The Transition from School to University in Mathematics: Which Influence Do School-Related Variables Have?

Article

Abstract

Particularly in mathematics, the transition from school to university often appears to be a substantial hurdle in the individual learning biography. Differences between the characters of school mathematics and scientific university mathematics as well as different demands related to the learning cultures in both institutions are discussed as possible reasons for this phenomenon. If these assumptions hold, the transition from school to university could not be considered as a continuous mathematical learning path because it would require a realignment of students’ learning strategies. In particular, students could no longer rely on the effective use of school-related individual resources like knowledge, interest, or self-concept. Accordingly, students would face strong challenges in mathematical learning processes at the beginning of their mathematics study at university. In this contribution, we examine these assumptions by investigating the role of individual mathematical learning prerequisites of 182 first-semester university students majoring in mathematics. In line with the assumptions, our results indicate only a marginal influence of school-related mathematical resources on the study success of the first semester. In contrast, specific precursory knowledge related to scientific mathematics and students’ abilities to develop adequate learning strategies turn out as main factors for a successful transition phase. Implications for the educational practice will be discussed.

Keywords

Individual learning processes Role of learning prerequisites Study success Transition school – university 

Supplementary material

10763_2016_9744_MOESM1_ESM.docx (46 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 46 kb)

References

  1. Bergsten, C. (2007). Investigating quality of undergraduate mathematics lectures. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(3), 48–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bressoud, D., Mesa, V. & Rasmussen, C. (Eds.). (2015). Insights and Recommendations from the MAA National Study of College Calculus. Washington, DC: MAA Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, S.-K., Yeh, Y.-C., Hwang, F.-M. & Lin, S. S. J. (2013). The relationship between academic self-concept and achievement: A multicohort–multioccasion study. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H. & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, M. & Lovric, M. (2009). Understanding secondary-tertiary transition in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(6), 755–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dieter, M. (2012). Studienabbruch und Studienfachwechsel in der Mathematik: Quantitative Bezifferung und empirische Untersuchung von Bedingungsfaktoren [Drop-out and change of study in mathematics: Quantification and empirical analysis of factors] (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-30759/Dieter_Miriam.pdf.
  7. Eley, M. G. & Meyer, J. H. F. (2004). Modelling the influences on learning outcomes of study processes in university mathematics. Higher Education, 47, 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engelbrecht, J. (2010). Adding structure to the transition process to advanced mathematical activity. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(2), 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fenollar, P., Román, S. & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 873–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R. & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gueudet, G. (2008). Investigating the secondary-tertiary transition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hailikari, T., Nevgi, A. & Komulainen, E. (2008). Academic self‐beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of student achievement in Mathematics: A structural model. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 28(1), 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halverscheid, S. & Pustelnik, K. (2013). Studying math at the university: Is dropout predictable? In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 417–424). Kiel, Germany: PME.Google Scholar
  14. Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1–2), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hannula, M. S., Maijala, H. & Pehkonen, E. (2004). Development of understanding and self-confidence in mathematics; grades 5–8. In M. Johnsen Høines & A. B. Fuglestadt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 17–24). Bergen, Norway: Univ. College.Google Scholar
  16. Hattermann & A. Peter-Koop (Eds.), Transformation - A Fundamental Idea of Mathematics Education (pp.29-50). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Hoyles, C., Newman, K. & Noss, R. (2001). Changing patterns of transition from school to university mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(6), 829–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Köller, O., Baumert, J. & Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 448–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Köller, O., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O. & Baumert, J. (2006). Zum Zusammenspiel von schulischer Leistung, Selbstkonzept und Interesse in der gymnasialen Oberstufe [The interaction of school achievement, self-concept, and interest in the upper secondary school]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20(1/2), 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D. & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luk, H. S. (2005). The gap between secondary school and university mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(2–3), 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Malmivuori, M.-L. (2006). Affect and self-regulation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Baumert, J. & Köller, O. (2007). The big-fish-little-pond effect: Persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 631–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O. & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76(2), 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(3), 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nagy, G. (2006). Berufliche Interessen, kognitive und fachgebundene Kompetenzen: Ihre Bedeutung für die Studienfachwahl und die Bewährung im Studium [Vocational interests, cognitive and scholastic abilities: Their role in choice of major and success at university] (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/diss/receive/FUDISS_thesis_000000002714.
  28. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W. & Perry, R. P. (2002). Positive emotions in education. In E. Frydenberg (Ed.), Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions, and challenges (pp. 149–173). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rach, S. & Heinze, A. (2011). Studying Mathematics at the University: The Influence of Learning Strategies. In B. Ubuz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4), (pp. 9-16). Ankara, Turkey: PME.Google Scholar
  30. Rasmussen, C. & Ellis, J. (2013). Who is switching out of calculus and why. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4) (pp. 73–80). Kiel, Germany: PME.Google Scholar
  31. Richardson, M., Abraham, C. & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schiefele, U., Streblow, L. & Brinkmann, J. (2007). Aussteigen oder Durchhalten: Was unterscheidet Studienabbrecher von anderen Studierenden? [Dropping out or persevering: What distinguishes university dropouts from other students?]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 39(3), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seaton, M., Parker, P., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G. & Yeung, A. S. (2014). The reciprocal relations between self-concept, motivation and achievement: Juxtaposing academic self-concept and achievement goal orientations for mathematics success. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Selden, A. (2005). New developments and trends in tertiary mathematics education: Or, more of the same? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(2–3), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Swanson, J. L. & Fouad, N. A. (1999). Applying theories of person-environment fit to the transition from school to work. The Career Development Quarterly, 47(4), 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tall, D. (1991). The psychology of advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 3–21). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Tall, D. & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(7), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomas,M., Klymchuk, S., Hong, Y. Y., Kerr, S., McHardy, J., Murphy, P., Watson, P. (2010). The transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics education. Wellington, New Zealand: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/sites/default/files/projects/9262SummaryReport.pdf.
  39. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O. & Baumert, J. (2006). Self-esteem, academic self-concept, and achievement: How the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 334–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trigwell, K., Ashwin, P. & Millan, E. S. (2013). Evoked prior learning experience and approach to learning as predictors of academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Valle, A., Cabanach, R. G., Núnez, J. C., González-Pienda, J., Rodríguez, S. & Pineiro, I. (2003). Cognitive, motivational, and volitional dimensions of learning: An empirical test of a hypothetical model. Research in Higher Education, 44(5), 557–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vollstedt, M., Heinze, A., Gojdka, K. & Rach, S. (2014). Framework for Examining the Transformation of Mathematics and Mathematics Learning in the Transition from School to University. In S. Rezat, M.Google Scholar
  44. Wagner, D. (2011). Mathematische Kompetenzanforderungen in Schule und Hochschule: Die Rolle des formal-abstrahierenden Denkens [Mathematical competence requirements in school and university: The role of formal-abstract thinking]. In R. Haug & L. Holzäpfel (Eds.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2011 (pp. 879–882). Münster, Germany: WTM Verlag.Google Scholar
  45. Weber, K. (2004). Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: A case study of one professor’s lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weber, K. (2008). The role of affect in learning real analysis: A case study. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weinstein, C. E. & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. A project of the American educational research association (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Witzke, I. (2015). Different understandings of mathematics. An epistemological approach to bridge the gap between school and university mathematics. In E. Barbin, U. T. Jankvist & T. H. Kjeldsen (Eds.), ESU 7 (pp. 304–322). Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish School of Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IPNKielGermany

Personalised recommendations