Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Determination and Evaluation of the Science Teacher Candidates’ Misconceptions About Density by Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study has two aims. The first one is to reveal the science teacher candidates’ misconceptions about the density by using a four-tier diagnostic test, and the second one is to determine to what extent science teacher candidates have scientific knowledge, lack of knowledge, and misconceptions about the density. In order to achieve these aims, a four-tier density diagnostic test was developed with the KR-20 reliability coefficient of 0.753 based on the correct answers, and the KR-20 reliability coefficient of 0.528 based on the misconceptions. To determine the misconceptions about the density with the developed test, data were collected from a total of 470 science teacher candidates from seven different universities in Turkey. With the developed four-tier diagnostic test, 48 different misconceptions were revealed. The results of the research showed that about one fourth of science teacher candidates had a misconception about the density and that the ratio of six of the resulting misconceptions was over 10%. It may be suggested that this study conducted on science teacher candidates should also be conducted on middle and high school students and experimental studies should be carried out to eliminate the misconceptions that emerged in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C., & Moseley, C. (2012). A three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667–1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, J., & Ogborn, J. (1994). Force and motion from the beginning. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. (2010a). Development and application of a three- tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students’ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. (2010b). Do students know what they know and what they don’t know? Using a four-tier diagnostic test to assess the nature of students’ alternative conceptions. Research in Science Education, 40, 313–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazbeck, B., & Ayoubi, Z. (2018). Resources used by Lebanese secondary physics teachers' for teaching electricity: Types, objectives and factors affecting their selection. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 4(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.409487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J., Brown, D. E., & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: Finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students' intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 554–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepni, S., & Sahin, C. (2012). Effect of different teaching methods and techniques embedded in the 5E instructional model on students’ learning about buoyancy force. Eurasian Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education, 4(2), 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costu, B., Unal, S., & Ayas, A. (2007). A hands-on activity to promote conceptual change about mixtures and chemical compounds. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(1), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Develi, F., & Namdar, B. (2019). Defining friction force: A proposed solution to a textbook problem. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 5(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.487399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, K. R., Dickerson, D. L., McKinney, S. E., & Butler, S. (2008). Teaching density to middle school students: Pre-service teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical practices. The Clearing House, 82(1), 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development and application of three-tier heat and temperature test: Sample of bachelor and graduate students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 40, 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, P. E., & Subramaniam, K. (2014). Teachers need to be smarter than a 5th grader: What elementary pre-service teachers know about density. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999). Misconceptions and the certainty of response index (CRI). Physics Education, 34, 294–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1504.

  • Joung, Y. J. (2009). Children’s typically-perceived-situations of floating and sinking. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 101–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltakci, D. (2012). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.

  • Kaltakci, D., & Didis, D. (2007). Identification of pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions on gravity concept: A study with a 3-tier misconception test. In S. A. Cetin & I. Hikmet (Eds.), Sixth International Conference of the Balkan Physical Union (pp. 499–500). New York, NY: American Institute of Physics.

  • Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 238–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawasaki, K., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Yeary, S. A. (2004). Theory building and modeling in a sinking and floating unit: A case study of third and fourth grade students' developing epistemologies of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1299–1324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000177226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keles, O., Ertas, H., Uzun, N., & Cansiz, M. (2010). The understanding levels of pre-service teachers’ of basic science concepts’ measurement units and devices, their misconceptions and its causes. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 390–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kind, V. (2004). Beyond appearances: Students´ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas (2nd ed.). Durham, England: Durham University.

  • Kingir, S., Geban, O., & Gunel, M. (2013). Using the science writing heuristic approach to enhance student understanding in chemical change and mixture. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1645–1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiray, S. A., Aktan, F., Kaynar, H., Kilinc, S. & Gorkemli, T. (2015). A descriptive study of pre-service science teachers’ misconceptions about sinking–floating. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(2), Article2.

  • Kloos, H., Fisher, A., & Van Orden, G. C. (2010). Situated naïve physics: Task constraints decide what children know about density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 4, 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kose, S. (2004). Effectiveness of conceptual change texts accompanied with concept mapping instructions on overcoming prospective science teachers’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Trabzon: Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Karadeniz Teknik University.

  • Korkmaz, S. D., Ayas, B., Aybek, E. C., & Pat, S. (2018). Evaluating the gifted students’ understanding related to plasma state using plasma experimental system and two-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 4(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.387480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutluay, Y. (2005). Diagnosis of eleventh grade students’ misconceptions about geometric optic by a three-tier test (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

  • Nakiboglu, N., & Nakiboglu, C. (2016). University students’ understanding of density and concentration: A cross-level investigation. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences, 4, 550–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onsal, G. (2016). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess misconceptions about special relativity theory (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara: Gazi University.

  • Shaker, Z. (2012). The use of concept maps as a tool for understanding conceptual change in pre-service elementary teachers on the concept of density. International Review of Contemporary Learning Research - An International Journal, 1(1), 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J. (2006). On the integration of formative assessment in teaching and learning with implications for teacher education. Paper prepared for the Stanford Education Assessment Laboratory and the University of Hawaii Curriculum Research and Development Group. Retrieved August 24, 2014 from http://www.stanford.edu/dept/SUSE/SEAL/Reports_Papers/Paper.htm.

  • She, H. C. (2002). Concepts of a higher hierarchical level require more dual situated learning events for conceptual change: A study of air pressure and buoyancy force. International Journal of Science Education, 24(9), 981–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • She, H. C. (2005). Promoting students’ learning of air pressure concepts: The interrelationship of teaching approaches and student learning characteristics. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spada, H. (1994). Conceptual change or multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 4, 113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasulu, B., & Subramaniam, R. (2013). University students’ understanding of chemical thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 601–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasdere, A., & Ercan, F. (2011). An alternative method in identifying misconceptions: Structured communication gird. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2699–2703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taslidere, E. (2016). Development and use of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess high school students’ misconceptions about the photoelectric effect. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 164–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 297–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ultay, N., & Akpinar, M. (2008). Öğretmen adaylarının ve öğrencilerin özkütle hakkındaki kavram yanılgılarının tespiti [Determination of misconceptions to prospective teachers and students about density], 8. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu: Ulusal Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Sempozyumu.

  • Unal, S. (2008). Changing students’ misconceptions of floating and sinking using hands-on activities. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(3), 134–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York, NY: Macmillan.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data of this study were taken from the second author’s master thesis, where the first author is the thesis advisor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Necmettin Erbakan University, Ahmet Kelesoglu Education Faculty Science Education Department, A-223 Meram 42090, Konya, Turkey

    Seyit Ahmet Kiray

  2. Beyhan Gençay Primary School, Hatay, Turkey

    Sena Simsek

Authors
  1. Seyit Ahmet Kiray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sena Simsek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyit Ahmet Kiray.

Additional information

Web: https://www.erbakan.edu.tr/matematikvefenbilimleri/anabilim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiray, S.A., Simsek, S. Determination and Evaluation of the Science Teacher Candidates’ Misconceptions About Density by Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 935–955 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10087-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10087-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation