An Investigation of Pre-service Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Ability to Conduct Valid Proofs, Methods Used, and Reasons for Invalid Arguments

Article

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to investigate Turkish pre-service middle school mathematics teachers’ ability in conducting valid proofs for statements regarding numbers and algebra in terms of their year of enrollment in a teacher education program, to determine the proof methods used in their valid proofs, and to examine the reasons for their invalid arguments. A proof questionnaire containing three proof statements was administered to 115 pre-service middle school mathematics teachers in a large state university in Ankara, Turkey. The results showed that more than half of the pre-service teachers were able to conduct valid proofs for the given statements. In terms of year levels, it was seen that the seniors were the least successful group in conducting valid proofs for each statement. When pre-service teachers’ valid proofs were analyzed, it was concluded that mathematical induction and direct proof were the mostly used methods for the given statements. When pre-service teachers’ invalid arguments were analyzed, it was seen that “inserting numbers to verify the given statement” and “rewriting the givens in the statement” were the common reasons for stating invalid arguments.

Keywords

Mathematical proof Pre-service middle school mathematics teachers Proof methods 

References

  1. Alcock, L. J. & Weber, K. (2010). Undergraduates’ example use in proof construction: Purposes and effectiveness. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 3, 1–22.Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, D. (2000). A survey of mathematics undergraduates’ interaction with proof: Some implications for mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(6), 869–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida, D. (2001). Pupils’ proof potential. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(1), 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altıparmak, K. & Öziş, T. (2005). An investigation upon mathematical proof and development of mathematical reasoning. Ege Education Journal, 6(1), 25–37.Google Scholar
  5. Antonini, S. & Mariotti, A. M. (2008). Indirect proof: What is specific to this way of proving? ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 40, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atwood, P.R. (2001). Learning to construct proofs in a first course on mathematical proof (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Western Michigan University, Traverse City, MI.Google Scholar
  7. Baylis, J. (1983). Proof—the essence of mathematics, part 1. International Journal of Mathematics Education and Science Technology, 14, 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, A. W. (1976). A study of pupils’ proof-explanations in mathematical situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bieda, K. (2010). Enacting proof in middle school mathematics: Challenges and opportunities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 351–382.Google Scholar
  10. Blanton, M., Stylianou, D.A., & David, M. (2003). The nature of scaffolding in undergraduate students’ transition to mathematical proof. In N.A. Pateman, B.J. Dougherty & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th PME International Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 113–120). Honalulu, Hawaii: ERIC.Google Scholar
  11. Bleiler, S. K., Thompson, D. R. & Krajčevski, M. (2014). Providing written feedback on students’ mathematical arguments: Proof validations of prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(2), 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, S. A. (2014). On skepticism and its role in the development of proof in the classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, P. J. & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Dickerson, D.S. (2008). High school mathematics teachers’ understandings of the purposes of mathematical proof (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
  15. Fitzgerald, J. F. (1996). Proof in mathematics education. Journal of Education, 178(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
  16. Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2005). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Gibson, D. (1998). Students’ use of diagrams to develop proofs in an introductory analysis course. Students’ proof schemes. In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education, III (pp.284–307). New York, NY: AMS.Google Scholar
  18. Goetting, M. (1995). The college students’ understanding of mathematical proof (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  19. Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanna, G. & de Villiers, M. (2008). ICMI study 19: Proof and proving in mathematics education. ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 40(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  21. Harel, G. & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 7, 234–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harel, G. & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward a comprehensive perspective on proof. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 435–458). Reston, VA.Google Scholar
  23. Healy, L. & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heinze, A. & Reiss, K. (2003). Reasoning and proof: Methodological knowledge as a component of proof competence. In M.A. Mariotti (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp.1--10). Bellaria, Italy: ERME.Google Scholar
  25. Iannone, P. & Inglis, M. (2010) Self efficacy and mathematical proof: Are undergraduate students good at assessing their own proof production ability? In S. Brown, S. Larsen, K. Keene, & K. Marrongelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. North Carolina: Raleigh.Google Scholar
  26. Jahnke, H. N. (2007). Proofs and hypotheses. ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 39(1–2), 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, K. (1997). Student teachers’ conceptions of mathematical proof. Mathematics Education Review, 9, 21–32.Google Scholar
  28. Knapp, J. (2005). Learning to prove in order to prove to learn. Retrieved in May 2013 from http://mathpost.asu.edu/~sjgm/issues/2005_spring/SJGM_knapp.pdf.
  29. Knuth, E. (1999). The nature of secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  30. Ko, Y. Y. (2010). Mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof: Implications for educational research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 1109–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ko, Y. Y. & Knuth, E. (2009). Undergraduate mathematics majors’ writing performance producing proofs and counterexamples about continuous functions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krantz, S.G. (2007). The history and concept of mathematical proof. Retrieved in May 2013 from www.math.wustl.edu/~sk/eolss.pdf.
  33. Mariotti, M.A. (2006). Proof and proving in mathematics education. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education, (pp. 173–204), Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
  34. Martin, W. G. & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mejia-Ramos, J.P. & Inglis, M. (2009). Argumentative and proving activities in mathematics education research. In F.-L. Lin, F.-J. Hsieh, G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI Study 19 conference: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 88–93). [New York, NY]: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morris, D.W. & Morris, J. (2009). Proofs and concepts: The fundamentals of abstract mathematics. Alberta, Canada: University of Lethbridge.Google Scholar
  38. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standard for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  39. Overton, W. F. (1990). Reasoning, necessity, and logic: Developmental perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  40. Palla, M., Potari, D. & Spyrou, P. (2011). Secondary school students’ understanding of mathematical induction: Structural characteristics and the process of proof construction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1023–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raman, M. (2003). What are they and how can they help us understand how people view proof? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Recio, A. M. & Godino, J. D. (2001). Institutional and personal meanings of mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Riley, K.J. (2003). An investigation of prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof and refutations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.Google Scholar
  44. Ross, K. A. (1998). Doing and proving: The place of algorithms and proof in school mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly, 3, 252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saeed, R.M. (1996). An exploratory study of college students’ understanding of mathematical proof and the relationship of this understanding to their attitudes toward mathematics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio University, Athens, OH.Google Scholar
  46. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). What do we know about mathematics curricula? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13(1), 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Segal, J. (2000). Learning about mathematical proof: Conviction and validity. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shipley, A.J. (1999). An investigation of collage students’ understanding of proof construction when doing mathematical analysis proofs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of American, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  49. Stylianides, A. J. (2007). The notion of proof in the context of elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stylianides, A. J. & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: Knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stylianides, A. & Stylianides, G. (2009). Proof constructions and evaluations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stylianides, A. J., Stylianides, G. J. & Philippou, G. N. (2004). Undergraduate students’ understanding of the contraposition equivalence rule in symbolic and verbal contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 133–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stylianides, A.J., Stylianides, G.J. & Philippou, G.N. (2005). Prospective teachers’ understanding of proof: What if the truth set of an open sentence is broader than that covered by the proof? In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 4, pp. 241–248). Melbourne, Australia, PME.Google Scholar
  54. Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J. & Philippou, G. N. (2007). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of proof by mathematical induction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tall, D. (1989). The nature of mathematical proof. Mathematics Teaching, 127, 28–32.Google Scholar
  56. VanSpronsen, H.D. (2008). Proof processes of novice mathematics proof writers (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Montana, Missoula, MT.Google Scholar
  57. Velleman, D.J. (2006). How to prove it. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs. The need for strategic knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weber, K. (2008). How mathematicians determine if an argument is a valid proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 431–459.Google Scholar
  60. Weber, K. (2010). Mathematics’ majors perceptions of conviction, validity, and proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 306--336.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Middle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations