Abstract
Learning science encompasses learning the language of science, which can pose considerable challenges to students due to its specialized features and structures. Addressing the three-language problem (the need to transition between daily, general school and disciplinary languages) and the specific language demands of science thus constitutes part of the larger goal of promoting disciplinary literacy. Most studies have focused on the conceptual demands of science learning and have not examined what knowledge teachers require to support students’ learning of the language of science. In this study, we focus on science teachers’ knowledge of students (KS) for addressing the language demands of science. This qualitative case study has two aims: (1) to unpack a teacher’s KS related to their language use in science and (2) to uncover how this KS informs teaching practices. Transcripts of teacher interviews, lesson planning sessions and lessons drawn from two Grade 4 science classrooms taught by a primary science teacher constituted the data for this study. We identify five aspects of KS (i.e. prior knowledge of and about language, difficulties with language, abilities across modes of language and across subject areas and learning progress) that inform four distinct teaching practices. This case study highlights and unpacks a dimension of KS that is often overlooked in the current literature on pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for science teaching. The implications to teachers’ PCK, science teaching and teacher professional development are discussed in light of the findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Accurso, K.. (2017). Developing disciplinary linguistic knowledge: Systemic functional linguistics and the new knowledge base of teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Antonio.
Alonzo, A. C., Kobarg, M., & Seidel, T. (2012). Pedagogical content knowledge as reflected in teacher–student interactions: Analysis of two video cases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(10), 1211–1239.
Andrews, S. J., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2017). Language awareness and teacher development. In P. Garrett & J. M. Cots (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 57–74). London: Routledge.
Brown, B. A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A “content-first” approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529–553.
Bunch, G. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 298–341.
Carlsen, W. S. (2007). Language and science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 57–74). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chan, K. K. H., & Yung, B. H. W. (2015). On-site pedagogical content knowledge development. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1246–1278.
Chan, K. K. H., & Yung, B. H. W. (2018). Developing pedagogical content knowledge for teaching a new topic: More than teaching experience and subject matter knowledge. Research in Science Education , 48(2), 233–265.
Chan, K. K. H., & Hume, A. (2019). Towards a consensus model: Literature review of how science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge is investigated In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning PCK in teachers’ professional knowledge (pp. 3–76). Singapore: Springer.
Christie, F. (2005). Speech and writing (Chapter 4). In F. Christie (Ed.), Language education in the primary years (pp. 48–63). Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 2–14.
de Sá Ibraim, S., & Justi, R. (2019). Discussing paths trodden by PCK: An invitation to reflection. Research in Science Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09867-z.
Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: Explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education, 52(4), 449–472.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Fang, Z. H. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491–520.
Fang, Z. H. (2012). Language correlates of disciplinary literacy. Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 19–34.
Fang, Z., & Coatoam, S. (2013). Disciplinary literacy: What you want to know about it. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(8), 627–632.
Fang, Z. H., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(7), 587–597.
Fazio, X., Gallagher, T.L. (2019) Science and Language Integration in Elementary Classrooms: Instructional Enactments and Student Learning Outcomes. Research in Science Education, 49, 959–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9850-z
Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). The language of science. London: Continuum.
Hand, B., Norton-Meier, L., Gunel, M., & Akkus, R. (2016). Aligning teaching to learning: A 3-year study examining the embedding of language and argumentation into elementary science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(5), 847–863.
Hart, J. E., & Lee, O. (2003). Teacher professional development to improve the science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 475–501.
He, P., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2018). Becoming a language-aware content teacher. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(2), 162–188.
Lan, S.-W., & de Oliveira, L. C. (2019). English language learners’ participation in the discourse of a multilingual science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 41(9), 1246–1270.
Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233.
Love, K. (2009). Literacy pedagogical content knowledge in secondary teacher education: Reflecting on oral language and learning across the disciplines. Language and Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 23(6), 541–560.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The constructs and its implications (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Springer.
Morton, T. (2018). Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 275–286.
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196.
Park, S., & Chen, Y. C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922–941.
Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1365–1387.
Seah, L. H. (2016a). Elementary Teachers’ Perception of Language Issues in Science Classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(6), 1059-1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9648-z
Seah, L. H. (2016b). Understanding the Conceptual and Language Challenges Encountered by Grade 4 Students When Writing Scientific Explanations. Research in Science Education, 46(3), 413-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9464-z
Seah, L. H., & Yore, L. D. (2017). The roles of teachers’ science talk in revealing language demands within diverse elementary school classrooms: a study of teaching heat and temperature in Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1270477
Shanahan, M.-C. (2012). Reading for evidence through hybrid adapted primary literature. In S. P. Norris (Ed.), Reading for evidence and interpreting visualizations in mathematics and science education (pp. 41–63). Rotterdam: Sense.
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18.
Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393–429.
Shaw, J. M., Bunch, G. C., & Geaney, E. R. (2010). Analyzing language demands facing English learners on science performance assessments: The SALD framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 909–928.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Singapore Department of Statistics. (2015). General household survey 2015. Retrieved from https://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/ghs/ghs2015content. Accessed 17 Oct 2019
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Turkan, S., De Oliveira, L. C., Lee, O., & Phelps, G. (2014). Proposing the knowledge base for teaching academic content to English language learners: Disciplinary linguistic knowledge. Teachers College Record, 116(3), 1–30.
van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.
Villegas, A. M., SaizdeLaMora, K., Martin, A. D., & Mills, T. (2018). Preparing future mainstream teachers to teach English language learners: A review of the empirical literature. The Educational Forum, 82(2), 138–155.
Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy - empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2), 291–314.
Funding
This work is supported by a grant from the National Institute of Education, Singapore (OER 65/12 SLH). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position, policy or endorsement of the funding agency. The authors are grateful to the teachers and students who participated in this study and would also like to acknowledge the contribution of research team member Ms. Teresa Ong for her help with collecting the data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
ESM 1
(DOCX 15 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seah, L.H., Chan, K.K.H. A Case Study of a Science Teacher’s Knowledge of Students in Relation to Addressing the Language Demands of Science. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 267–287 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10049-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10049-6