Aligning Teaching to Learning: A 3-Year Study Examining the Embedding of Language and Argumentation into Elementary Science Classrooms
- 1.5k Downloads
How can classrooms become communities of inquiry that connect intellectually challenging science content with language-based activities (opportunities to talk, listen, read, and write) especially in settings with diverse populations? This question guided a 3-year mixed-methods research study using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach in cooperation with 2 universities, area education agencies, 6 school districts, 32 elementary teachers, and over 700 students each year. The participating teachers engaged in a yearly summer institute, planned units, implemented this curriculum in the classroom, and contributed to ongoing data collection and analysis. Findings demonstrate that critical embedded language opportunities contribute to an increase in student Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) scores in science and language based on level of implementation particularly for elementary students who receive free and reduced lunch (an indicator of living at the poverty level).
KeywordsArgumentation Argument-based inquiry Elementary school science Literacy practices in science Science learning Science writing heuristic Teaching practices in science learning
This project was funded through a Math-Science Partnership grant and the National Science Foundation (ESI - 0537035). The opinions and interpretations herein are solely that of the authors.
- Agresti, A. & Finlay, B. (1997). Statistical methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Graham, M., Milanowski, A. & Miller, J. (2012). Measuring and promoting inter-rater agreement of teacher and principal performance ratings. Washington, DC: Center for Educator Compensation Reform.Google Scholar
- Greenbowe, T. & Burke, K. (2008). Instruction by using the writing heuristic. In B. Hand (Ed.), Science inquiry, argument and language: A case for the science writing heuristic. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gunel, M. (2006). Investigating the impact of teachers’ practices of inquiry and non-traditional writing on students’ academic achievement of science during longitudinal professional development program (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
- Hand, B. (Ed.). (2008). Science inquiry, argument, and language: A case for the science writing heuristic. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
- Howe, K. (2003). Closing methodological divides: Toward democratic educational research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Kulik, J. A. (2002). School mathematics and science programs benefit from instructional technology. Report No. NSF 03-301. Retrieved from Science Resources Statistics website: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf03301/.
- Levine, J. H., & Roos, T. B. (2002). Introduction to data analysis: The rules of evidence. Retrieved March 13, 2007, from http://www.dartmouth.edu/~mss/docs/Volumes_1-2.pdf
- Mertler, C. A. & Vannatta, R. A. (2002). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak.Google Scholar
- Norton-Meier, L., Hand, B., Hockenberry, L. & Wise, K. (2008). Questions, claims, & evidence: The important place of argument in children’s science writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Norton-Meier, L. A., Hand, B. & Ardasheva, Y. (2013). Examining teacher actions supportive of cross-disciplinary science and literacy development among elementary students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 1(1), 43–55.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Sheskin, D. (2004). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
- Smith, M. (2006). Multiple methodology in education research. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in educational research (pp. 457–476). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Tinsley, H.E.A. & Weiss, D.J. (2000). Interrater reliability and agreement. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 95–124). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar