Does Higher Education Improve Student Scientific Reasoning Skills?
- 1.4k Downloads
An ultimate goal of higher education is to prepare our future workers with needed knowledge and skills. This includes cultivating students to become proficient reasoners who can utilize proper scientific reasoning to devise causal inferences from observations. Conventionally, students with more years of higher education are expected to have a greater level of scientific reasoning. Also expected traditionally is that studying science and engineering or attending top-rated universities can better promote students’ scientific reasoning than studying other majors or attending lower ranked institutions. In this study, we used Lawson’s Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (LCTSR) with 1,637 Chinese students in different years of study, different fields, and different university tiers. It was found that regardless of which major or university students entered, their scientific reasoning measured by the LCTSR showed little variation across the entire 4 years of undergraduate education. Simply put, there was little association between tertiary-level learning and scientific reasoning. This study calls our attention to the status quo of higher education and motivates researchers across the globe to look into this issue in their own nations.
KeywordsScientific reasoning Content learning Higher education
This study is partially supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF Grant No. DRL 1252399).
- Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K. M., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., . . . Wu, N. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323(5914), 586–587.Google Scholar
- Barrow, M. (2004). Student assessment and knowing in contemporary Western societies. Proceedings of the 2004 Annual International Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA). Retrieved from http://www.herdsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/conference/2004/PDF/P001-jt.pdf
- Blunch, N. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Carmel, J. H. & Yezierski, E. J. (2013). Are we keeping the promise? Investigation of students’ critical thinking growth. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 71–81.Google Scholar
- DeHaan, R. L. (2008). National cultural influences on higher education. In R. L. DeHaan & V. Narayan (Eds.), Education for innovation: Implication for India, China and America. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
- Ding, L. (2014a). Verification of causal influences of reasoning skills and epistemology on physics conceptual learning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 023101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.023101.
- Ding, L. (2014b). Long live traditional textbook problems!? -- Constraints on faculty use of research-based problems in introductory courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 123–144. doi: 10.1007/s10763-013-9400-5.
- Dunbar, K. & Klahr, D. (2012). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 701–718). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.Google Scholar
- Fencl, H. S. (2010). Development of students’ critical-reasoning skills through content-focused activities in a general education course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(5), 56–62.Google Scholar
- Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. & Lawson, A. E. (1998). What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes? Journal of Research in Science Education, 35(1), 89–103.Google Scholar
- Kline, P. (1986). A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. New York, NY: Methuen.Google Scholar
- Koenig, K., Schen, M., Edwards, M. & Bao, L. (2012). Addressing STEM retention through a scientific thought and methods course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 23–29.Google Scholar
- Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, D. (2002). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 371–393). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Lederman, N. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–880). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Min, W. (2004). Chinese higher education: The legacy of the past and the context of the future. In P. Altbach & T. Umakoshi (Eds.), Asian universities: Historical perspectives and contemporary challenges (pp. 53–83). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education of China. (2004). Regulations on academic degrees of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (MOE-PRC).Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education of China. (2012). 2012 National Ranking of Higher Education. Beijing: Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (MOE-PRC).Google Scholar
- National Academy of Sciences. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A. & Viiri, J. (2012). Relations between representational consistency, conceptual understanding of the force concept, and scientific reasoning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010123.Google Scholar
- Popper, K. (2002). Popper—the logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Wills, K., Giamellaro, M., Lan, M.-C., Mason, H. & Sands, D. (2012). Developing and evaluating instructionally sensitive assessments in science. Journal of Research in Science Education, 49(6), 691–712.Google Scholar
- Simpson, Z., Rensburg, J. V. & Ryneveld, M. V. (2010). Student performance against levels of cognitive demand in a material science course. Paper presented at the ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
- Yu, K., Stith, A. L., Liu, L. & Chen, H. (2012). Tertiary education at a glance: China. Boston, MA: Sense.Google Scholar