Measuring Elementary Student’s Mathematics Motivation: A Validity Study

  • Michael J. OroscoEmail author


The psychometric properties of a 10-item math motivation scale were empirically validated with an independent sample consisting of 182 elementary-school students. Analysis of the model dimensionality supported a one-factor structure fit. Item parameter estimates from a Classical Test Theory framework revealed that most items were highly discriminating, and the survey is informative for students of low to average math motivation. Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses found two items exhibiting gender bias. Overall, the instrument was a psychometrically valid instrument for measuring math motivation at the elementary level.


Elementary students Math motivation Scale development Test validity 


  1. Aiken, L. R. (1970). Attitudes toward mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 40, 551–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. R. (1972). Research on attitude toward mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 19, 229–234.Google Scholar
  3. Aiken, L. R. (1974). Two scales of attitude toward mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics in Education, 5, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aiken, L. R. (1976). Update on attitudes and other affective variables in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 46, 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderman, E. M. & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(3), 269–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderman, E. M. & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(8), 811–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Angoff, W. H. (1993). Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 3–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Ashcraft, M. H. & Moore, A. M. (2009). Mathematics anxiety and the affective drop in performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bleeker, M. M. & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in math and science: Do mothers’ beliefs matter 12 years later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boaler, J. (2008). What’s math got to do with it?: How parents and teachers can help children learn to love their least favorite subject. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Bodovski, K. & Farkas, G. (2007). Mathematics growth in early elementary school: The roles of beginning knowledge, student engagement, and instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 108(2), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brooks, G. P. & Johanson, G. A. (2003). Test analysis program. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 305–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brophy, J.E. (2013). Motivating students to learn. Abingdon, Britain:Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Chamberlin, S. A. (2010). A review of instruments created to assess affect in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 167–182.Google Scholar
  15. Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeBellis, V. A. & Goldin, G. A. (1993). Analysis of interactions between affect and cognition in elementary school children during problem solving. In J. R. Becker & B. J. Pence (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of Psychology of Mathematics Education–North America (Vol. 2, pp. 56–62). San Jose, CA: San Jose State University.Google Scholar
  17. DeBellis, V. A. & Goldin, G. A. (1997). The affective domain in mathematical problem solving. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education  (Vol. 2, pp. 209–216).Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  18. DiStefano, C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(3), 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eccles, J. S. & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. Research on Motivation in Education, 3, 139–186.Google Scholar
  20. Goldin, G. A. (2000). Affective pathways and representation in mathematical problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hannula, M. S. (2002). Attitude towards mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henningsen, M., & Stein, M.K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom- based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549.Google Scholar
  23. Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential item functioning: Theory and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Hopko, D. R., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R. L. & Hunt, M. K. (2003). The abbreviated math anxiety scale (AMAS) construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10(2), 178–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kloosterman, P. (1996). Students’ beliefs about knowing and learning mathematics: Implications for motivation. In M. Carr (Ed.), Motivation in mathematics (pp. 131–156). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
  28. Kloosterman, P., Raymond, A.M. & Emenaker, C. (1996). Students’ beliefs about mathematics: A three-year study. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 39–56.Google Scholar
  29. Leder, G. C. & Forgasz, H. J. (2002). Measuring mathematical beliefs and their impact on the learning of mathematics: a New approach.In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 95–113). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Ma, X. & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9(2), 26–47.Google Scholar
  31. Mann, A., Legewie, J. & Diprete, T. A. (2015). The role of school performance in narrowing gender gaps in the formation of stem aspirations: A cross-national study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00171.
  32. McLeod, D. B. (1989). Beliefs, attitudes, and emotions: New views of affect in mathematics education. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 245–258). New York, NY: Springer-Vela.Google Scholar
  33. McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. McLeod, D. B. (1994). Research on affect and mathematics learning in the JRME: 1970 to present. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C. & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., Askew, K., et al. (2009). Gender and Motivation. In K. R. Wentzel (Ed.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 411–432). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Meece, J. L. & Eccles, J. S. (1993). Introduction: Recent trends in research on gender and education. Educational Psychologist, 28, 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Middleton, A. J. & Spanias, A. P. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muñiz, J., Hambleton, R. K. & Xing, D. (2001). Small sample studies to detect flaws in item translations. International Journal of Testing, 1(2), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  41. National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  42. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Raven, J. C., Court, J. H. & Raven, J. (1990). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales: Coloured progressive matrices (1990 edition, with U.S. norms). Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  45. Richardson, F. C. & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(6), 551–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ruble, D.N., Martin, C.L. & Berenbaum, S.A. (1998). Gender development. Handbook of child psychology., 3.
  47. Ryan, A. M. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). “Should I ask for help?” The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Suinn, R. M., Taylor, S. & Edwards, R. W. (1988). Suinn mathematics anxiety rating scale for elementary school students (MARS-E): Psychometric and normative data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(4), 979–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turner, J.C. & Meyer, D.K. (2009). Understanding motivation in mathematics: What is happening in classrooms. In K. Wentzel, A. Wigfield, & D. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school, (pp. 527–552). Abingdon, Britain: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Urdan, T. & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 524–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Roeser, R. & Schiefele, U. (2008). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Development psychology: An advanced coursebook (pp. 406–425). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A., Freedman-Doan, K. & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1997). Changes in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A three-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wirth, R. J. & Edwards, M. C. (2007). Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 58–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wood, R. (1988). Item analysis. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 376–384). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  55. Yu, C. Y. & Muthén, B. O. (2001). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes (Technical report). Los Angeles, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  56. Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California RiversideRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations