The Cognitive Process of Chinese Abacus Arithmetic
Based on the literature review about abacus arithmetic, this study proposes a model of the cognitive process of Chinese abacus arithmetic. This model describes three methods for solving abacus arithmetic problems: retrieval method, procedure method, and mental arithmetic method and three external factors that affect the choice of those methods: level of expertise, level of difficulty, and type of operation. The experiment in the study invited 36 participants including 12 vocational high-school students as junior experts, 12 ordinary high-school students as novices, and 12 bank clerks as senior experts to validate the 3 × 3 × 2 experiment. The results of this study indicate that (1) the retrieval method, procedure method, and mental arithmetic method are the three main calculation methods of abacus arithmetic, each of them having some variations; (2) experts tend to use the retrieval method, while novices tend to use the mental arithmetic method; (3) the retrieval method and mental arithmetic method are applied more for simple operations and addition problems, while the procedure method is applied more for complicated operations and subtraction problems.
KeywordsAbacus arithmetic Cognitive process Mental arithmetic method Procedure method Retrieval method
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 71188001).
- Atkinson, R. & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
- Campbell, J. I. D. (1996). Mechanisms of simple addition and multiplication: A modified network-interference theory and simulation. Mathematical Cognition, 1(1), 121–164.Google Scholar
- Campbell, J.I.D. & Oliphant, M. (1992). Representation and retrieval of arithmetic facts: A network-interference model and simulation. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.). The nature and origin of mathematical skills (pp. 331–364). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland, Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Hatano, G. (1983). Becoming an expert in mental abacus operation: A case of routine expertise. Advances in Japanese Cognitive Science, 1(1), 141–160.Google Scholar
- LeFevre, J. A., Sadesky, G. S. & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 216–230.Google Scholar
- Li, S. T. (1958). The origin of the abacus and its development. Paper presented at the ACM Annual Conference/Annual Meeting: Preprints of papers presented at the 13th national meeting of the Association for Computing Machinery, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
- Negishi, H., Ueda, K., Kriyama, M., Kato, M., Kawaguchi, H. & Atsumori, H. (2005). Change of mental representation with the expertise of mental abacus. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2005 (pp. 1606–1611). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Siegler, R. S. & Jenkins, E. A. (1989). How children discover new strategies. Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Siegler, R. S. & Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In T. Simon & G. S. Halford (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling. Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Siegler, R. S. & Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? In C. Sophian (Ed.), Origins of cognitive skills (pp. 229–293). Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Widaman, K. F., Geary, D. C., Cormier, P. & Little, T. D. (1989). A componential model for mental addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 898–919.Google Scholar