Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

College Student Persistence in Scientific Disciplines: Cultural and Social Capital as Contributing Factors

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Underrepresentation of women of color in science majors and careers continues to be a concern for many science educators. Despite being the fastest growing population of college students, women of color have made insufficient gains in college science degree attainment. Sixteen women of color who were undergraduates majoring in a science field participated in three-part, in-depth interviews. Prominent factors associated with persistence as a science major included academic preparation for college science, faculty support, important school science experiences, family support, science support programs, altruistic beliefs, and the importance of religion. This study examined the data using current persistence theories as well as exploring the role of cultural and social capital as sources for support and motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85(2), 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. G. (2009). Improving the climate for undergraduate teaching and learning in STEM fields. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 117, 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, B. (2010). Religion and habitus: Exploring the relationship between religious involvement and educational outcomes and orientations among urban African American students. Urban Education, 45(4), 448–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1987). The forms of social capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.

  • Carlone, H. B. & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, H. B. & Johnson, A. (2012). Unpacking “culture” in cultural studies of science education: cultural difference versus cultural production. Ethnography and Education, 7(2), 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceglie, R. (2011). Underrepresentation of Women of Color in the Science Pipeline: The Construction of Science Identities, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17, 271-293.

  • Clewell, B. C. & Campbell, P. B. (2002). Taking stock: Where we’ve been, where we are, where we’re going. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(3), 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. & Espinoza, A. (2008). Examining the academic success of Latino students in science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Student Development, 49(4), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. S. (1999). Why science? Women scientists and their pathways along the road less traveled. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5(2), 129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M. A. & Finkel, E. (1998). Women’s science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Espinosa, L. L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 209–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gándara, P., Rumberger, R., Maxwell-Jolly, J. & Callahan, R. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11(36), 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.

  • Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York, NY: de Gruyter.

  • Gutiérrez, C. D. & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits and repertoire of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazari, Z., Tai, R. H. & Sadler, P. M. (2007). Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: The influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors. Science Education, 91(6), 847–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, S. M. & Stage, F. K. (2009). Attitudes, perceptions, and preferences of faculty at Hispanic serving and predominantly Black institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 80(3), 270–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, S. & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 324–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., Cabrera, N. L., Lin, M. H., Park, J. & Lopez, M. (2008). Training future scientists: Predicting first-year minority student participation in health science research. Research in Higher Education, 49(2), 126–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, S., Han, J. C., Sáenz, V. B., Espinosa, L. L., Cabrera, N. L. & Cerna, O. S. (2007). Predicting transition and adjustment to college: Biomedical and behavioral science aspirants’ and minority students’ first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 841–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H. A. & Cuevas, A. K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahveci, A., Southerland, S. & Gilmer, P. (2007). From marginality to legitimate peripherality: Understanding the essential functions of a women’s program. Science Education, 92(1), 33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. & Brinkman, S. (2008). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • LeCompte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E. & Burkham, D. T. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., Deaktor, R. A., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P. & Enders, C. (2005). An instructional intervention’s impact on the science and literacy achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 857–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou, D. D., Antrop-Gonzalez, R. & Cooper, R. (2009). Unveiling the promise of community cultural wealth to sustaining Latina/o students’ college going information networks. Educational Studies, 45(6), 534–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. S. (2005). Exploring high academic performance: The case of Latinos in higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4(3), 252–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (2012). The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2011. Report No. NCES 2012-465, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2012465.pd. Accessed 5 Jan 2014.

  • National Science Board (2012). Science and engineering indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01).

  • National Science Foundation (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/pdf/nsf13304_full.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2014.

  • Nora, A., Barlow, E. & Crisp, G. (2005). Student persistence and degree attainment beyond the first year in college: The need for research. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success (pp. 129–153). Westport, CT: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, O., Ault, C. R., Bentz, B. & Meskimen, L. (2001). The black-while “achievement gap” as a perennial challenge of urban science education: A sociocultural and historical overview with implications for research and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1101–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackes, M., Trundle, K. C., Bell, R. L. & O’Connell, A. A. (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children’s immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, I. (2012). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

  • Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving. Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spady, W. G. (1971). Dropouts from higher education: Toward an empirical model. Interchange, 2(3), 38–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. (1997). Organizational culture in higher education: Defining the essentials. Journal of Higher Education, 68(3), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villegas, A. M. & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J. & Mazur, E. (2013). Retaining students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. E. & Kittleson, J. (2013). Science as a classed and gendered endeavor: Persistence of two white female first-generation college students within an undergraduate science context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 802–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert John Ceglie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ceglie, R.J., Settlage, J. College Student Persistence in Scientific Disciplines: Cultural and Social Capital as Contributing Factors. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14 (Suppl 1), 169–186 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9592-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9592-3

Keywords

Navigation