Many researchers have illustrated the multi-faceted nature of classroom mathematics discussions, but few have demonstrated the effect of discussion on students’ assessment performance. We developed and employed a discussion observation instrument in 20 third and fourth grade classrooms in an economically disadvantaged, linguistically diverse school district and used hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to determine whether between-class variation in word-problem-test scores can be explained by levels of class discussion. Results suggest overall class discussion scores, as well as two specific discussion features, variety of approaches and opportunities to speak, are significantly related to test performance. These results suggest classroom instruction including high-level math discussion may improve students’ performance on written measures of achievement.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219–234.
Akkus, R., & Hand, B. (2010). Examining teacher’s struggles as they attempt to implement dialogical interaction as part of promoting mathematical reasoning within their classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 975–998.
Assor, A. (2012). Allowing choice and nurturing an inner compass: Educational practices supporting students’ need for autonomy. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 421-439). Springer, Boston, MA.
Banes, L. C., Ambrose, R. C., Bayley, R., Restani, R. M., & Martin, H. A. (2018). Mathematical classroom discussion as an equitable practice: Effects on elementary English learners’ performance. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 17(6), 416–433.
Baxter, J. A., Woodward, J., & Olson, D. (2001). Effects of reform-based mathematics instruction on low achievers in five third-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 529-547.
Boston, M. (2012). Assessing instructional quality in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 76–104.
Boston, M., Bostic, J., Lesseig, K., & Sherman, M. (2015). A comparison of mathematics classroom observation protocols. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3(2), 154–175.
Cirillo, M. (2013). What does research say the benefits of discussion in mathematics class are? (Research Brief No. 19). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Charles, R. I., Fennell, R., Caldwell, J., Cavanagh, M., Sammons, K., Schlielack, J., et al. (2009). enVision Math. Glenview, IL: Pearson Scott Foresman.
Chi, M. T. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. Advances in instructional psychology, 5, 161–238.
Cobo, P., & Fortuny, J. (2000). Social interactions and cognitive effects in contexts of area-comparison problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(2), 115–140.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
Crespo, S., & Harper, F. K. (in press). Learning to pose collaborative mathematics problems with secondary prospective teachers. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.003.
Diamond, J. B. (2007). Where the rubber meets the road: Rethinking the connection between high-stakes testing policy and classroom instruction. Sociology of Education, 80(4), 285–313.
Durkin, K., Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2017). Using comparison of multiple strategies in the mathematics classroom: lessons learned and next steps. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(4), 585–597.
Escamilla, K., Hopewell, S., Butvilofsky, S., Sparrow, W., Soltero-González, L., Ruiz-Figueroa, O., & Escamilla, M. (2014). Biliteracy from the start: Literacy squared in action (pp. 25–26). Philadelphia, PA: Caslon Publishing.
Evans, S., & Swan, M. (2014). Developing students’ strategies for problem solving in mathematics: The role of pre-designed “Sample Student Work”. Educational Designer, 2(7), 1–31.
Featherstone, H., Crespo, S., Jilk, L. M., Oslund, J., Parks, A., & Wood, M. (2011). Smarter together! Collaboration and equity in the elementary math classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Forman, E. A., McCormick, D., & Donato, R. (1998). Learning what counts as a mathematical explanation. Linguistics and Education, 9(4), 313–339.
Fraivillig, J. L., Murphy, L. A., & Fuson, K. C. (1999). Advancing children’s mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 148–170.
Gallimore, R., Hiebert, J. & Ermeling, B. (2014). Rich classroom discussion: One way to get rich learning. Teachers College Record. http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 17714.
García, O. (2009). Emergent bilinguals and TESOL: What's in a name?. Tesol Quarterly, 43(2), 322–326.
Halpin, P. F., & Kieffer, M. J. (2015). Describing profiles of instructional practice: A new approach to analyzing classroom observation data. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 263–277.
Heinze, A., Marschick, F., & Lipowsky, F. (2009). Addition and subtraction of three-digit numbers: Adaptive strategy use and the influence of instruction in German third grade. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41(5), 591–604.
Hemmings, B., Grootenboer, P., & Kay, R. (2011). Predicting mathematics achievement: The influence of prior achievement and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 691–705.
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). New York: Macmillan.
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 1 (pp. 371–404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393–425.
Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York: Routledge.
Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81–116.
Jones, I., Swan, M., & Pollitt, A. (2015). Assessing mathematical problem solving using comparative judgment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 151–177.
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144.
Kazemi, E., & Hintz, A. (2013). Intentional talk: How to structure and lead productive mathematical discussions. Stenhouse Publishers.
Kazemi, E., & Hintz, A. (2014). Intentional talk: How to structure and lead productive mathematical discussions. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.
Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2001). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 59–80.
Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of Psychological Testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Knapp, M., Shields, P. M., & Turnbull, B. J. (1995). Academic challenge in high poverty classrooms. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 770–776.
Kosko, K., & Miyazaki, Y. (2012). The effect of student discussion frequency on fifth-grade students' mathematics achievement in U.S. schools. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.566588.
Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American educational research journal, 27(1), 29-63.
Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. Stata press.
Mathematics Learning Study Committee. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Matthews, P., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2009). In pursuit of knowledge: Comparing self-explanations, concepts, and procedures as pedagogical tools. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(1), 1–21.
McEldoon, K. L., Durkin, K. L., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2013). Is self-explanation worth the time? A comparison to additional practice. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 615–632.
Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359–377.
Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507–528.
Merritt, E. G., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Berry, R. Q., Walkowiak, T. A., & Larsen, R. A. (2011). The contribution of mathematics instructional quality and class size to student achievement for third grade students from low income families. Paper presented at Fall Conference of Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. D.C.: Washington.
Moschkovich, J. (2013). Principles and guidelines for equitable mathematics teaching practices and materials for English language learners. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(1), 45–57.
Murata, A. (2012). Diversity and high academic expectations without tracking: Inclusively responsive instruction. Journal of Learning Sciences, 22(2), 312–335.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in health sciences education, 15(5), 625–632.
O'Connor, C., Michaels, S., Chapin, S., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2017). The silent and the vocal: Participation and learning in whole-class discussion. Learning and Instruction, 48, 5–13.
Otten, S., & Soria, V. M. (2014). Relationships between students’ learning and their participation during enactment of middle school algebra tasks. ZDM, 46(5), 815–827.
Pasta, D. J. (2009). Learning When to Be Discrete: Continuous vs. Categorical Predictors. In SAS Global Forum 2009. San Francisco, CA: ICON Clinical Research.
Planas, N., & Gorgorió, N. (2004). Are different students expected to learn norms differently in the mathematics classroom? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 19–40.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Richland, L. E., Begolli, K. N., Simms, N., Frausel, R. R., & Lyons, E. A. (2017). Supporting mathematical discussions: the roles of comparison and cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 41–53.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Saylor, M., & Swygert, K. E. (2008). Learning from explaining: Does it matter if mom is listening? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100(3), 215–224.
Sawada, D., Piburn, Judson, E. M., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics Journal, 102, 245–253.
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454–499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307310317.
Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
Silver, E. A., Ghousseini, H., Gosen, D., Charalambou, C., & Font Strawhun, B. T. (2005). Moving from rhetoric to praxis: Issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions to problems in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics and Behavior, 24, 287–301.
Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1–27.
Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50–80.
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488.
Stein, M. K., Correnti, R., Moore, D., Russell, J. L., & Kelly, K. (2017). Using theory and measurement to sharpen conceptualizations of mathematics teaching in the common core era. AERA Open, 3(1), 2332858416680566.
Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4), 1–19.
Sullivan, G. M., & Artino Jr., A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of graduate medical education, 5(4), 541–542.
Walkowiak, T., Berry, R. Q., Meyer, J. P., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Ottmar, E. R. (2014). Introducing an observational measure of standards-based mathematics teaching practices: Evidence of validity and score reliability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 109128.
Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516–551.
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2014). Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 79–93.
The research reported here was supported by the Math Alliance II, a professional development project funded by California Department of Education’s Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program (ITQ) State Agency for Higher Education (formerly the California Postsecondary Education Commission) awarded to Rebecca Ambrose, Robert Bayley, and Michelle Anderson.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Banes, L.C., Restani, R.M., Ambrose, R.C. et al. Relating Performance on Written Assessments to Features of Mathematics Discussion. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 18, 1375–1398 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10029-w
- Hierarchical linear modeling
- Mathematical discussion
- Mathematics achievement
- Mathematics education
- Observation instrument