Abstract
Drawing upon constructionism and neo-materialist approaches on the role of physical activity and the human body in teaching and learning mathematics, this paper investigates the meanings constructed by students while collaboratively carrying out tasks focusing on the dynamic aspects of the concept of angle in the educational context of a 6th grade class of a public primary school in Greece. Paying particular attention to the specific material configurations at play, we try to analyse the construction processes through which angle was used both as a measure represented by a number and as a directed turn in the simulated 3D space of a digital tool that combines 3D Turtle Geometry and dynamic manipulation. Following a design-based research method, mathematical meanings are analysed as contingent assemblages involving gestures, embodied metaphors, navigation in virtual spaces, viewpoints, figural representations of 2D and 3D geometrical objects and ways of verbal and symbolic expression.













Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, H., & diSessa, A. (1981). Turtle geometry: The computer as a medium for exploring mathematics. MIT Press.
Abrahamson, D., & Lindgren, R. (2014). Embodiment and embodied design. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 358–376). Cambridge University Press.
Alibali, M., Boncoddo, R. & Hostetter, A. (2014). Gesture in reasoning: An embodied perspective. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 150–159). Routledge.
Ball, L., Drijvers, P., Barzel, B., Cao, Y., & Maschietto, M. (2017). Topic study group no. 42: Uses of technology in lower secondary mathematics education (Age 10–14). In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 577–578). Springer.
Châtelet, G. (2000/1993). Les enjeux du mobile. Paris: Seuil. In R. Shore & M. Zagha (Eds.), Figuring space: Philosophy, mathematics and physics. Kluwer
Clements, D. H., Battista, M. T., Sarama, J., & Swaminathan, S. (1996). Development of turn and turn measurement concepts in a computer-based instructional unit. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 313–337.
Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (1997). Children’s mathematical reasoning with the turtle programming metaphor. In L. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning, analogies, metaphors and images (pp. 313–338). Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
Davis, B. (2015). Spatial reasoning in the early years: Principles, assertions, and speculations. Routledge.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. Cambridge University Press.
de Freitas, E. (2016). Material encounters and media events: What kind of mathematics can a body do? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(2), 185–202.
de Freitas, E., Ferrara, F., & Ferrari, G. (2017). The coordinated movements of a learning assemblage: Secondary school students exploring Wii graphing technology. In E. Faggiano, F. Ferrara, & A. Montone (Eds.), (2017) Innovation and technology enhancing mathematics education (pp. 59–75). Springer.
Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II. Columbia University Press.
Eilam, B., & Alon, U. (2019). Children’s object structure perspective-taking: Training and assessment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 1541–1562.
Ferrara, F., & Ferrari, G. (2017). Agency and assemblage in pattern generalisation: A materialist approach to learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(1), 21–36.
Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Reidel.
Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2019). New materialism. In P. A. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, & M. Williams (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations. Sage.
Gibbs Jr, R. W. (Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press.
Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from the learning design perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 17–51). Routledge.
Harvey, B. (1997). Computer science logo style: Symbolic computing (Vol. 1). MIT press.
Hollebrands, K., Laborde, C., & Strasser, R. (2008). Technology and the learning of geometry at the secondary level. Research Syntheses. In M. K. Heid & G. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology in the learning and teaching of mathematic (Vol. 1, pp. 155–205). Information Age.
Kafai, Y. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children’s learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in a digital world. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
Kontorovich, I. & Zazkis, R. (2016). Turn vs. shape: Teachers cope with incompatible perspectives on angle. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(2), 223–243.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning. The rhetorics of the science classroom. Continuum.
Kynigos, C. (1992). The Turtle metaphor as a tool for children doing geometry. In C. Hoyles & R. Noss (Eds.), Learning logo and mathematics (pp. 97–126). MIT press.
Kynigos, C. (1993). Children’s inductive thinking during intrinsic and euclidean geometrical activities in a computer programming environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 177–197.
Kynigos, C. (1997). Dynamic representations of angle with a Logo-based variation tool: A case study. In M. Turcsanyi-Szabo (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth european logo conference (pp. 104-112). Budapest.
Kynigos, C., Koutlis, M., & Hadzilakos, Th. (1997). Mathematics with component-oriented exploratory software. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 2, 229–250.
Kynigos, C. (2007). Half-baked Logo microworlds as boundary objects in integrated design. Informatics in Education, 6(2), 335–358.
Kynigos, C., & Latsi, M. (2007). Turtle’s navigation and manipulation of geometrical figures constructed by variable processes in a 3D simulated space. Informatics in Education, 6(2), 1–14.
Kynigos, C., Psycharis, G. & Latsi, M. (2009). Meanings for angles through geometrical constructions in 3D space. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 457-464). PME.
Kynigos, C. (2015). Constructionism: Theory of learning or theory of design?. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 417–438). Springer.
Kynigos, C., & Grizioti, M. (2018). Programming approaches to computational thinking: Integrating Turtle Geometry, Dynamic Manipulation and 3D Space. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 321–340.
Laborde, C., Kynigos, C., Hollebrands, K., & Sträßer, R. (2006). Teaching and learning geometry with technology. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 275–304). Sense Publishers.
Lakoff, G. & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books.
Latsi, M., & Kynigos, C. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic perspectives in 3D constructions. In J. Clayson & I. Kallas (Eds.), Constructionism 2010 - Constructionist approaches to creative learning, thinking and education: Lessons for the 21st century.
Latsi, M. & Kynigos, C. (2012). Experiencing 3D simulated space through different perspectives. In A. Jimoyiannis (Ed.), Research on e-Learning and ICT in education(pp. 183–196). Springer Science & Business Media.
Maffia, A. & Sabena C. (2016) Teacher gestures as pivot signs in semiotic chains. In C. Csiskos. A. Rausch & J. Szitanyi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (Vol. 3, pp. 235–242). Szeged, Hungary.
McNeill, D. (Ed.). (2000). Language and gesture. Cambridge University Press.
Mitchelmore, M. C., & White, P. (2000). Development of angle concept by progressive abstraction and generalisation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 209–238.
Morgan, C., & Alshwaikh, J. (2010). Mathematical activity in a multi-semiotic environment. CERME 6–WORKING GROUP 6, 993.
Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Three conjectures concerning the relationship between body activity and understanding mathematics. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (Vo. 1, pp. 103–135). CRDG, College of Education, University of Hawai‘i.
Ng, O. (2019). Examining technology-mediated communication using a commognitive lens: The case of touchscreen-dragging in dynamic geometry environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 1173–1193.
Ng, O., & Ferrara, F. (2020). Towards a materialist vision of ‘learning as making’: The case of 3D printing pens in school mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 925–944.
Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Papadopoulos, I., Diamantidis, D., & Kynigos, C. (2016). Meanings around angle with digital media designed to support creative mathematical thinking. In C. Csiskos, A. Rausch & J. Szitanyi (Eds), Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 35–42). Szeged.
Papert, S. (1980). MindStorms—Children, computers and powerful ideas. The Harvester Press Limited.
Papert, S. (1988). The conservation of Piaget: The computer as grist. Constructivism in the computer age, 3–14.
Papert, S. (2002). The turtle’s long slow trip: Macro-educological perspectives on microworlds. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27(1), 7–27.
Psycharis, G., & Morgan, C. (2012). Networking constructionism and social semiotics in order to investigate students bodily engagement with tasks in three dimensional space. In C. Kynigos, J. Clayson, & N. Yiannoutsou (Eds.), Constructionism: Theory, practice and impact (pp. 510–519). University of Athens: The Educational Technology Lab.
Radford, L. (2009). Signs, gestures, meanings: Elementary algebraic thinking from a cultural semiotic perspective. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, F. Arzarello, & Institut national de recherche pedagogique (France) (Eds.), Sixth Conference of European Research in Mathematics Education.
Reggini, H. C. (1985). Ideas y formas: Explorando el espacio con Logo. Galápago.
Sinclair, N., Bussi, M. G. B., de Villiers, M., Jones, K., Kortenkamp, U., Leung, A., & Owens, K. (2017). Geometry education, including the use of new technologies: A survey of recent research. In G. Kaiser (Ed.) Proceedings of the 13th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 277–287). Springer.
Shapiro, L. (2014). The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. Routledge.
Thompson, G. (Ed.). (2020). The education assemblage. Routledge.
Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 161–193). Ablex Publishing.
Tversky, B. (2005). Functional significance of visuospatial representations. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 1–34). Cambridge University Press.
Wickens, C., Vincow, M., & Yeh, M. (2005). Design applications of visuospatial thinking: The importance of frame of reference. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 383–425). Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Latsi, M., Kynigos, C. Mathematical Assemblages Around Dynamic Aspects of Angle in Digital and Physical Space. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 20, 1677–1698 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10225-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10225-7


