Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the Challenges and Enablers of Implementing a STEM Project-Based Learning Programme in a Diverse Junior Secondary Context

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the rush to implement STEM programmes in economically disadvantaged school districts, there is a pressing need to develop a stronger sense of what might be considered effective and appropriate STEM practices for diverse students. The aim of this study was to characterise the experience of implementing an integrated STEM Project-Based Learning (PBL) programme in an Australian secondary school located within a diverse, socio-economically disadvantaged community. To identify enablers and constraints in delivering STEM PBL in this context, the study utilised qualitative data from interviews with school teachers and leaders, school planning documents and an extended series of classroom observations. Key findings point towards the importance of building a school culture that supports innovative pedagogy; the need to purposefully scaffold the capabilities of teachers and students to engage with active learning; and the potential value of multi-dimensional assessment allowing students to demonstrate STEM proficiency through novel forms of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2016). Census data QuickStats. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/Home/2016%20QuickStats.

  • Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2019). MySchool ®. Retrieved from https://www.myschool.edu.au/

  • Barnes, D. (1989). Active learning. Leeds, England: University of Leeds TVEI Support Project.

  • Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). How can we teach for meaningful learning? Excerpt from Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, W. N. (2012). Project-Based Learning: Differentiating instruction for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.A. (2008). A review of the literature on case study research. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 1(1), 1–13.

  • Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM Project-Based Learning: An integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approach. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. Morgan (Eds.), STEM Project-Based Learning: An integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 1-5). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2020). Introducing argumentation about climate change socio-scientific issues in disadvantaged schools. Research in Science Education, 50, 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9715-x.

  • Education Council. (2015). National STEM school education strategy. Retrieved from http://www.educationcouncil.edu.au/site/DefaultSite/filesystem/documents/National%20STEM%20School%20Education%20Strategy.pdf

  • English, L. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(Suppl 1), S5–S24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M., & Tillotson, J. W. (2019). Interpreting integrated STEM: Sustaining pedagogical innovation within a public middle school context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1283–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9927-6.

  • LaForce, M., Noble, E., King, H., Century, J., Blackwell, C., Holt, S., Ibrahim, A., & Loo, S. (2016). The eight essential elements of inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larmer, J., Bergendoller, J. R., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for Project-Based Learning. Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T., Downes, N., & Leonard, S. (2017). STEM education for all young Australians: A Bright Spots Learning Hub Foundation Paper, for SVA, in partnership with Samsung. STEM Education Research Centre: University of Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. P. (2009). Re-imagining specialized STEM academies: Igniting and nurturing decidedly different minds, by design. Roeper Review, 32(1), 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016). Low-performing students: Why they fall behind and how to help them succeed. Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264250246-en.

  • Patton, M. (1980). Evaluation through observation. In Qualitative Evaluation Methods. (pp. 121–194). Beverley Hill, CA: SAGE Publications.

  • Peters-Burton, E. E., Lynch, S. J., Behrend, T. S., & Means, B. B. (2014). Inclusive STEM high school design: 10 critical components. Theory Into Practice, 53(1), 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Government. (2016). A strategy for STEM in Queensland State Schools. Retrieved from https://advancingeducation.qld.gov.au/ourPlan/Documents/schools-of-the-future-stem-strategy.pdf.

  • Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(13), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

  • Siraeva, M. (2018). Active learning strategies as a factor of humanitarization of modern higher education. Mundo Eslavo, 17, 208–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slough, S. W., & Milam, J. O. (2013). Theoretical framework for the design of STEM Project-Based Learning. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. Morgan (Eds.), STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 15-27). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

  • Stevens, R. (2005). What is Social Capital? Paper presented at conference of Australian Association of Research in education, Parramatta, NSW.

  • Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Underwood, C. (2017). PISA 2015: Reporting Australia’s results. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timms, M., Moyle, K., Weldon, P. R., & Mitchell, P. (2018). Challenges in STEM learning in Australian schools. Policy insights issue 7. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF Office of Research (2018). An unfair start: Inequality in children’s education in rich countries. Innocenti report card 15. Innocenti, Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, P. R. (2016). Policy insights: Out-of-field teaching in Australian secondary schools. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K., & Boldeman, S. (2012). Exploring ICT Integration as a Tool to Engage Young People at a Flexible Learning Centre. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 661–668.

  • Wilson, K., & Stemp, K. (2010). Science education in a ‘classroom without walls’: Connecting young people via place. Teaching Science, 56(1), 6–10.

  • Wilson, K., & Alloway, T. (2013). Expecting the unexpected: Engaging diverse young people in conversations around science. The Australian Educational Researcher, 40(2), 195–206.

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education and Arts, School of Education, Australian Catholic University (Brisbane), 1100 Nudgee Road, Banyo, Queensland, 4014, Australia

    Kimberley Wilson

Authors
  1. Kimberley Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberley Wilson.

Ethics declarations

This study was approved by the Australian Catholic University Human Research Ethics Committee (approval no. 2019-123H).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, K. Exploring the Challenges and Enablers of Implementing a STEM Project-Based Learning Programme in a Diverse Junior Secondary Context. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 881–897 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10103-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10103-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation