Research on the impact of the integration of technologies such as iPads on primary students’ attitudes and engagement in mathematics is limited. Further, there have been claims that teachers’ pedagogical choices can strongly influence the effectiveness of iPads for engaging students in mathematics. This paper presents an investigation of the influence of teaching and learning mathematics with iPads on students’ attitudes and engagement in mathematics. The participants in this study were students in a large urban primary school, implementing an iPad program for teaching and learning across the curriculum. Surveys with five-point Likert-type items were used to measure students’ attitudes to mathematics. Students from Years 2 to 6 completed the survey at the beginning and end of two consecutive school years. Survey results suggested that iPad use in mathematics has the potential to impact positively on students’ attitudes to mathematics. At the end of the second year of the study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with teachers and students. The interview responses confirmed that iPads had a positive influence on students’ engagement and attitudes to mathematics, and that the pedagogical approaches utilised by teachers for embedding iPads in their mathematics lessons contributed positively to these outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Adelson, J. L. & McCoach, D. B. (2011). Development and psychometric properties of the Math and Me Survey: Measuring third through sixth graders’ attitudes toward mathematics. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Development, 44(4), 225–247.
Attard, C. (2011). “My favourite subject is maths. For some reason no-one really agrees with me”: Student perspectives of mathematics teaching and learning in the upper primary classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(3), 363–377.
Attard, C. (2013a). iPads and primary mathematics. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 18(4), 38–40.
Attard, C. (2013b). Thanks for the iPads, but what do we do with them? Integrating iPads into the teaching and learning of primary mathematics. Curriculum and Leadership Journal, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/leader/integrating_ipads_into_the_teaching_and_learning_o,35917.html?issueID=12708.
Attard, C. (2014). ‘I don’t like it, I don’t love it, but I do it and I don’t mind’: Introducing a framework for engagement with mathematics. Curriculum Perspectives, 34(3), 1–14.
Attard, C. (2015). Engagement and mathematics: What does it look like in your classroom? Journal of Professional Learning, Semester 2. Retrieved from http://cpl.asn.au/journal/semester-2-2015/engagement-and-mathematics-what-does-it-look-like-in-your-classroom.
Attard, C. & Curry, C. (2012). Exploring the use of iPads to engage young students with mathematics. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics Education: Expanding Horizons. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA) (pp. 75-82). Singapore: MERGA.
Attard, C. & Northcote, M. (2011). Mathematics on the move: Using mobile technologies to support student learning (Part 1). Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 16(4), 29–31.
Barkatsas, A., Kasimatis, K. & Gialamas, V. (2009). Learning secondary mathematics with technology: Exploring the complex interrelationship between students’ attitudes, engagement, gender, and achievement. Computers and Education, 52, 562–570.
Brace, N., Kemp, R. & Snelgar, R. (2009). SPSS for psychologists. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Routledge Falmer.
Commonwealth of Australia (2008). National numeracy review report. Canberra, Australia: Author.
Couse, L. & Chen, D. (2010). A tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(1), 75–98.
Donaldson, A. (2012). It’s about the learning, not the toys. TechTrends, 56(4), 3–4.
Dowker, A., Bennett, K. & Smith, L. (2012). Attitudes to mathematics in primary school children. Child Development Research, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/124939
Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D. & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.
Fabian, K., Topping, K. J. & Barron, I. G. (2016). Mobile technology and mathematics: Effects on students’ attitudes, engagement, and achievement. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(1), 77–104.
Franklin, T. & Peng, L.-W. (2008). Mobile math: Math educators and students engage in mobile learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(2), 69–80.
Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P. & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R. & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics—A “hopeless issue”? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497–514.
Goos, M. & Bennison, A. (2008). Surveying the technology landscape: Teachers’ use of technology in secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(3), 102–130.
Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2012). Auditing the numeracy demands of the Australian curriculum. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics Education: Expanding Horizons: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA) (pp.314-321). Singapore: MERGA.
Handal, B., Novak, A., Watson, K., Maher, M., MacNich, J., & Eddles-Hirsch, K. (2014). Numeracy education through mobile apps. Middle Years of Schooling Association, 14(1), 28-37. Retrieved from www.adolescentsuccess.org.au.
Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Building Teacher Quality: The ACER Annual Conference, Melbouren, Australia.
Ireland, G. V. & Woollerton, M. (2010). The impact of the iPad and iPhone on education. Journal of Bunkyo Gakuin University Department of Foreign Languages and Bunkyo Gakuin College, 10, 31–48.
Kunzler, G. (2011, September 11). iPads motivate students to learn, improve the education experience. iPad News. Retrieved from http://www.mactrast.com/2011/11/ipads-motivate-students-to-learn-improve-the-education-experience.
Kyanka-Maggart, J. (2013). iPads, motivation, self-efficacy, engagement in upper elementary school mathematics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Baker University, Baldwin City, KS.
Kyriacou, C. & Goulding, M. (2006). A systematic review of strategies to raise pupils’ motivational effort in Key Stage 4 mathematics. London, United Kingdom: EPPI Centre, Institute of Education.
Larkin, K. & Jorgensen, H. (2015). ‘I hate maths: Why do we need to do maths?’ Using iPad video diaries to investigate attitudes and emotions towards mathematics in Year 3 and Year 6 students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(5), 925–944. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9621-x.
Linnenbrink, E. A. & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119–137.
McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Science Education, 15, 625–632.
Noyes, A. (2012). It matters which class you are in: Student-centred teaching and the enjoyment of learning mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 273–290.
Oliver, K. & Corn, J. (2008). Student-reported differences in technology use and skills after implementation of one-to-one computing. Educational Media International, 45(3), 215–229.
O’Malley, P., Jenkins, S., Wesley, B., Donehower, C., Rabuck, D. & Lewis, M. (2013). Effectiveness of using iPads to build math fluency. Paper presented at 2013 Council for Exceptional Children Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX.
Pierce, R. & Ball, L. (2009). Perceptions that may affect teachers’ intention to use technology in secondary mathematics classes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 299–317.
Pintrich, P. R. & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Preckel, F., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R. & Kleine, M. (2008). Gender differences in gifted and average-ability students: Comparing girls’ and boys’ achievement, self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 146–159.
Shah, N. (2011). iPads become learning tools for students with disabilities. Education Week, 5(1), 12.
Singer, J. (2015). The effects of iPad devices on elementary school students’ mathematics achievement and attitudes Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Northeastern University Digital Raspitory Service (D20198325).
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Usher, E. & Pajares, F. (2006). Inviting confidence in school: Invitations as a critical source of the academic self-efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 12(7), 7–16.
van Oostveen, R., Muirhead, W. & Goodman, W. M. (2011). Tablet PCs and reconceptualising learning with technology: A case study in higher education. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 8(2), 78–93.
The author would like to thanks the teachers and students who participated in this study and Dr. Geoff Hilton for his contribution and helpful comments on drafts of this manuscript.
Appendix. Factor Analysis for the Maths and Me Surveys
Appendix. Factor Analysis for the Maths and Me Surveys
About this article
Cite this article
Hilton, A. Engaging Primary School Students in Mathematics: Can iPads Make a Difference?. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 16, 145–165 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9771-5
- Primary school mathematics
- iPads in mathematics
- Attitudes to mathematics