Abstract
Given the importance of cultivating scientific literate societies, the integration of scientific inquiry into school curriculum is key to contemporary science education. It is apparent that textbooks have been an accessible source of science information for teachers and students since the growth of public K-12 schooling worldwide. Textbooks are crucial for understanding the basis of science curriculum, since many science teachers design their courses according to textbook content. This study aimed to determine whether the activities (both experiments and student activities) in Turkish biology textbooks reflect contemporary inquiry-based approaches. To this end, the sample of the study was composed of four biology textbooks approved by the Turkish Ministry of National Education (MoNE) for grades 9–12. Analysis of these textbooks was conducted using the Inquiry-Based Tasks Analysis Inventory (ITAI). The overall findings indicate that activities in textbooks were mostly compatible with the established curriculum, but they were insufficiently designed to prepare students to do inquiry or to understand what scientific inquiry is. Results demonstrated that these textbooks’ most considered ITAI dimension was Construction of Understandings about Scientific Concepts, while the least frequently explored dimension was Understandings about Scientific Inquiry. Additionally, in the Expected skills dimension, observing and inferring were the most frequently used skills.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Belarmino, J. J., Brunner, J. L., Le, A. P., Myers, J. Y., Summers, R. G., . . . Zeineddin, A. A. (2017). A longitudinal analysis of the extent and manner of representations of nature of science in US high school chemistry, biology, and physics textbooks. In C. V. Mcdonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks (pp. 20–60). New York, NY: Routledge.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–855.
Abimbola, I. O., & Baba, S. (1996). Misconceptions & alternative conceptions in science textbooks: The role of teachers as filters. The American Biology Teacher, 58, 14–19.
Akçay, B., & Akçay, H. (2018). Descriptive analysis of diagrammatic representations of Turkish middle school science textbooks. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 9, 193–199.
Akçay, S. (2016). Analysis of analogy use in secondary education science textbooks in Turkey. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(19), 1841–1851.
American American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Arnous, H., & Ayoubi, Z. (2018). Inquiry level of the undergraduate chemistry laboratory manuals in Lebanon. West East Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 13–22.
Asghar, A., Hameed, S., & Farahani, N. K. (2014). Evolution in biology textbooks: A comparative analysis of 5 Muslim countries. Religion & Education, 41(1), 1–15.
Aydemir, S., Ugras, M., Cambay, O., & Kilic, A. (2017). Prospective pre-school teachers’ views on the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Üniversitepark Bülten| Universitepark Bulletin, 6(2), 74–87.
Aydin, S., & Tortumlu, S. (2015). The analysis of the changes in integration of nature of science into Turkish high school chemistry textbooks: Is there any development? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 786–796.
Baykara, H., Yakar, Z., & Liu, S. Y. (2018). Preservice science teachers’ views about scientific inquiry. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(10), 128–143.
Berg, B. L. (2011). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences: International edition. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
BouJaoude, S., Dagher, Z. R., & Refai, S. (2017). The portrayal of nature of science in Lebanese ninth grade science textbooks. In C. V. Mcdonald & F. Abd-El- Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks (pp. 79–97). New York, NY: Routledge.
Brunner, J. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2017). Representations of nature of science in US elementary science trade books. In C. V. Mcdonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks (pp. 135–151). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bryce, N. (2013). Textual features and language demands of primary grade science textbooks: The call for more informational texts in primary grades. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Critical analysis of science textbooks: Evaluating instructional effectiveness (pp. 101–120). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Bybee, R. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrel & E. H. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20–46). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Cakici, Y. (2012). Exploring Turkish upper primary level science textbooks’ coverage of scientific literacy themes. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 81–102.
Cakir, M. (2011). Enhancing Mendelian genetics concepts using a guided computer-mediated inquiry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10(3), 156–167.
Caravita, S., Valente, A., Luzi, D., Pace, P., Valanides, N., Khalil, I., . . . Clement, P. (2008). Construction and validation of textbook analysis grids for ecology and environmental education. Science Education International, 19(2), 97–116.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Fillman, D. A. (2007). Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1847–1868.
Cobern, W. W. (1996). Constructivism and non-western science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 18(3), 295–310.
Concannon, J. P., Brown, P. L., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2020). Investigating the development of secondary students’ views about scientific inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 1–28.
Ders Kitaplari Yonetmeligi [The Statutes of Textbooks]. (2012). Ministry of National Education, Ankara, Turkey.
Dikmenli, M., Cardak, O., & Oztas, F. (2009). Conceptual problems in biology-related topics in primary science and technology textbooks in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(4), 429–440.
Dogan, O. K., Cakir, M., & Yager, R. E. (2017). Delineating the roles of scientific inquiry and argumentation in conceptual change process. Education Research Highlights in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2017, 113.
Fuhrman, M., Novick, S., Lunetta, V., & Tamir, P. (1978). The Laboratory Structure and Task Analysis Inventory (LAI) (Technical report 14). Iowa City, IA: Science Education Center, University of Iowa.
Gaigher, E., Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2014). Knowledge about inquiry: A study in South African high schools. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3125–3147.
Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 475–499.
Gök, T. İ. (2012). Comparative analysis of biology textbooks with regard to cellular respiration and photosynthesis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bilkent University, Turkey.
Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 485–529.
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(3), 407–416.
Irez, S. (2009). Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks. Science Education, 93(3), 422–447.
Irez, S. (2016). Representations of the nature of scientific knowledge in Turkish biology textbooks. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(7), 206–220.
Kahveci, A. (2010). Quantitative analysis of science and chemistry textbooks for indicators of reform: A complementary perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1495–1519.
Kampourakis, K. (2017). Nature of science representations in Greek secondary school biology textbooks. In C. V. Mcdonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of Nature of Science in School Science Textbooks (pp. 118–134). New York, NY: Routledge.
Karatay, R., Timur, S., & Timur, B. (2013). 2005 ve 2013 yılı Fen Dersi Öğretim Programlarının Karşılaştırılması [Comparison of 2005 and 2013 science course curricula]. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(15), 233-264.
Kim, H. N., & Park, D. Y. (2009). Elementary science textbook analysis of Korea and the United States. Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 258–270.
Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014b). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry—The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83.
Lederman, N. G. (2009). Nature of science: Essential teacher knowledge. In The continuum of secondary science teacher preparation (pp. 143–157). Brill Sense.
Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014a). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23(2), 285–302.
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2012). Nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry: Building instructional capacity through professional development. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 335–359). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Dogan, O. K., Irez, S., & Han-Tosunoglu, C. (2018). International collaborative investigation of high school students’ understandings of scientific inquiry–A follow up study. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) Annual International Conference.
Lederman, J., Lederman, S., Bartels, S., Jimenez, J., Akubo, M., Aly, S., . . . Zhou, Q. (2019). An international collaborative investigation of beginning seventh grade students’ understandings of scientific inquiry: Establishing a baseline. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(4), 486–515.
Lee, Y. H. (2014). Comparative analysis of the presentation of the nature of science in US high school biology and Korea high school science textbooks. National Teacher Education Journal, 7(2).
Liu, Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2013). Content analysis of diagrams in secondary school science textbooks. In Critical analysis of science textbooks (pp. 287–300). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lumpe, A. T., & Scharmann, L. C. (1991). Meeting contemporary goals for lab instruction: A content analysis of two secondary biology textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 91(6), 231–235.
Ma, Y., Wang, T., Wang, J., Chen, A. L. R., & Yan, X. (2019). A comparative study on scientific inquiry activities of Chinese science textbooks in high schools. Research in Science Education, 1–21.
Magnusson, S. J., Palincsar, A. S., & Templin, M. (2006). Community, culture and conversation in inquiry based science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 131–155). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Marniok, K., & Reiners, C. S. (2017). Representations of nature of science in German school chemistry textbooks. In C. V. Mcdonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks (pp. 201–214). New York, NY: Routledge.
McDonald, C. V. (2017). Exploring representations of nature of science in Australian junior secondary school science textbooks: A case study of genetics. In C. V. Mcdonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks (pp. 98–117). New York, NY: Routledge.
McDonald, C. V., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2017). Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks. In C. V. Mcdonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2013). Biyoloji dersi (9–12 siniflar) Ogretim Programi (Biology Curriculum (grades 9–12)) [Biology lesson (9–12 grades) Teaching Program (Biology Curriculum (grades 9–12)]. Ankara, Turkey: MNE.
Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2019). Taslak Ders Ki̇tabi ve Eği̇ti̇m Araçlari ile Bunlara Ai̇t E-Içeri̇kleri̇n IIncelenmesi̇nde Değerlendi̇rmeye Esas Olacak Kri̇terler ve Açiklamalari [Draft course book and training tools and criteria for evaluation in examining their e-contents and their explanations]. Ankara, Turkey: MoNE.
Muspratt, S., & Freebody, P. (2013). Understanding the disciplines of science: Analysing the language of science textbooks. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Critical analysis of science textbooks: Evaluating instructional effectiveness (pp. 33–59). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide forteaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Niaz, M., & Coştu, B. (2013). Analysis of Turkish general chemistry textbooks based on a history and philosophy of science perspective. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Critical analysis of science textbooks: Evaluating instructional effectiveness (pp. 199–218). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Ödün, S. (2013). A comparative analysis of ecology units in the biology textbooks of secondary school programs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bilkent University, Turkey.
Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2007). To what degree do the currently used physics textbooks meet the expectations? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(4), 599–628.
Okeeffe, L. (2013). A framework for textbook analysis. International Review of Contemporary Learning Research, 2(1), 1–13.
Park, D. Y. (2005). Differences between a standards-based curriculum and traditional textbooks in high school earth science. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(5), 540–547.
Peng, C. L. & Huang, S. R. (2012). A study of gender ideology in Taiwan elementary school textbooks: Perspectives from textbook editors and reviewers. Chiayi, Taiwan: Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia Annual Conference.
Ramnarain, U. (2017). An analysis of South African school science textbooks for representations of nature of science. In C. V. Mcdonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks (pp. 188–200). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_3.
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260.
Tamir, P., & Lunetta, V. N. (1981). Inquiry-related tasks in high school science laboratory handbooks. Science Education, 65(5), 477–484.
Thayer-Bacon, B. J. (2014). The importance of cultural studies for education: For teachers and policymakers in America. In M. P. Mueller, D. J. Tippins, & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Assessing schools for generation R (responsibility): A guide for legislation and school policy in science education (pp. 267–277). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Vesterinen, V. M., Aksela, M., & Lavonen, J. (2013). Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in Nordic upper secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry. Science & Education, 22(7), 1839–1855.
Yager, R. E. (1996). Meaning of STS for science teachers. Science/technology/Society: As reform in science education, 16–24.
Yang, W., Liu, C., & Liu, E. (2019). Content analysis of inquiry-based tasks in high school biology textbooks in Mainland China. International Journal of Science Education, 41(6), 827–845.
Yang, W., & Liu, E. (2016). Development and validation of an instrument for evaluating inquiry-based tasks in science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2688–2711.
Acknowledgments
A short version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the International Organization for Science and Technology Education (IOSTE) in August 2018. I would like to thank to Prof. Dr. Serhat Irez for his generous help in this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1. Coding Example of an Activity
Appendix 1. Coding Example of an Activity
Above activity (Activity 12, MNE 9th-grade biology textbook, page 50) was translated from Turkish to English by the researcher in order to exemplify the coding process. The coding for each dimension is as follows;
CUASC: As an objective of the lesson (+), biology curriculum states that “Students should conduct experiments to associate nutrients with carbohydrates, fats, proteins and vitamins.” This experiment meets this aim as it is organized to determine the amount of glucose in different foods and, also meets the core idea (+) of the curriculum on this topic which is: “Students understand the importance of fat, carbohydrates, protein, vitamins and minerals for life, and establish their relationship with healthy nutrition”.
ES: Students are expected to observe (+) the changes in Benedict’s solution prepared with different type of foods. They should use glucose as a control variable (+). At the end of the activity, in analysis part, students should interpret data (+) to answer the question 2 and also should make inferences (+) through answering questions 1 and 3. As seen, this is a cookbook style activity (defining operationally −) which does not require students to communicate (−), classify (−), measure (−), predict (−), formulate hypotheses (−), formulate models (−) or let them ask their own questions (−).
UASI: Activity 12, does not give messages that all scientific research begins with a question (−). Further, there is not any questions to answer in the beginning or in the process, which indicates that student questions do not guide the procedure (−). Activity starts with directives which all students required to follow indicating that there is no opportunity to understand multiple methods (−) in science. In other words, there is a strict process to follow and a definitive result to reach. Therefore, it is obvious that there is no influence of students (scientists −) or procedures (−) on results. Although students are expected to draw conclusions based on their observations (conclusion consistent with data collected +) the activity does not allow students distinguish evidence from data (−). Lastly, the activity requires students to use their prior knowledge + (e.g., why they need to use heat) to produce an explanation as well as their observations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dogan, O.K. Methodological? Or Dialectical?: Reflections of Scientific Inquiry in Biology Textbooks. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 1563–1585 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10120-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10120-7