# Measuring Elementary Student’s Mathematics Motivation: A Validity Study

Article

First Online:

## Abstract

The psychometric properties of a 10-item math motivation scale were empirically validated with an independent sample consisting of 182 elementary-school students. Analysis of the model dimensionality supported a one-factor structure fit. Item parameter estimates from a Classical Test Theory framework revealed that most items were highly discriminating, and the survey is informative for students of low to average math motivation. Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses found two items exhibiting gender bias. Overall, the instrument was a psychometrically valid instrument for measuring math motivation at the elementary level.

## Keywords

Elementary students Math motivation Scale development Test validity## References

- Aiken, L. R. (1970). Attitudes toward mathematics.
*Review of Educational Research, 40*, 551–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Aiken, L. R. (1972). Research on attitude toward mathematics.
*Arithmetic Teacher, 19*, 229–234.Google Scholar - Aiken, L. R. (1974). Two scales of attitude toward mathematics.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics in Education, 5*, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Aiken, L. R. (1976). Update on attitudes and other affective variables in learning mathematics.
*Review of Educational Research, 46*, 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Anderman, E. M. & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools.
*Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22*(3), 269–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Anderman, E. M. & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects.
*Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31*(8), 811–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Angoff, W. H. (1993). Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.),
*Differential item functioning*(pp. 3–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Ashcraft, M. H. & Moore, A. M. (2009). Mathematics anxiety and the affective drop in performance.
*Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27*(3), 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bleeker, M. M. & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in math and science: Do mothers’ beliefs matter 12 years later?
*Journal of Educational Psychology, 96*(1), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Boaler, J. (2008).
*What’s math got to do with it?: How parents and teachers can help children learn to love their least favorite subject*. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar - Bodovski, K. & Farkas, G. (2007). Mathematics growth in early elementary school: The roles of beginning knowledge, student engagement, and instruction.
*The Elementary School Journal, 108*(2), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Brooks, G. P. & Johanson, G. A. (2003). Test analysis program.
*Applied Psychological Measurement, 27*, 305–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Brophy, J.E. (2013).
*Motivating students to learn*. Abingdon, Britain:Routledge.Google Scholar - Chamberlin, S. A. (2010). A review of instruments created to assess affect in mathematics.
*Journal of Mathematics Education, 3*(1), 167–182.Google Scholar - Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.
*Structural Equation Modeling, 9*(2), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - DeBellis, V. A. & Goldin, G. A. (1993). Analysis of interactions between affect and cognition in elementary school children during problem solving. In J. R. Becker & B. J. Pence (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of Psychology of Mathematics Education–North America*(Vol. 2, pp. 56–62). San Jose, CA: San Jose State University.Google Scholar - DeBellis, V. A. & Goldin, G. A. (1997). The affective domain in mathematical problem solving. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 2, pp. 209–216).Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar - DiStefano, C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis.
*Structural Equation Modeling, 9*(3), 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Eccles, J. S. & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents.
*Research on Motivation in Education, 3*, 139–186.Google Scholar - Goldin, G. A. (2000). Affective pathways and representation in mathematical problem solving.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2*, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hannula, M. S. (2002). Attitude towards mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49*(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Henningsen, M., & Stein, M.K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom- based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*28*(5), 524–549.Google Scholar - Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (1993).
*Differential item functioning: Theory and practice*. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Hopko, D. R., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R. L. & Hunt, M. K. (2003). The abbreviated math anxiety scale (AMAS) construction, validity, and reliability.
*Assessment, 10*(2), 178–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.
*Structural Equation Modeling, 6*(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve.
*Child Development, 73*(2), 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kloosterman, P. (1996). Students’ beliefs about knowing and learning mathematics: Implications for motivation. In M. Carr (Ed.),
*Motivation in mathematics*(pp. 131–156). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar - Kloosterman, P., Raymond, A.M. & Emenaker, C. (1996). Students’ beliefs about mathematics: A three-year study.
*The Elementary School Journal*,*97*(1), 39–56.Google Scholar - Leder, G. C. & Forgasz, H. J. (2002).
*Measuring mathematical beliefs and their impact on the learning of mathematics: a New approach.In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education?*(pp. 95–113). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar - Ma, X. & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*9*(2), 26–47.Google Scholar - Mann, A., Legewie, J. & Diprete, T. A. (2015). The role of school performance in narrowing gender gaps in the formation of stem aspirations: A cross-national study.
*Frontiers in Psychology*,*6*, 171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00171. - McLeod, D. B. (1989). Beliefs, attitudes, and emotions: New views of affect in mathematics education. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.),
*Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective*(pp. 245–258). New York, NY: Springer-Vela.Google Scholar - McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.),
*Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 575–596). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar - McLeod, D. B. (1994). Research on affect and mathematics learning in the JRME: 1970 to present.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25*, 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C. & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.
*Journal of Applied Psychology, 93*(3), 568–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., Askew, K., et al. (2009). Gender and Motivation. In K. R. Wentzel (Ed.),
*Handbook of motivation at school*(pp. 411–432). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - Meece, J. L. & Eccles, J. S. (1993). Introduction: Recent trends in research on gender and education.
*Educational Psychologist, 28*, 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Middleton, A. J. & Spanias, A. P. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations and criticisms of the research.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30*(1), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Muñiz, J., Hambleton, R. K. & Xing, D. (2001). Small sample studies to detect flaws in item translations.
*International Journal of Testing, 1*(2), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2007).
*Mplus user’s guide*(5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar - National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008).
*Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel*. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.Google Scholar - Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings.
*Review of Educational Research, 66*(4), 543–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
*Journal of Educational Psychology, 82*(1), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Raven, J. C., Court, J. H. & Raven, J. (1990).
*Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales: Coloured progressive matrices (1990 edition, with U.S. norms)*. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar - Richardson, F. C. & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data.
*Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19*(6), 551–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ruble, D.N., Martin, C.L. & Berenbaum, S.A. (1998). Gender development.
*Handbook of child psychology*.,*3*. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ - Ryan, A. M. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). “Should I ask for help?” The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class.
*Journal of Educational Psychology, 89*(2), 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Suinn, R. M., Taylor, S. & Edwards, R. W. (1988). Suinn mathematics anxiety rating scale for elementary school students (MARS-E): Psychometric and normative data.
*Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48*(4), 979–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Turner, J.C. & Meyer, D.K. (2009). Understanding motivation in mathematics: What is happening in classrooms. In K. Wentzel, A. Wigfield, & D. Miele (Eds.),
*Handbook of motivation at school*, (pp. 527–552). Abingdon, Britain: Routledge.Google Scholar - Urdan, T. & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence.
*Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28*(4), 524–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Roeser, R. & Schiefele, U. (2008). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.),
*Development psychology: An advanced coursebook*(pp. 406–425). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar - Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A., Freedman-Doan, K. & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1997). Changes in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A three-year study.
*Journal of Educational Psychology, 89*, 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wirth, R. J. & Edwards, M. C. (2007). Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions.
*Psychological Methods, 12*(1), 58–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wood, R. (1988). Item analysis. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.),
*Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook*(pp. 376–384). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar - Yu, C. Y. & Muthén, B. O. (2001).
*Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes (Technical report)*. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.Google Scholar - Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use.
*Journal of Educational Psychology, 82*(1), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2015