Representational Flexibility and Problem-Solving Ability in Fraction and Decimal Number Addition: A Structural Model
The aim of this study was to propose and validate a structural model in fraction and decimal number addition, which is founded primarily on a synthesis of major theoretical approaches in the field of representations in Mathematics and also on previous research on the learning of fractions and decimals. The study was conducted among 1701 primary and secondary school students. Eight components, which all involve representational transformations, were encompassed under the construct of representational flexibility in fraction and decimal number addition. This structure reveals that, for both concepts, the representational transformation competences of recognition and conversion, and therefore representational flexibility as well, were affected by the complexity of the concepts involved and the direction of the conversion, respectively. Results also showed that two first-order factors were needed to explain the problem-solving ability in fraction and decimal number addition, indicating the differential effect of the modes of representation that is diagrammatic and verbal form on problem-solving ability irrespective of the concepts involved, as in the case of the conversions. Representational flexibility and problem-solving ability were found to be major components of students’ representational thinking of fraction and decimal number addition. The proposed framework was invariant across the primary and secondary school students. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
KeywordsDecimal number addition Fraction addition Problem-solving ability Representational flexibility Representational transformations Structural equation model
The study reported in this article was supported by a program grant from the University of Cyprus (MED19: “The role of multiple representations in mathematical learning during the transition within and between primary and secondary school”).
- Barnett-Clarke, C., Fisher, W., Marks, R. & Ross, S. (2010). Developing essential understanding of rational number: Grades 3–5. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Boulet, G. (1998). Didactical implications of children’s difficulties in learning the fraction concept. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 20(4), 19–34.Google Scholar
- Cramer, K., Post, T. & delMas, R. (2002). Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 111–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Deliyianni, E., Elia, I., Panaoura, A. & Gagatsis, A. (2007). The functioning of representations in Cyprus mathematics textbooks. In E.P. Avgerinos & A. Gagatsis (Eds.). Current Trends in Mathematics Education (pp. 155–167). Rhodes, Greece: Cyprus Mathematics Society & University of Aegean.Google Scholar
- Elia, I., Gagatsis, A. & Demetriou, A. (2007). The effects of different modes of representation on the solution of one step additive problem. Learning and Instruction, 17, 658–672.Google Scholar
- Empson, S. B., Levi, L. & Carpenter, T. P. (2011). The algebraic nature of fractions: Developing relational thinking in elementary school. In J. Cai & E. J. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization (pp. 409–428). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
- Gagatsis, A. & Shiakalli, M. (2004). Ability to translate from one representation of the concept of function to another and mathematical problem solving. Educational Psychology, 24, 645–657.Google Scholar
- Goldin, G. A. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: A unifying research perspective. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 275–285). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Lambdin, D. (2003). Benefits of teaching through problem solving. In F. Lester (Ed.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Prekindergarten-Grade 6 (pp. 3–13). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
- Lamon, S. L. (2001). Presenting and representing: From fractions to rational numbers. In A. Cuoco & F. Curcio (Eds.), The role of representations in school mathematics—2001 yearbook (pp. 146–165). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
- Lesh, R., Post, T. & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
- Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J. P. & Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student’s evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 55–176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Sowder, J. (1997). Place value as the key to teaching decimal operations. Teaching Children Mathematics, 3(8), 448–453.Google Scholar
- Steffe, L. P. & Olive, J. (2010). Children’s fractional knowledge. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Teppo, A. & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Visual representations as objects of analysis: The number line as an example. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(1), 45–58. doi: 10.1007/s11858-013-0518-2.
- Thomas, M. O. J. (2008). Developing versatility in mathematical thinking. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(2), 71–91.Google Scholar
- Verschaffel, G., Greer, B. & Torbeyns, J. (2006). Numerical thinking. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present, and future (pp. 51–82). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar