Research apprenticeship experiences provide a uniquely authentic context for deepening participants’ understanding of the nature of science and encouraging them to choose STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) studies and careers. This study evaluated a STEM program for high school students who engaged in science research with the mentoring support of academic and industrial experts. The goals were to explore how graduates perceived the program as a factor affecting their choice to specialize in a STEM career and whether the findings demonstrate gender differences. Using the sequential mixed method, 24 students were interviewed, and then, the findings were used to develop a questionnaire to which 116 program graduates responded. The responses revealed four main themes of contribution: development in science learning, development of self-efficacy, effect on students’ choice of specializing in science and technology in the future, and sense of belonging to the residential area. The results indicate a positive correlation between the attitudes of students participating in the program and their expectation to pursue a STEM-related career. Statistically significant differences were found between the attitudes of the young men and women. The study provides a deeper understanding of the gender gaps in science education.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abraham, L. M. (2002). What do high school science students gain from field-based research apprenticeship programs? The Clearing House, 75, 229–232.
Anderson, D., Lucas, K. B., Ginns, I. S., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Development of knowledge about electricity and magnetism during a visit to a science museum and related post-visit activities. Science Education, 84, 658–679.
Atkins, M. J. (1993). Theories of learning and multimedia applications: An overview. Research Papers in Education, 8, 251–271.
Bailey, S. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: the AAUW report. New York, NY: Marlowe & Company.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359–373.
Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 70–102.
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2010). Quantifying the gender gap in science interests. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 523–550.
Barro, J. R. (2001). Human capital: growth, history, and policy. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 12–17.
Bencze, J. L., & Bowen, G. M. (2009). Student-teachers’ dialectically developed motivation for promoting student-led science projects. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 133–159.
Bouchey, H. A., & Harter, S. (2005). Reflected appraisals, academic self-perceptions, and math/science performance during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 673–686.
Bozdoğan, A. E., & Yalçın, N. (2009). Determining the influence of a science exhibition center training program on elementary pupils’ interest and achievement in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(1), 27–34.
Burgin, S. R., & Sadler, T. D. (2016). Learning nature of science concepts through a research apprenticeship program: A comparative study of three approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 31–59.
Burgin, S. R., Sadler, T. D., & Koroly, M. J. (2012). High school student participation in scientific research apprenticeships: Variation in and relationships among student experiences and outcomes. Research in Science Education, 42, 432–467.
Cabello, R., Sorrel, M. A., Fernández-Pinto, I., Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2016). Age and gender differences in ability emotional intelligence in adults: A cross-sectional study. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1486–1492.
Cameron, C. (2001). Promise or problem? A review of the literature on men working in early childhood services. Gender, Work and Organisation, 8, 430–454.
Campbell, A. M. (2002). The influences and factors of an undergraduate research program in preparing women for science careers (Unpublished dissertation). Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University.
Cavallo, A. M. L., & Laubach, T. (2001). Students’ science perceptions and enrollment decisions in differing learning cycle classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1029–1062.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, MI: LEA.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11.
Crane, V., Nicholson, H., Chen, M., & Bitgood, S. (1994). Informal science learning: What the research says about television, science museums and community-based projects. Hillsdale, MI: Science Press.
Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J. T., Miller-Friedmann, J. L., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2012). Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 63–79.
Das, R. P., & Sahu, T. L. (2015). Relationship between emotional intelligence and gender difference: An empirical study. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 8(9), 15–23.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582–601.
Dori, Y. J. & Sasson, I. (2013). A three-attribute transfer skills framework – Part I: Establishing the model and its relation to chemical education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice – CERP, 14, 363–375.
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–72.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, DC: Whalesback Books.
Falk, J. H., Scott, C., Dierking, L. D., Rennie, L. J., & Cohen, J. M. (2004). Interactives and visitor learning. Curator, 47, 171–198.
Feldman, A., Divoll, K. A., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2013). Becoming researchers: The participation of undergraduate and graduate students in scientific research groups. Science Education, 97, 218–243.
Furnham, A., Reeves, E., & Budhani, S. (2002). Parents think their sons are brighter than their daughters: Sex differences in parental self-estimations and estimations of their children’s multiple intelligences. Journal of General Psychology, 163, 24–39.
Glaserfeld, V. (1991). Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the radical constructivist position. In F. Steier (Ed.), Research and reflecting (pp. 12–29). London: Sage.
Gonzalez-Espada, W. J., & LaDue, D. S. (2006). Evaluation of the impact of the NWC REU program compared with other undergraduate research experiences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 541–549.
Hanushek, E., & Kimko, D. D. (2000). Schooling labor-force quality and the growth of nations. The American Economic Review, 90, 1208–1184.
Häussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 870–888.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.
Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls’ interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12, 447–465.
Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28, 87–112.
Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal and professional development. Science Education, 91, 36–74.
Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2002). Effect of the challenger experience on elementary children’s attitudes to science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 979–1000.
Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 53–83.
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turne, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133.
Jones, J., & Young, D. J. (1995). Perceptions of the relevance of mathematics and science: An Australian study. Research in Science Education, 25, 3–18.
Kane, J., & Mertz, J. (2012). Debunking the myth: Sex differences in math performance. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 59, 10–21.
Kelly, A. (Ed.). (1987). Science for girls? Milton Keynes, England and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Kiefer, A., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007). Implicit stereotypes, gender identification, and math-related outcomes: A prospective study of female college students. Psychological Science, 18, 13–18.
Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 27–50.
Lave, J. (1997). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological (pp. 17–35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49.
Li, Q. (1999). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: A review. Education Research, 41, 63–76.
Linn, M. C. (1980a). Free choice experiences: How do they help children learn? Science Education, 64, 237–248.
Linn, M. C. (1980b). When do adolescents reason? European Journal of Science Education, 2, 429–440.
Linn, M. C., & Pulos, S. (1983). Male-female differences in predicting displaced volume: Strategy usage, aptitude relationships and experience influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 86–96.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31, 313–327.
Lorenzo, M., Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2006). Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom. American Journal of Physics, 74, 118–122.
Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691–720.
Marshall, C. S., & Reihartz, J. (1997). Gender issues in the classroom. Clearinghouse, 70(6), 333–338.
Martin, A. J. (2001). The student motivation scale: A tool for measuring and enhancing motivation. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 11, 1–20.
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Implications for educators (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Mayer, R. E., & Whitrock, M. C. (1996). Problem-solving transfer. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 47–62). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London, England: King’s College.
Nagowah, L., & Nagowah, S. (2009). A reflection on the dominant learning theories: Behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism. The International Journal of Learning, 16, 279–286.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a conceptual framework for new K-12 science education standards. Board on science education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., . . . Kesebir, S. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10593–10597.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.
Pedretti, E. (2002). T. Kuhn Meets T. Rex: Critical conversations and new directions in science centers and science museums. Studies in Science Education, 37(1), 1–41.
Peeters, J. (2008). The construction of a new profession. A European perspective on professionalism in ECEC. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SWP.
Price, S., & Hein, G. E. (1991). More than a field trip: Science programs for elementary school groups at museums. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 505–519.
Rennie, L. J., & McLafferty, T. P. (1995). Using visits to interactive science and technology centers, museums, aquariua, and zoos to promote learning in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6, 175–185.
Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Achieving standards in urban system reform: An example of a sixth grade project-based science curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 669–692.
Rosenfeld, M., & Rosenfeld, S. (2006). Understanding teacher responses to constructivist learning environments: Challenges and resolutions. Science Education, 90, 385–399.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 235–256.
Sasson, I. (2014). The role of informal science centers in science education: attitudes, skills, and self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 4(3), 167–180.
Sasson, I. & Cohen, D. (2013). Assessment for effective intervention: Enrichment science academic program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 718–728.
Sasson, I. & Dori, Y. (2006). Fostering near and far transfer in the chemistry case-based laboratory environment. In G. Clarebout & J. Elen (Eds.), Avoiding simplicity, confronting complexity: Advance in studying and designing powerful (computer-based) learning environments (pp. 275–286). Rotterdam: Sense Publication.
Sasson, I. & Dori, Y. (2011). Transfer skills and their case-based assessment. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), The second international handbook of science education (pp. 691–710). Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.
Sasson, I. & Dori, Y. (2015). A three-attribute transfer skills framework – Part II: Applying and assessing the model in science education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice – CERP, 16, 154–167.
Seymour, E., Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Deantoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three year study. Science Education, 88, 493–534.
Simon, S., Johnson, S., Cavellt, S., & Parsons, T. (2011). Promoting argumentation in primary science contexts: An analysis of students’ interactions in formal and informal learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 440–453.
Staff, J., Messersmith, E. E., & Steinberg, L. (2009). Adolescents in the world of work. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 270–313). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Toh, K. A., & Goh, N. K. (2003). Reform in science and technology curricula. In J. P. Keeves & R. Watanabe (Eds.), International handbook of educational research in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 1243–1256). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting junior high school students’ interest in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 47–58.
Warin, J., & Gannerud, E. (2014). Gender, teaching and care: A comparative global conversation. Gender and Education, 26, 193–199.
Weaver-Hightower, M. (2003). The “boy turn” in research on gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73, 471–498.
Yair, G. (2003). Decisive moments and key experiences: Expanding paradigmatic boundaries in the study of school effects. In C. A. Torres & A. Antikainen (Eds.), The international handbook on the sociology of education: An international assessment of new research and theory (pp. 124–142). Lanham, MD: Rowman.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.
This work was supported by the Milgrom Foundation, University of Chicago.
About this article
Cite this article
Sasson, I. Participation in Research Apprenticeship Program: Issues Related to Career Choice in STEM. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 17, 467–482 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9873-8
- Gender differences
- Research apprenticeship program
- STEM career