Relationships Between Student Perception of Teacher-Student Relations and PISA Results in Mathematics and Science
Teacher-student relations have a significant correlation with student motivation, academic performance and discipline. For example, the meta-analysis by Hattie (2009) revealed an effect size of d = 0.72 for the effect of relations on achievement, and the meta-analysis by Finn, Schrodt, Witt, Elledge, Jernberg & Larson (Communication Education, 58(4), 516–537, 2009) showed a correlation of 0.55 between the perceived care by teachers and student achievement. These were established by comparing students, but comparisons of schools or countries with high or low levels of teacher-student relations are missing. The present paper analyses the correlation between teacher-student relations and Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 results in science and mathematics on three levels: student, school and country level. The study shows a weak positive relationship (correlations up to 0.16) at the student level, and a positive relationship (up to 0.34) at school level. The multilevel analysis revealed a negative relationship between teacher-student relations and PISA results (r = −.51) at the country level. To understand the negative relationship, also known as an ecological fallacy, the countries were grouped into geographical regions in which the relationship was insignificant and the positive effect of teacher-student relations was found by comparing with some neighboring countries. Implications for practice and further studies are proposed on the basis of these findings.
KeywordsEcological fallacy Multilevel analysis Physics and mathematics education PISA Teacher-student relations
This research was supported by the European Social Fund No 1.2.0302.09-004.
We are also thankful to Karin Täht for the data analysis.
- Adams, R. & Wu, M. (Eds.) (2002). PISA 2000 Technical Report. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/33688233.pdf.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Loss. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Buckley, J. (2009). Cross-national response styles in international educational assessments: Evidence from PISA 2006. Retrieved from https://edsurveys.rti.org/PISA/documents/Buckley_PISAresponsestyle.pdf.
- Collinson, V., Killeavy, M. & Stephenson, H. (1999). Exemplary teachers: Practicing an ethic of care in England, Ireland, and the United States. Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 5, 349–366.Google Scholar
- Connell, J. P. & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology, 22 (pp. 43–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Database—PISA (2009). Retrieved from http://pisa2009.acer.edu.au/downloads.php.
- Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Fast, L. A., Lewis, J. L., Bryant, M. J., Bocian, K. A., Cardullo, R. A., Rettig, M. & Hammond, K. A. (2010). Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 729–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Finney, J. W., Humphreys, K., Kivlahan, D. R. & Harris, A. H. S. (2011). Why health care process performance measures can have different relationships to outcomes for patients and hospitals: Understanding the ecological fallacy. American Journal of Public Health, 101(9), 1635–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fisher, D. & Rickards, T. (1998). Associations between teacher-student interpersonal behaviour and student attitude to mathematics. Mathematics Education Research, 10(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
- Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Henno, I. (2015). Loodusteaduste õppimisest ja õpetamisest Eesti koolides Rahvusvaheliste võrdlusuuringute taustal [Science learning and teaching in Estonian schools behind international comparative studies]. Tallinn, Estonian: Tallinn University (In Estonian).Google Scholar
- Kamens, D.H. & Benavot, A. (2011). National, regional and international learning assessments: trends among developing countries, 1960–2009. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(2), 285–300. Retrieved from doi: 10.1080/14767724.2011.577337.
- Korthagen, K., Klaassen, C. & Russell, T. (2000). New learning in teacher education. In R. J. Simons, J. van der Linden & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 243–259). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Google Scholar
- Krips, H. (2014). Õpetaja Suhtlemiskompetentsusest ja Selle Arendamisest Õpetajakoolituses [Teachers` Communication Competence and its Development in Teacher Training]. In Edgar Krull et al. (Eds.), Õpetajate Professionaalne Areng ja Selle Toetemine (pp. 103–117). Estonia: Eesti Ülikoolide Kirjastus.Google Scholar
- La Paro, K. M. & Pianta, R. C. (2003). CLASS: Classroom Assessment Scoring System. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
- Loogma, K., Ruus, V. R., Talts, L. & Poom-Valickis, K. (2009). Õpetaja professionaalsus ning tõhusama õpetamis- ja õppimiskeskkonna loomine. OECD rahvusvahelise õpetamise ja õppimise uuringu TALIS tulemused. [Teacher’s professionalism and creating more effective teaching and learning environment. The results of OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey]. Tallinn, Estonian: Tallinna Ülikooli haridusuuringute keskus. [In Estonian].Google Scholar
- Marzano, R. J. & Marzano, J. S. (2003). The key to classroom management. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 6–13.Google Scholar
- Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S. & Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom management that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
- Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2010a). PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do—Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume I). Paris, France: Author. Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2010b). PISA 2009 Results: What Makes a School Successful?—Resources, Policies and Practices (Volume IV). Paris, France: Author. Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012). PISA 2009 Technical Report. Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
- Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L. & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529.Google Scholar
- Säälik, Ü., Mikk, J., Krips, H. & Kalk, K. (2014). Õpilaste poolt õpetaja käitumisviisidele antavate hinnangute seostest õpilaste õpihuvi ning õpieduga [The relationship between stdents` assessments of teachers` behaviour and students` interest in learning and success]. In E. Krull et al. (Eds.), Õpetajate professionaalne areng ja selle toetamine (pp. 83–102). Estonia: Eesti Ülikoolide Kirjastus.Google Scholar
- Sanders, M. G. & Jordan, W. J. (2000). Student-Teacher relations and academic achievement in high school. In M. G. Sanders (Ed.), Schooling students placed at risk (pp. 53–68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=lSltA45YAkQC&oi=fnd&pg=PA53&dq=related:Qv2gopEKF94J:scholar.google.com/&ots=MgD_Im30ad&sig=BrAmHvUfOoMcfiEDFliaoIkWU18#v=onepage&q&f=false.
- Täht, K. (2012). The cross-cultural view on students’ motivation to learn. Dissertationes Psychologicae Universitatis Tartuensis, 37. Tartu, Estonia: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar
- Veiga, F. H. (2005). What is missing for students to be good at mathematics. Psicologia Educação Cultura, 9(1), 35–53.Google Scholar