Abstract
This study aimed to investigate teachers’ learning through researcher–teacher partnerships (RTPs). The theoretical framework, developed by Bannister, was applied to examine teacher learning in RTPs. Specifically, a case study of an RTP was conducted, in which university researchers collaborated closely with mathematics teachers. The data—including audio recordings of lesson-preparing discussions, lesson plans, videotaped lessons, and post-lesson interviews—were collected and analyzed to describe the case. It was found that the identity of the participating teachers changed from “problem posers and solution receivers” to “collaborative problem solvers” in the process of negotiating and finding solutions to practical problems with researchers within the RTP. Moreover, the selected theoretical framework was enriched by the inclusion of enactment and reflection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aubusson, P., Brady, L., & Dinham, S. (2005). Action learning: What works? NSW Department of Education and Training. Retrieved Nov. 18, 2021 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239579444_Action_Learning_What_Works
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Bannister, N. A. (2015). Reframing practice: Teacher learning through interactions in a collaborative group. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 347–372.
Bannister, N. A. (2018). Theorizing collaborative mathematics teacher learning in communities of practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 125–139.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639.
Beveridge, L., Mockler, N., & Gore, J. (2018). An Australian view of the academic partner role in schools. Educational Action Research, 26(1), 25–41.
Borko, H., & Potari, D. (Eds.). (2020). Teachers of mathematics working and learning in collaborative groups. The proceeding of ICMI STUDY 25, Feb. 3–7, 2020. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Retrieved Nov. 18, 2021 from http://icmistudy25.ie.ulisboa.pt/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/201114-ICMI25Proceedings6.13.2020.pdf
Chen, X. (2020). Teacher learning in boundary-crossing lesson study. Journal of Educational Studies, 16(2), 47–58. (In Chinese).
Cheng, E. C. K. (2017). Leveraging knowledge through Communities of Practice. In S. C. Kong, T. K. Wong, M. Yang, C. F. Chow, & K. H. Tse (Eds.), Emerging practices in scholarship of learning and teaching in a digital era (pp. 91–103). Springer.
Coburn, C., Penuel, W., & Geil, K. (2013). Research-practice partnerships: a strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. William T Grant Foundation.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejar & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 249–305). AERA.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Cooper, J. (2019). Mathematicians and teachers sharing perspectives on teaching whole number arithmetic: Boundary-crossing in professional development. ZDM, 51(1), 69–80.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute.
Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expensive learning: Foundation, findings and further challenges. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(1), 1–24.
Erickson, G., Brandes, G. M., Mitchell, I., & Mitchell, J. (2005). Collaborative teacher learning: Findings from two professional development projects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7), 787–798.
Farrell, C. C., Harrison, C., & Coburn, C. E. (2019). “What the hell is this, and who the hell are you?” Role and identity negotiation in research-practice partnerships. AERA Open, 5(2),1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419849595
Gajda, R., & Koliba, C. J. (2008). Evaluating and improving the quality of teacher collaboration: A field-tested framework for secondary school leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 92(2), 133–153.
Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. (2009). Opening the black box of teacher learning: Shifts in attention. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & C. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 97–104). PME.
Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. C. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ learning: A conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(1), 5–36.
Goodchild, S. (2008). A quest for ‘good’ research. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher Education: The mathematics teacher Educator as a developing professional (Vol. 4, pp. 201–220). Sense Publishers.
Goodchild, S. (2014). Mathematics teaching development: Learning from developmental research in Norway. ZDM, 46(2), 305–316.
Groundwater-Smith, S., Mitchell, J., Mockler, N., Ponte, P., & Ronnerman, K. (2012). Facilitating Practitioner Research: Developing Transformational Partnerships. Routledge.
Gu, F., & Gu, L. (2016). Characterizing mathematics teaching research specialists’ mentoring in the context of Chinese lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 441–454.
Haneda, M. (2006). Classrooms as communities of practice: A reevaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 807–817.
Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 207–236.
Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37–79.
Huang, R., & Kulm, G. (2012). Prospective middle grade mathematics teachers’ knowledge of algebra for teaching. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 417–430.
Huang, R., Su, H., & Xu, S. (2014). Developing teachers’ and teaching researchers’ professional competence in mathematics through Chinese Lesson Study. ZDM, 46, 239–251.
Huang, R., Zhang, J., Mok, I., Zhou, Y., Wu, Z., & Zhao, W. (2017). The competence of teaching research specialists and their development in China. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, Special Issue, 6(4), 321–335.
Huang, R., Takahashi, A., & da Ponte, J. (2019). Theory and Practices of Lesson Study in Mathematics: An international perspective. Springer.
Kent, K. M. (1985). A successful program of teachers assisting teachers. Educational Leadership, 43(3), 30–33.
Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Baumer, P., & Lichon, K. (2015). Administrators as advocates for teacher collaboration. Intervention in School and Clinic, 51(1), 51–57.
Koichu, B., & Pinto, A. (2018). Developing education research competencies in mathematics teachers through trail: Teacher-researcher alliance for investigating learning. Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics & Technology Education, 18(1), 1–18.
Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19–44). Greenwood Publishing Group.
Li, Y., & Huang, R. (2018). How Chinese teacher acquire and improve mathematics knowledge for teaching. Sense.
Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591–596.
Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1999). Teacher—Transforming their world and their work. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325–340.
Little, J. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913–945.
Loughran, J. (2003). Exploring the nature of teacher research. In A. Clarke & G. L. Erickson (Eds.), Teacher Inquiry: Living the Research in Everyday Practice (pp. 181–189). Routledge Falmer.
Ma, F. (Ed.). (2014). Mathematics (Grade 8 volume two). Beijing Normal University Press. (In Chinese).
Martinovic, D. (2012). Doing research was inspiring: Building a research community. Educational Action Research, 20(3), 385-406.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2020). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/5f07c754-en/index.html?itemId=/content/publication/5f07c754-en&mimeType=text/html
Pape, S. J., & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory into Practice, 40(2), 118–127.
Potari, D., Psycharis, G., Sakonidis, C., & Zachariades, T. (2019). Collaborative design of a reform-oriented mathematics curriculum: Contradictions and boundaries across teaching, research, and policy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(3), 417–434.
Qi, C. ,Cao, C., & Zhang, D. (2021). Promoting teacher learning through collaboration between teachers and researchers: A case study. Journal of Mathematics Education (in Chinese), 3, 38–45.
Slavit, D., Kennedy, A., Lean, Z., Nelson, T. H., & Deuel, A. (2011). Support for professional collaboration in middle school mathematics: A complex web. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 113–131.
Sirotnik, K., & Goodlad, J. (Eds.). (1998). School-university partnerships in action: Concepts, cases, and concerns. Teachers College Press.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. G. Tarrow (Eds.), International social movement research (Vol. 1, pp. 197–217). JAI Press.
Tseng, V. (2012). Social policy report: The uses of research in policy and practice. Sharing Child and Youth Development Knowledge, 26(2), 3–16.
Tseng, V., Easton, J. Q., & Supplee, L. H. (2017). Research-practice partnerships: Building two-way streets of engagement. Social Policy Report, 30(4), 1–17.
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.
Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13–22.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press.
Wentworth, L., Mazzeo, C., & Connolly, F. (2017). Research practice partnerships: A strategy for promoting evidence-based decision-making in education. Educational Research, 59(2), 241–255.
Zhang, D., & Qi, C. (2019). Reasoning and proof in eighth-grade mathematics textbooks in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 98(C), 77–90.
Zhang, X., & Wong, J. L. (2021). How do teachers perceive their knowledge development through engaging in school-based learning activities? A case study in China. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qi, C., Cao, C. & Huang, R. Teacher Learning Through Collaboration Between Teachers and Researchers: a Case Study in China. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 21, 93–112 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10241-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10241-7