Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Students’ Use of “Look Back” Strategies in Multiple Solution Methods

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between both 9th-grade and 1st-year undergraduate students’ use of “look back” strategies and problem solving performance in multiple solution methods, the difference in their use of look back strategies and problem solving performance in multiple solution methods, and the role of look back strategies in problem solving in multiple solution methods. Data for this study were comprised of 30 9th-grade and 30 1st-year undergraduate students’ problem solving scores in multiple solution methods and their think-aloud protocols. Based on and expanded from Polya’s (1973) ideas, “look back” in the present study means “examination of what was done or learned previously.” The results of this study indicated that both the 9th-grade and 1st-year undergraduate students who looked back more frequently tended to perform better in multiple solution methods, the 1st-year undergraduate students tended to look back more frequently and perform better than the 9th-grade students in multiple solution methods, and both the 9th-grade and 1st-year undergraduate students tended to review and to compare multiple solution methods in their use of look back strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biddlecomb, B. & Carr, M. (2010). A longitudinal study of the development of mathematics strategies and underlying counting schemes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

  • Cai, J. & Brook, M. (2006). Looking back in problem solving. Mathematics Teaching, 196, 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, R. I., Lester, F. & O’Daffer, P. (1987). How to evaluate progress in problem solving. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Dooren, V. W., Chen, Q. & Verschaffel, L. (2010). An investigation on Chinese teachers’ realistic problem posing and problem solving ability and beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 919–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, M. S. (2009). Approaches to the teaching of creative and non-creative mathematical problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. J. & McKillip, W. D. (1980). Improving story-problem solving in elementary school mathematics. In S. Krulik & R. E. Reys (Eds.), Problem solving in school mathematics: 1980 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 80–91). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGuire, L. J. (1980). Polya visits the classroom. In S. Krulik & R. E. Reys (Eds.), Problem solving in school mathematics: 1980 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 70–79). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouche, K. K. (1993). Problem solving and creativity: Multiple solution methods in a cross-cultural study in middle level mathematics. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.archive.org/details/problemsolvingcr00fouc. Accessed 6 Feb 2014.

  • Groβe, C. S. & Renkl, A. (2006). Effects of multiple solution methods in mathematics learning. Learning and Instruction, 16, 122–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heid, M. (1995). Algebra in a technological world (Addenda Series Grades 9–12). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Heinze, A., Star, J. R. & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Flexible and adaptive use of strategies and representations in mathematics education. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 41(5), 535–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobbe, T. (2007). Using Polya to overcome translation difficulties. Mathematics Teacher, 101(5), 390–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantowski, M. G. (1977). Processes involved in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 8(3), 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, B. (2010). Mathematics homework: A study of three grade eight classrooms in Singapore. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersh, M. & McDonald, J. (1991). How do I solve thee? Let me count the ways. Arithmetic Teacher, 39(2), 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J. (1967). Analyzing the solution of word problems in mathematics: An exploratory study. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED027182. Accessed 30 Jan 2014.

  • Krulik, S. & Rudnick, J. A. (1994). Reflect… for problem solving and reasoning. The Arithmetic Teacher, 41(6), 334–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R., Leikin, M., Waisman, I. & Shaul, S. (2013). Effect of the presence of external representations on accuracy and reaction time in solving mathematical double-choice problems by students of different levels of instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1049–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oehmke, T. (1979). The development and validation of a testing instrument to measure problem solving skills of children in grades five through eight. Doctoral dissertation: University of Lowa. http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/cgi-bin2/Libo.cgi?searchString=http%3A%2F%2Fpqdd.sinica.edu.tw%2Fcgi-bin2%2FLibo.cgi%3Frequest%3DLA_GET_HTML%26template%3Dresults_single%26user%3Dcnjppmejkooaihbondbcmcighckhpnieeodfedifjiadgkegehnkpekbklfmekbp%26client_type%3Dsearch%26lang%3Dddc.tw%26urlID%3D1418616853388%26app%3D13%26db%3D%26expr%3DCICHHEGIGFCHCAGBGOGECACHGEGFHGGFGMGPHAGNGFGOHECHCAGBGOGECACHGBGOGECHCAGBGOGECACHHGGBGMGJGEGBHEGJGPGOCHCAGBGOGECACHGPGGCHCAGBGOGECACHGBCHCAGBGOGECACHHEGFHDHEGJGOGHCHCAGBGOGECACHGJGOHDHEHCHFGNGFGOHECHCAGBGOGECACHHEGPCHCAGBGOGECACHGNGFGBHDHFHCGFCHCAGBGOGECACHHAHCGPGCGMGFGNCHCAGBGOGECACHHDGPGMHGGJGOGHCHCJ%26option%3DFLHDGPHCHEDNDBCOHEGJHEGMGFCOEJFNFLHDHJGOGPGOHJGNDNDBFN%26start%3D0%26number%3D30%26result_type%3Dsimple%26doi%3D8012402%3A8012402%26page_type%3Dhtm%26record_browse%3D1%26result_book_id%3D46150476%26ori_db%3D%26%26uID%3Dfdpahagdfoclhlmefjchflhi. Accessed 18 Dec 2013.

  • Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittle-Johnson, B. & Star, J. R. (2007). Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, H. L. & Oehmke, T. (1980). A new approach to the measurement of problem solving skills. In S. Krulik & R. E. Reys (Eds.), Problem solving in school mathematics: 1980 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 216–227). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Problem solving in the mathematics curriculum: A report, recommendations, and an annotated bibliography. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2009). Cognitive science and mathematics education: An overview. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 1–31). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A., Ghousseini, H., Gosen, D., Charalambous, C. & Strawhun, B. T. F. (2005). Moving from rhetoric to praxis: Issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowder, L. (1986). The looking-back step in problem solving. The Arithmetic Teacher, 79, 511–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachneck, H. J. M., Koedinger, K. R. & Nathan, M. J. (1994). Toward a theoretical account of strategy use and sense-making in mathematics problem solving. In A. Ram & K. Eiselt (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 836–841). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taback, S. (1988). The wonder and creativity in “looking-back” at problem solutions. The Arithmetic Teacher, 81(6), 429–435.

  • Voyer, D. (2010). Performance in mathematical problem solving as a function of comprehension and arithmetic skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1073–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahner, D. & Corter, J. E. (2010). The process of probability problem solving: Use of external visual representations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 177–204.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan

    Shin-Yi Lee

Authors
  1. Shin-Yi Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin-Yi Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, SY. Students’ Use of “Look Back” Strategies in Multiple Solution Methods. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 701–717 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9599-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9599-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation