Out-of-Field Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices: an Examination of Change and Tensions Using Zone Theory

  • Ciara LaneEmail author
  • Máire Ní Ríordáin


This paper describes an empirical study examining action research papers submitted by a group (n = 81) of out-of-field mathematics teachers as part of a professional development programme in Ireland. Utilising document analysis, the papers were qualitatively analysed for evidence of teachers’ beliefs and practices with respect to the teaching and learning of mathematics. In particular, demonstration of direct transmission and constructivist beliefs and practices was explored. The authors draw on Valsiner’s zone theory in conceptualising the ‘teacher-as-learner’ in this out-of-field context and it provided a means for analysing teachers’ development in terms of their beliefs and practices. Findings indicate a prevalence of direct transmission or traditional teaching practices prior to the out-of-field teachers’ action research, with some inconsistency with professed constructivist beliefs. There was evidence of a majority shift towards constructivist beliefs and practices post action research for a myriad of reasons, including increased pedagogical confidence in mathematics and the successful experience of constructivist approaches. Findings also highlight the role of reflective self-study in facilitating the creation of productive tensions, as well as the importance of the teachers’ interpretation of their zone of free movement in resolving complex issues and enabling out-of-field teachers’ development of constructivist beliefs and practices.


Out-of-field teaching Mathematics teachers Action research Beliefs Practices 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical approval was granted for a large-scale research project underpinning the PDMT, of which examining the action research component was part of the overall project. Consent was gained from participants on commencement of their studies.


  1. Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Keer, H., & Haerens, L. (2016). Changing teachers’ beliefs about autonomy support and structure: The role of experienced psychological need satisfaction in teacher training. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 23, 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beswick, K. (2004). The impact of teachers’ perceptions of student characteristics on the enactment of their beliefs. In M. J. Hoines & A. J. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 111–118). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.Google Scholar
  3. Blanton, M., Westbrook, S., & Carter, G. (2005). Using Valsiner’s zone theory to interpret teaching practices in mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(1), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosse, M. (2014). The practice of out-of-field teaching in mathematics classrooms. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.), Taking an international perspective on ‘out-of-field’ teaching: Proceedings and agenda for research and action, 1st Teaching Across Specialisations (TAS) Collective Symposium (pp. 33–34). Porto, Portugal: TAS Collective.Google Scholar
  5. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darling-Hammond, L. & Post, L. (2000). Inequality in teaching and schooling: Supporting high quality teaching and leadership in low income schools. In R. D. Kahlenberg (Ed.), A nation at risk: Preserving public education as an engine for social mobility (pp. 127–167). New York, NY: The Century Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  8. De Vries, S., Van De Grift, W., & Jansen, E. (2014). How teachers’ beliefs about learning and teaching relate to their continuing professional development. Teachers & Teaching, 20(3), 338–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Department of Education and Skills (2010). Report of the project Maths implementation support group. Dublin, Ireland: Department of Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  10. Du Plessis, A. (2014). Out-of-field teaching practices as an unresolved global concern influencing teacher quality and effective classroom pedagogies. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds), Taking an international perspective on ‘out-of-field’ teaching: Proceedings and agenda for research and action from the 1st Teaching Across Specialisations (TAS) Collective Symposium (pp. 27–29). Porto, Portugal: TAS Collective. Retrieved from
  11. Du Plessis, A., Gillies, R. M., & Carroll, A. (2015). Understanding the lived experiences of novice out-of-field teachers in relation to school leadership practices. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art (pp. 249–254). London, England: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  13. Galbraith, P. L., & Goos, M. (2003). From description to analysis in technology aided teaching and learning: A contribution form Zone Theory. In L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert & J. Mousley (Eds.), Mathematics education research: Innovation, networking, opportunity: Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia (Vol. 1, pp. 364–371). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  14. Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analysing qualitative data. London, England: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. Goos, M. (2013). Sociocultural perspectives in research on and with mathematics teachers: A zone theory approach. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(4), 521–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2010). Theoretical perspectives on mathematics teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(6), 499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching out-of-field as a boundary-crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hobbs, L. & Porsch, R. (2019). Introduction. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.), Examining the phenomenon of “teaching out-of-field”: International perspectives on teaching as a non-specialist (pp. 12–15). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Hobbs, L. & Törner, G. (Eds.). (2019). Examining the phenomenon of “teaching out-of-field”: International perspectives on teaching as a non-specialist. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Ingersoll, R. M. (2002). Out-of-field teaching, educational inequality and the organisation of schools: An exploratory analysis. Seattle, WA: University of Washington: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.Google Scholar
  22. Jaworski, B. (1998). Mathematics teacher research: Process, practice and the development of teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Kunter, M., Kleickmann, T., Klusmann, U., & Richter, D. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McNiff, J. (2010). Action research for professional development: Concise advice for new and experienced action researchers. Poole, Dorset: September Books.Google Scholar
  26. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Ní Ríordáin, M. & Hannigan, A. (2011). Who teaches our students mathematics at post-primary education in Ireland? Irish Educational Studies, 30(3), 289–304.Google Scholar
  28. Ní Ríordáin, M., Paolucci, C. & O’Dwyer, L. M. (2017). An examination of the professional development needs of out-of-field mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 162–174.Google Scholar
  29. Noffke, S. E. (2009). Revisiting the professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. In S. E. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The sage handbook of educational action research (pp. 5–18). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Available at
  31. Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roche, M. (2011). Creating a dialogical and critical classroom: Reflection and action to improve practice. Educational Action Research, 19(3), 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ross, J. A., Cousins, J. B., Gadalla, T. & Hannay, L. (1999). Administrative assignment of teachers in restructuring secondary schools: The effect of out-of-field course responsibility on teacher efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 782–805.Google Scholar
  34. Silverman, D. (2017). Doing qualitative research (5th ed.). London, England: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  35. Teaching Council (2011). Initial teacher education: Criteria and guidelines for Programme providers. Available at
  36. Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s action: A theory of human development (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wild, P. J., McMahon, C., Darlington, M., Liu, S., & Culley, S. (2009). A diary study of information needs and document usage in the engineering domain. Design Studies, 31(1), 46–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang, Q., & Morselli, F. (2016). Teacher Beliefs. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Attitudes, beliefs, motivation and identity in mathematics education: An overview of the field and future directions (pp. 11–14). Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EPI*STEM, National Centre for STEM Education, School of EducationUniversity of LimerickLimerickIreland
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations