Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In-Service Teachers’ Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Mental Calculations with Rational Numbers

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to examine content knowledge (CK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of Greek teachers in number sense and specifically in mental calculations with rational numbers (fractions, decimals and percentages). Examined within the framework of CK were the type of strategies employed by teachers and the extent of the repertoire of these strategies, which provides an indication of their flexibility. Teachers’ CK performance in mental calculations with rational numbers was compared with the extent of their strategic repertoire as well as with the PCK they employed when teaching mental calculations with rational numbers. The data revealed that the teachers’ high CK performance in mental calculations with rational numbers is positively influenced by the existence of an extensive strategic repertoire. Furthermore, it was found that a high CK performance and an extensive strategic repertoire in mental calculations with rational numbers positively influence the PCK of mental calculations with rational numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understanding that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90, 449–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behr, M. J., Wachsmuth, I., Post, T. R., & Lesh, R. (1984). Order and equivalence of rational numbers: A clinical teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behr, M. J., Khoury, H. A., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1997). Conceptual units analysis of preservice elementary school teachers’ strategies on a rational number as operator task. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 48–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 194–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caglayan, G., & Olive, J. (2011). Referential commutativity: Preservice K-8 teachers’ visualization of fraction operations using pattern block. In L. R. Wiest & T. Lamberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 303–311). Reno, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callingham, R. & Watson, J. (2008). Research in mental computation: Multiple perspectives. Brisbane: Post Pressed. ISBN: 978–1–921214-36-3.

  • Caney, A. & Watson, J. M. (2003). Mental computation for part-whole number operations. Paper presented at the joint conferences of the Australian Association for Research in Education and the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Auckland. Retrieved September 3, 2004 from http://www.aare.edu.au/03pap/alpha.htm.

  • Carraher, T. N., Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (1987). Written and oral mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinnappan, M. (2000). Preservice teachers’ understanding and representation of fractions in a JavaBars environment. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(3), 234–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. M., & Roche, A. (2009). Students’ fraction comparison strategies as a window into robust understanding and possible pointers for instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K., & Lesh, R. (1988). Rational number knowledge of preservice elementary education teachers. In M. Behr (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for Psychology of mathematics education (pp. 425–431). DeKalb, Il: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depaepe, F., Torbeyns, J., Vermeersch, N., Janssens, D., Janssen, R., Kelchtermans, G., Verschaffel, L., & Dooren, W. (2015). Teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge on rational numbers: A comparison of prospective elementary and lower secondary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domoney, B. (2002). Student teachers’ understanding of rational number: Part-whole and numerical constructs. Research in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., & Franke, L. M. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147–164). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajander, A., & Holm, J. (2011). Mathematics for teaching and learning: Developing teachers’ conceptual understanding of elementary mathematics. In L. R. Wiest & T. Lamberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1664–1672). Reno, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerslake, D. (1986). Fractions: Children’s strategies and errors: A report of the strategies and error in secondary mathematics project. Windson, England: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 90–106.

  • Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 716–725.

  • Lamon, S. J. (1999). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire, P., & Siegler, R. S. (1995). Four aspects of strategic change: Contributions to children’s learning of multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemonidis, Ch. (2015). Mental Computation and Estimation: Implications for mathematics education research, teaching and learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Lemonidis, Ch., & Kaiafa, I. (2014). Fifth and sixth-grade students' number sense in rational numbers and its relation with problem-solving ability. MENON: Journal Of Educational Research. 1st Thematic Issue, 61–74.

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ knowledge of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, B. L., & Steen, L. A. (Eds.). (2003). Quantitative literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges. Princeton, NJ: The National Council on Education and the Disciplines.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, A. (2004). Where we are today? In A. McIntosh & L. Sparrow (Eds.), Beyond written computation (pp. 3–14). Perth, Australia: Mathematics, Science & Technology Education Centre, Edith Cowan University.

  • McIntosh, A., Reys, B., Reys, R., Bana, J., & Farrell, B. (1997). Number sense in school mathematics: Student performance in four countries. Perth: MASTEC, Edith Cowan University.

  • McIntosh, A. J., De Nardi, E., & Swan, P. (1994). Think mathematically. Melbourne: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of fractions. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1080–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2009). Paper 3: Understanding rational numbers and intensive quantities. In T. Nunes, P. Bryant, & A. Watson (Eds.), Key understandings in mathematics learning. London: Nuffield Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olanoff, D., Lo, J. J., & Tobias, J. M. (2014). Mathematical content knowledge for teaching elementary mathematics: A focus on fractions. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(2), 267–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, T., Behr, M. J., & Lesh, R. (1986). Research-based observations about children’s learning of rational number concepts. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 8(1), 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, T., Harel, G., Behr, M., & Lesh, R. (1988). Intermediate teachers knowledge of rational number concepts. In Fennema et al. (Eds.), Papers from first Wisconsin symposium for research on teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 194–219). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, T., Cramer, K., Behr, M., Lesh, R., & Harel, G. (1993). Curriculum implications of research on the learning, teaching and assessing of rational number concepts. In T. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 327–361). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reys, B. J. (1985). Mental computation. Arithmetic Teacher, 32(6), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reys, B. J. (1994). Promoting number sense in middle grades. Teaching Mathematics in the Middle School, 1(2), 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reys, R. E. (1984). Mental computation and estimation: Past, present, and future. The Elementary School Journal, 84(5), 546–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senk, S. L., Tatto, M. T., Reckase, M., Rowley, G., Peck, R., & Bankov, K. (2012). Knowledge of future primary teachers for teaching mathematics: An international comparative study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2005). Development of numerical estimation: A review. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 197–212). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and younger adults’ strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In T. Simon & G. Halford (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 31–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowder, J. (1992). Estimation and number sense. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–389). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowder, J. T. (1990). Mental computation and number sense. Arithmetic Teacher, 37(7), 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafylidou, S., & Vosniadou, S. (2004). The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and Instruction, 14, 503–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen, L. A. (Ed.). (2001). Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy. Washington, DC: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streefland, L. (1991). Fractions in realistic mathematics education: A paradigm of developmental research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s conceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trafton, P. R. (1992). Using number sense to develop mental computation and computational estimation. In C. J. Irons (Ed.), Challenging children to think when they compute (pp. 78–92). Brisbane: Center for Mathematics and Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsao, Y. L. (2004). Exploring the connections among number sense, mental computation performance, and the written computation performance of elementary preservice school teachers. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 1(12), 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsao, Y. L. (2005). The number sense of preservice elementary school teachers. College Student Journal, 39(4), 647–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnuklu, E. B., & Yesildere, S. (2007). The pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics: Pre-service primary mathematics teachers’ perspectives in Turkey. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschaffel, L., Luwel, K., Torbeyns, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2009). Conceptualizing, investigating, and enhancing adaptive expertise in elementary mathematics education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(3), 335–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M. (2004). Quantitative literacy in the media: An arena for problem solving. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 60(1), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitacre, I., & Nickerson, S. D. (2011). Prospective elementary teachers develop improved number sense in reasoning about fraction magnitude. In L. R. Wiest & T. Lamberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of mathematics education (pp. 559–567). Reno, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. C. (2003). Teaching and learning number sense—an intervention study of fifth grade students in Taiwan. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. C. (2005). Number sense strategies used by sixth grade students in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 31(3), 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. C. (2007). Investigating the strategies used by preservice teachers in Taiwan when responding to number sense questions. School Science and Mathematics, 107, 293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. C., & Reys, R. E. (2001). One fraction problem: Many solution paths. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(3), 164–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. C., Reys, R. E., & Reys, B. J. (2009). Number sense strategies used by pre-service teachers in Taiwan. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 383–403.

  • Zhou, A., Peverly, S. T., & Xin, T. (2006). Knowing and teaching fractions: A cross-cultural study of American and Chinese mathematics teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 438–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Primary Education, University of Western Macedonia, Kozani, Greece

    Charalampos Lemonidis, Helen Tsakiridou & Ioanna Meliopoulou

  2. 182 K. Karamanli, 542 48, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Charalampos Lemonidis

Authors
  1. Charalampos Lemonidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helen Tsakiridou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ioanna Meliopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charalampos Lemonidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lemonidis, C., Tsakiridou, H. & Meliopoulou, I. In-Service Teachers’ Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Mental Calculations with Rational Numbers. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 16, 1127–1145 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9822-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9822-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation