Abstract
This study aimed to give insights of in-service teachers’ experiences of nature of science (NOS) learning and NOS teaching through a co-teaching professional learning context. For this purpose, the co-teachers were encouraged to share and discuss ideas and to improve NOS teaching through reflection and collaborative interaction in the context of a Saturday science teaching program. The program provided students in Grades K–2 with hands-on activities covering various science topics over 5 weekly 2.5-h sessions. One co-teacher was an experienced university teacher; the other was an experienced primary teacher without NOS teaching experience. Data were collected by use of pre- and post-instruction of the Views of Nature of Science questionnaire, follow-up interviews, written artifacts, and videotaped teaching sessions. Results showed that co-teaching contributed to the teacher’s NOS learning as well as NOS teaching. The teacher recognized subjective, creative, empirical, and sociocultural NOS; she started to use NOS vocabulary more comfortably and developed teaching strategies and examples for sociocultural NOS.
Access this article
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.
Akerson, V., & Donnelly, L. A. (2010). Teaching nature of science to K-2 students: What understandings can they attain? International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 97–124.
Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1025–1049.
Akerson, V. L., Cullen, T. A., & Hanson, D. L. (2009). Fostering a community of practice through a professional development program to improve elementary teachers’ views of 'nature of science and teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1090–1113.
Akerson, V. L., & Volrich, M. L. (2006). Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first-grade internship setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 377–394.
Badiali, B., & Titus, N. (2010). Co-teaching: Enhancing student learning through mentor intern partnerships. School University Partnerships, 4(2), 74–79.
Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 533–548.
Bell, R. B. (2004). Perusing Pandora’s box: Exploring the what, when, and how of nature of science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Science inquiry and nature of science. Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 427–446). Dordrecht: Springer.
Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1–15.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Guise, M., Habib, M., Thiessen, K., & Robbins, A. (2017). Continuum of co-teaching implementation: Moving from traditional student teaching to co-teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 370–382.
Gurgur, H., & Uzuner, Y. (2011). Examining the implementation of two co-teaching models: Team teaching and station teaching. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(6), 589–610.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.
Melo, É., & Bächtold, M. (2018). A theater-based device for training teachers on the nature of science. Science & Education, 27, 963–986.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
National Science Teachers Association. (2000). NSTA position statement: The nature of science. Retrieved March 18, 2003, from http://www.nsta.org/159&psid=22
National Science Teachers Association. (2020). NSTA position statement: The nature of science. https://www.nsta.org/about/positions/natureofscience.aspx. Accessed 16 Apr 2020.
Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity, promises and practicalities. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
Quigley, C., Pongsanon, K., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). If we teach them, they can learn: Young students views of nature of science during an informal science education program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(2), 129–121.
Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2004). Coteaching: From praxis to theory. Teachers and Teaching, 10(2), 161–179.
Ryder, J., Leach, J., & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science students’ images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 201–219.
Rytivaara, A., & Kershner, R. (2012). Co-teaching as a context for teachers’ professional learning and joint knowledge construction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7), 999–1008.
Scantlebury, K. (2005). Gender issues in co-teaching. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Teaching together, learning together (Vol. 294, pp. 233–248). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Thompson, K. W., & Dow, M. J. (2017). Co-teaching to improve control variable experiment instruction in physical sciences education. Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 21(5). https://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/17500. Accessed 18 May 2020.
Tobin, K. (2006). Learning to teach through coteaching and cogenerative dialogue. Teaching Education, 17(2), 133–142.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bilican, K., Akerson, V. & Nargund, V. Learning by Teaching: a Case Study of Co-teaching to Enhance Nature of Science Pedagogy, Successes, and Challenges. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 957–976 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10094-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10094-6