, was applied to examine teacher learning in RTPs. Specifically, a case study of an RTP was conducted, in which university researchers collaborated closely with mathematics teachers. The data—including audio recordings of lesson-preparing discussions, lesson plans, videotaped lessons, and post-lesson interviews—were collected and analyzed to describe the case. It was found that the identity of the participating teachers changed from “problem posers and solution receivers” to “collaborative problem solvers” in the process of negotiating and finding solutions to practical problems with researchers within the RTP. Moreover, the selected theoretical framework was enriched by the inclusion of enactment and reflection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aubusson, P., Brady, L., & Dinham, S. (2005). Action learning: What works? NSW Department of Education and Training. Retrieved Nov. 18, 2021 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239579444_Action_Learning_What_Works

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, N. A. (2015). Reframing practice: Teacher learning through interactions in a collaborative group. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, N. A. (2018). Theorizing collaborative mathematics teacher learning in communities of practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, L., Mockler, N., & Gore, J. (2018). An Australian view of the academic partner role in schools. Educational Action Research, 26(1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., & Potari, D. (Eds.). (2020). Teachers of mathematics working and learning in collaborative groups. The proceeding of ICMI STUDY 25, Feb. 3–7, 2020. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Retrieved Nov. 18, 2021 from http://icmistudy25.ie.ulisboa.pt/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/201114-ICMI25Proceedings6.13.2020.pdf

  • Chen, X. (2020). Teacher learning in boundary-crossing lesson study. Journal of Educational Studies, 16(2), 47–58. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, E. C. K. (2017). Leveraging knowledge through Communities of Practice. In S. C. Kong, T. K. Wong, M. Yang, C. F. Chow, & K. H. Tse (Eds.), Emerging practices in scholarship of learning and teaching in a digital era (pp. 91–103). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C., Penuel, W., & Geil, K. (2013). Research-practice partnerships: a strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. William T Grant Foundation.

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejar & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 249–305). AERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. (2019). Mathematicians and teachers sharing perspectives on teaching whole number arithmetic: Boundary-crossing in professional development. ZDM, 51(1), 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute.

  • Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expensive learning: Foundation, findings and further challenges. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G., Brandes, G. M., Mitchell, I., & Mitchell, J. (2005). Collaborative teacher learning: Findings from two professional development projects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7), 787–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, C. C., Harrison, C., & Coburn, C. E. (2019). “What the hell is this, and who the hell are you?” Role and identity negotiation in research-practice partnerships. AERA Open, 5(2),1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419849595

  • Gajda, R., & Koliba, C. J. (2008). Evaluating and improving the quality of teacher collaboration: A field-tested framework for secondary school leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 92(2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. (2009). Opening the black box of teacher learning: Shifts in attention. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & C. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 97–104). PME.

  • Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. C. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ learning: A conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(1), 5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, S. (2008). A quest for ‘good’ research. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher Education: The mathematics teacher Educator as a developing professional (Vol. 4, pp. 201–220). Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, S. (2014). Mathematics teaching development: Learning from developmental research in Norway. ZDM, 46(2), 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groundwater-Smith, S., Mitchell, J., Mockler, N., Ponte, P., & Ronnerman, K. (2012). Facilitating Practitioner Research: Developing Transformational Partnerships. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, F., & Gu, L. (2016). Characterizing mathematics teaching research specialists’ mentoring in the context of Chinese lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haneda, M. (2006). Classrooms as communities of practice: A reevaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 807–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 207–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., & Kulm, G. (2012). Prospective middle grade mathematics teachers’ knowledge of algebra for teaching. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., Su, H., & Xu, S. (2014). Developing teachers’ and teaching researchers’ professional competence in mathematics through Chinese Lesson Study. ZDM, 46, 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., Zhang, J., Mok, I., Zhou, Y., Wu, Z., & Zhao, W. (2017). The competence of teaching research specialists and their development in China. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, Special Issue, 6(4), 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., Takahashi, A., & da Ponte, J. (2019). Theory and Practices of Lesson Study in Mathematics: An international perspective. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, K. M. (1985). A successful program of teachers assisting teachers. Educational Leadership, 43(3), 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Baumer, P., & Lichon, K. (2015). Administrators as advocates for teacher collaboration. Intervention in School and Clinic, 51(1), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koichu, B., & Pinto, A. (2018). Developing education research competencies in mathematics teachers through trail: Teacher-researcher alliance for investigating learning. Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics & Technology Education, 18(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19–44). Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Huang, R. (2018). How Chinese teacher acquire and improve mathematics knowledge for teaching. Sense.

  • Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1999). Teacher—Transforming their world and their work. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (2003). Exploring the nature of teacher research. In A. Clarke & G. L. Erickson (Eds.), Teacher Inquiry: Living the Research in Everyday Practice (pp. 181–189). Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, F. (Ed.). (2014). Mathematics (Grade 8 volume two). Beijing Normal University Press. (In Chinese).

  • Martinovic, D. (2012). Doing research was inspiring: Building a research community. Educational Action Research, 20(3), 385-406.

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2020). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/5f07c754-en/index.html?itemId=/content/publication/5f07c754-en&mimeType=text/html

  • Pape, S. J., & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory into Practice, 40(2), 118–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potari, D., Psycharis, G., Sakonidis, C., & Zachariades, T. (2019). Collaborative design of a reform-oriented mathematics curriculum: Contradictions and boundaries across teaching, research, and policy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(3), 417–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, C. ,Cao, C., & Zhang, D. (2021). Promoting teacher learning through collaboration between teachers and researchers: A case study. Journal of Mathematics Education (in Chinese), 3, 38–45.

  • Slavit, D., Kennedy, A., Lean, Z., Nelson, T. H., & Deuel, A. (2011). Support for professional collaboration in middle school mathematics: A complex web. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirotnik, K., & Goodlad, J. (Eds.). (1998). School-university partnerships in action: Concepts, cases, and concerns. Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. G. Tarrow (Eds.), International social movement research (Vol. 1, pp. 197–217). JAI Press.

  • Tseng, V. (2012). Social policy report: The uses of research in policy and practice. Sharing Child and Youth Development Knowledge, 26(2), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, V., Easton, J. Q., & Supplee, L. H. (2017). Research-practice partnerships: Building two-way streets of engagement. Social Policy Report, 30(4), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13–22.

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth, L., Mazzeo, C., & Connolly, F. (2017). Research practice partnerships: A strategy for promoting evidence-based decision-making in education. Educational Research, 59(2), 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., & Qi, C. (2019). Reasoning and proof in eighth-grade mathematics textbooks in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 98(C), 77–90.

  • Zhang, X., & Wong, J. L. (2021). How do teachers perceive their knowledge development through engaging in school-based learning activities? A case study in China. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1–19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunxia Qi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, C., Cao, C. & Huang, R. Teacher Learning Through Collaboration Between Teachers and Researchers: a Case Study in China. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 21, 93–112 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10241-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10241-7

Keywords

Navigation