Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preservice Teachers’ Exploration of Model Breaking Points

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is an investigation of elementary preservice teachers’ (PSTs’) exploration of model breaking points in fractions. Eighty-three PSTs at two universities in the Midwestern and Southwestern regions of the USA were asked to explore the area model of fraction addition through a series of tasks and explain their reasoning in determining its affordances and constraints. The PSTs presented their critical mathematical ideas on modeling fraction addition and area models’ breaking points when used to add two fractions, as well as suggestions for alternative models to overcome model breaking points. An inductive content analysis showed that most PSTs represented fraction addition well with simple fractions but had difficulty representing fraction addition with improper fractions or fractions with unlike and relatively large denominators and tended to use algorithm-based thinking. Also, the area models drawn by several PSTs revealed various misconceptions, suggesting the impact of their content knowledge on their understanding of area models. Based on the findings from this study, we provide some implications for teacher educators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D. L. (1992). Magical hopes: Manipulatives and the reform of math education. American Educator, 16(2), 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A. . . . Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive action in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J. (2005). U.S. and Chinese teachers’ constructing, knowing, and evaluating representations to teach mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(2), 135­–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J. (2006). U.S. and Chinese teachers’ conceptions and constructions of representations: A case of teaching ratio concept. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 145–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K., & Henry, A. (2002). Using manipulative models to build number sense for addition of fractions. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp. 41–48). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K., Wyberg, T., & Leavitt, S. (2008). The role of representations in fraction addition and subtraction. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13(8), 490–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCulloch, A. W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23, 136–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Empson, S. B. (1999). Equal sharing and shared meaning: The development of fraction concepts in a first-grade classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 17(3), 283–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures, and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G., & Hall, R. P. (1997). Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2015). Relationships between students’ fractional knowledge and equation writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(2), 196–243.

  • Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, D. P. (2013). What teachers need to know to teach mathematics: An argument for a reconceptualised model. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(11), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izsák, A. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching fraction multiplication. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 95–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamii, C., Lewis, B. A., & Kirkland, L. (2001). Manipulatives: When are they useful. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of mathematics teachers: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 90–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C. (2005). A cognitive tool for teaching the addition/subtraction of common fractions: A model of affordances. Computers & Education, 45(2), 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. Y. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ flexibility with referent units in solving a fraction division problem. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(3), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9771-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. Y., & Hackenberg, A. J. (2014). Relationships between fractional knowledge and algebraic reasoning: The case of Willa. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 975–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9442-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., Brown, M. N., Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Assessing beginning secondary science teachers’ PCK: Pilot year results. School Science and Mathematics, 107(2), 52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. J., Brown, R. E., & Orrill, C. H. (2011). Mathematics teachers’ reasoning about fractions and decimals using drawn representations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(3), 198–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKendree, J., Small, C., & Stenning, K. (2002). The role of representation in teaching and learning critical thinking. Educational Review, 54, 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. K., Hiebert, J., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: What can preservice teachers learn? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 491–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: NGA & CCSSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Walle, J., Karp, K. S., & Bam-Williams, J. M. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, J. A., & Lovin, L. H. (2006). Teaching student-centered mathematics: Grades 3–5. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vig, R., Murray, E., & Star, J. R. (2014). Model breaking points conceptualized. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woleck, K. R. (2001). Listen to their pictures: An investigation of children’s mathematical drawings. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics: 2001 yearbook (pp. 215–227). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Zazkis, R., & Gadowsky, K. (2001). Attending to transparent features of opaque representations of natural numbers. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics: 2001 yearbook (pp. 44–52). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 179–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Teacher Development and Educational Studies, Oakland University, 456 Pioneer Drive, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA

    Ji-Eun Lee

  2. Division of Teacher Preparation, Mathematics Education, Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

    Mi Yeon Lee

Authors
  1. Ji-Eun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mi Yeon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji-Eun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, JE., Lee, M.Y. Preservice Teachers’ Exploration of Model Breaking Points. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 18, 549–565 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09974-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09974-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation