Abstract
This paper investigates the use of multimodal representations to assess biological understanding in the final senior secondary school public examination in New South Wales, Australia. The investigation emanates from a larger Australian study concerned with the impact of disciplinary and technological innovations on science pedagogy, particularly in molecular genetics where much knowledge is represented in modalities other than, or in conjunction with, language and traditional print-based texts and visuals. The availability of digital technologies and their affordances for the learning and teaching of senior high school Biology now makes it realistic for examiners to include multimodal representations in assessment tasks. A qualitative analysis of final-year Biology examination papers from 2001 to 2013 identified and classified the multimodal representations included in this written external examination. Findings indicate that despite the ready availability of multimodal, multimedia representations in classroom learning and curriculum materials, and evidence of students’ engagement with ICT, the high-stakes examinations make little use of such resources. A consequence of this mismatch between curriculum outcomes and assessment tools is that students may be disadvantaged because their in-depth knowledge and understanding of biological concepts is not effectively demonstrated through traditional pen-and-paper tests. A move towards a range of alternative assessment formats is one way to ensure that assessment aligns with multimodal learning in the classroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bezemer, J. & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195.
Bezemer, J., Diamantopoulou, S., Jewitt, C., Kress, G., & Mavers, D. (2012). Using a social semiotic approach to multimodality: Researching learning in schools, museums and hospitals (Working paper No. 01/12). Retreived from National Centre for Research Methods website: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2258/. Accessed 13 Feb 2014.
Board of Studies New South Wales (2001–2013). NSW Higher School Certificate (HSC) Examination Papers [online]. Sydney, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/hsc_exams.
Board of Studies New South Wales (2009). Biology Stage 6 syllabus. HSC syllabuses [online]. Sydney, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/syllabus_hsc/biology.html.
Crook, S., Sharma, M. & Wilson, R. (2015). An evaluation of the impact of 1:1 laptops on student attainment in senior high school sciences. International Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 272–293.
Genetic Science Learning Center (2014, January 8). Learn.Genetics. Retrieved February 03, 2014, from http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/.
Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner & M. Nakhlel (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Springer.
Hand, B., Gunel, M. & Ulu, C. (2009). Sequencing embedded multimodal representations in a writing to learn approach to the teaching of electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 225–247.
Harrison, C. (2003). Visual social semiotics: Understanding how still images make meaning. Technical Communication, 50(1), 46–60.
Hedberg, J., Van Bergen, P., Freebody, P., Nichols, K., Van Rooy, W., Barton, G., & Chan, E. (2008). Transforming through technologies the modalities of learning: new life sciences in secondary schooling. Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. 6322–6330.
Jewitt, C. (2003). Rethinking assessment: Multimodality, literacy and computer-mediated learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(1), 83–102.
Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32, 241–267. doi:10.3102/0091732X07310586.
Johnson, D. & Kress, G. (2003). Globalisation, literacy and society: Redesigning pedagogy and assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(1), 5–14.
Klassen, S. (2006). Contextual assessment in science education: Background, issues and policy. Science Education, 90, 820–851.
Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2005). Student representational competence and self-assessment when solving physics problems. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 1(1), 010104. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010104
Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2006). Effects of representation on students solving physics problems: A fine-grained characterization. Physical review special topics - Physics education research, 2(1), 010106. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010106
Korpershoek, H., Kuyper, H. & Van Der Werk, G. (2015). The relation between students’ math and reading ability and their mathematics, physics, and chemistry examination grades in secondary education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 1013–1037.
Kress, G. (2009). Assessment in the perspective of a social semiotic theory of multimodal teaching and learning. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century (pp. 19–41). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J. & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London, United Kingdom: Continuum.
Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Lemke, J. (2002). Multimedia semiotics: Genres for science education and scientific literacy. In M. Schleppegrell & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages (pp. 21–44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lemke, J. (2003). Teaching all the languages of science: Words, symbols, images, and actions [Electronic Version]. Retrieved from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jaylemke/papers/barcelon.htm.
Lemke, J. (2005). Towards critical multimedia literacy: Technology, research and politics. In M. McKenna, D. Reinking, L. Labbo & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology (Vol. 2): Erlbaum.
Liu, X. & Fulmer, G. (2008). Alignment between the science curriculum and assessment in selected NY state regents exams. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 373–383.
McClean, P., Johnson, C., Rogers, R., Daniels, L., Reber, J., Slator, B. M.,... & White, A. (2005). Molecular and cellular biology animations: Development and impact on student learning. Cell Biology Education, 4, 169–179.
Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G. & Stavy, R. (2006). Effect of bead and illustration models on high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 500–529.
Schonborn, K. & Bogeholz, S. (2009). Knowledge transfer in biology and translation across representations: Experts’ views and challenges for learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 931–955.
Thorburn, M. & Collins, D. (2006). Accuracy and authenticity of oral and written assessments in high-stakes school examinations. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 3–25.
Van Rooy, W. S. (2012). Using information and communication technology (ICT) to the maximum: Learning and teaching biology with limited digital technologies. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(1), 65–80.
Venville, G. & Donovan, J. (2008). How pupils use a model for abstract concepts in genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 43(1), 6–14.
Vogler, K. E. & Carnes, G. N. (2014). Comparing the impact of a high school exit examination on biology teachers’ instructional practices. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8(2), 36–67.
Wilder, A. & Brinkerhoff, J. (2007). Supporting representational competence in high school biology with computer-based biomolecular visualizations. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(1), 5–26.
Wyatt-Smith, C. M. & Cumming, J. J. (2003). Curriculum literacies: expanding domains of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(1), 47–59. doi:10.1080/09695940.
Acknowledgments
The authors kindly acknowledge the Board of Studies, Teaching and Educational Standards New South Wales for granting permission to reproduce the included images from the HSC Biology Examination papers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Rooy, W.S., Chan, E. Multimodal Representations in Senior Biology Assessments: A Case Study of NSW Australia. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 15, 1237–1256 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9741-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9741-y