Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Korean Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Abilities to Identify Equiprobability Bias and Teaching Strategies

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Equiprobability bias (EB) is one of the frequently observed misconceptions in probability education in K-12 and can be affected by a problem context. As future teachers, preservice teachers need to have a stable understanding of probability and to have the knowledge to identify EB in their students regardless of the problem context. However, there are few studies to explore how preservice teachers identify students’ EB and how they respond to students’ EB. This study investigated Korean preservice elementary school teachers’ abilities to identify students’ EB in two problem contexts, marble and baseball problems, as well as their teaching strategies for correcting students’ EB within each problem. Ninety-six preservice elementary school teachers participated in this study. They were presented with two problems with students having EB and were asked to write lesson plays. From the analysis of their lesson plays, it was found that 87% of the preservice teachers identified students’ EB in both problems, and in the baseball problem, 13% of them did not. Three teaching strategies for correcting students’ EB in each problem were found. Based on the results, implications for preservice elementary teacher education were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ang, L. H. & Shahrill, M. (2014). Identifying students’ specific misconceptions in learning probability. International Journal of Probability and Statistics, 3(2), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijps.20140302.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anway, D. & Bennett, E. (2004, August). Common misperceptions in probability among students in an elementary statistics class. Paper presented at the ARTIST Roundtable Conference on Assessment in Statistics, Lawrence University.

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2015). Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. Retrieved from http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/Mathematics_-_Sequence_of_content.pdf.

  • Batanero, C., Arteaga, P., Serrano, L. & Ruiz, B. (2014). Prospective primary school teachers’ perception of randomness. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 345–366). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Batanero, C., Chernoff, E. J., Engel, J., Lee, H. S. & Sánchez, E. (2016). Research on teaching and learning probability. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-31625-3.

  • Batanero, C., Godino, J. D. & Cañizares, M. J. (2005). Simulation as a tool to train pre-service school teachers. In J. Addler (Ed.), Proceedings of ICMI First African Regional Conference. Retrieved from http://www.ugr.es/~batanero/pages/ARTICULOS/CMIRCr.pdf.

  • Batanero, C., Henry, M. & Parzysz, B. (2005). The nature of chance and probability. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school (pp. 15–37). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Batanero, C., Navarro-Pelayo, V. & Godino, J. D. (1997). Effect of the implicit combinatorial model on combinatorial reasoning in secondary school pupils. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(2), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batanero, C. & Sánchez, E. (2005). What is the nature of high school students’ conceptions and misconceptions about probability? In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school (pp. 241–266). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biehler, R. (2016). Professional development for teaching probability and inference statistics with digital tools at upper secondary level. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Hamburg.

  • Borovcnik, M., Bentz, H.-I. & Kapadia, R. (1991). A probabilistic perspective. In A. I. Bishop (Ed.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 73–105). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Callaert, H. (2004). In search of the specificity and the identifiability of stochastic thinking and reasoning. In M. A. Mariotti (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Retrieved from http://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~erme/CERME3/Groups/TG5/TG5_callaert_cerme3.pdf.

  • Fielding-Wells, J. (2014, July). Where’s your evidence? Challenging young students’ equiprobability bias through argumentation. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9), Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312069236_Where's_your_evidence_Challenging_young_students'_equiprobability_bias_through_argumentation.

  • Gal, I. (2005). Towards “probability literacy” for all citizens: Building blocks and instructional dilemmas. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school (pp. 39–63). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W. & Mooney, E. S. (2007). Research in probability: Responding to classroom realities. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 909–955). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecoutre, M.-P. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in “purely random” situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(6), 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2000). Chinese students’ understanding of probability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

  • Li, J. & Pereira-Mendoza, L. (2002, July). Misconceptions in probability. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS6). Retrieved from https://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots6/6g4_jun.pdf.

  • Mamolo, A. & Zazkis, R. (2014). Contextual considerations in probabilistic situations: An aid or a hindrance? In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 641–656). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2014). The New Zealand Curriculum. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum/Mathematics-and-statistics.

  • Ministry of Education (2015a). Mathematics Curriculum (Notification No. 2015-74, Appendix 8). Seoul, Korea: Author.

  • Ministry of Education (2015b). Mathematics teachers’ guidebook 6–1. Seoul, Korea: Chunjae Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2015c). Mathematics textbook 6–1. Seoul, Korea: Chunjae Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011). Mathematics Curriculum (Notification No. 2011-361, Appendix 8). Seoul, Korea: Author.

  • Moritz, J. B., Watson, J. M. & Collis, K. F. (1996). Odds: Chance measurement in three contexts. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in Mathematics Education: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 390–397). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.

  • Moyer, P. S. & Milewicz, E. (2002). Learning to question: Categories of questioning used by preservice teachers during diagnostic mathematics interviews. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(4), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021251912775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, H. & Hannula, M. S. (2008). Individual prospective mathematics teachers: Studies on their professional growth. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teacher education (pp. 13–34). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1971). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (Original work published 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, L. H. (2007). Middle school and high school students’ probabilistic reasoning on coin tasks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 531–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ​Statistics Training Institute (2017). “Development of teaching-learning materials for high school practical statistics” to enhance statistical recognition. Seoul, Korea: Statistics Training Institute, Statistics Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohl, H. & Tarr, J. E. (2002). Developing notions of inference using probability simulation tools. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, J. E. (2002). Confounding effects of the phrase “50-50 chance” in making conditional probability judgments. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 24(4), 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, J. E. & Jones, G. A. (1997). A framework for assessing middle school students’ thinking in conditional probability and independence. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R., Sinclair, N. & Liljedahl, P. (2013). Lesson play in mathematics education: A tool for research and professional development. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Korea National University of Education, 250, Taeseongtabyeon-ro, Gangnae-myeon, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea

    Mimi Park

  2. 9/320. Department of Mathematics Education, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Eun-Jung Lee

Authors
  1. Mimi Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eun-Jung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun-Jung Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, M., Lee, EJ. Korean Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Abilities to Identify Equiprobability Bias and Teaching Strategies. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 17, 1585–1603 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9933-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9933-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation