Advertisement

College Student Persistence in Scientific Disciplines: Cultural and Social Capital as Contributing Factors

  • Robert John CeglieEmail author
  • John Settlage
Article

Abstract

Underrepresentation of women of color in science majors and careers continues to be a concern for many science educators. Despite being the fastest growing population of college students, women of color have made insufficient gains in college science degree attainment. Sixteen women of color who were undergraduates majoring in a science field participated in three-part, in-depth interviews. Prominent factors associated with persistence as a science major included academic preparation for college science, faculty support, important school science experiences, family support, science support programs, altruistic beliefs, and the importance of religion. This study examined the data using current persistence theories as well as exploring the role of cultural and social capital as sources for support and motivation.

Keywords

Motivation Persistence Sources of capital Underrepresentation Women of color 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85(2), 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R. G. (2009). Improving the climate for undergraduate teaching and learning in STEM fields. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 117, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, B. (2010). Religion and habitus: Exploring the relationship between religious involvement and educational outcomes and orientations among urban African American students. Urban Education, 45(4), 448–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1987). The forms of social capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  5. Carlone, H. B. & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlone, H. B. & Johnson, A. (2012). Unpacking “culture” in cultural studies of science education: cultural difference versus cultural production. Ethnography and Education, 7(2), 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ceglie, R. (2011). Underrepresentation of Women of Color in the Science Pipeline: The Construction of Science Identities, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17, 271-293.Google Scholar
  8. Clewell, B. C. & Campbell, P. B. (2002). Taking stock: Where we’ve been, where we are, where we’re going. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(3), 265–284.Google Scholar
  9. Cole, D. & Espinoza, A. (2008). Examining the academic success of Latino students in science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Student Development, 49(4), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, K. S. (1999). Why science? Women scientists and their pathways along the road less traveled. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5(2), 129–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Eisenhart, M. A. & Finkel, E. (1998). Women’s science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Espinosa, L. L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 209–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gándara, P., Rumberger, R., Maxwell-Jolly, J. & Callahan, R. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11(36), 1–54.Google Scholar
  15. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York, NY: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  17. Gutiérrez, C. D. & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits and repertoire of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hazari, Z., Tai, R. H. & Sadler, P. M. (2007). Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: The influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors. Science Education, 91(6), 847–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hubbard, S. M. & Stage, F. K. (2009). Attitudes, perceptions, and preferences of faculty at Hispanic serving and predominantly Black institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 80(3), 270–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hurtado, S. & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., Cabrera, N. L., Lin, M. H., Park, J. & Lopez, M. (2008). Training future scientists: Predicting first-year minority student participation in health science research. Research in Higher Education, 49(2), 126–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurtado, S., Han, J. C., Sáenz, V. B., Espinosa, L. L., Cabrera, N. L. & Cerna, O. S. (2007). Predicting transition and adjustment to college: Biomedical and behavioral science aspirants’ and minority students’ first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 841–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H. A. & Cuevas, A. K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahveci, A., Southerland, S. & Gilmer, P. (2007). From marginality to legitimate peripherality: Understanding the essential functions of a women’s program. Science Education, 92(1), 33–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kvale, S. & Brinkman, S. (2008). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. LeCompte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 146–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, V. E. & Burkham, D. T. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  28. Lee, O., Deaktor, R. A., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P. & Enders, C. (2005). An instructional intervention’s impact on the science and literacy achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 857–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.Google Scholar
  30. Liou, D. D., Antrop-Gonzalez, R. & Cooper, R. (2009). Unveiling the promise of community cultural wealth to sustaining Latina/o students’ college going information networks. Educational Studies, 45(6), 534–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, L. S. (2005). Exploring high academic performance: The case of Latinos in higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4(3), 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. National Center for Education Statistics (2012). The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2011. Report No. NCES 2012-465, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2012465.pd. Accessed 5 Jan 2014.
  34. National Science Board (2012). Science and engineering indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01).Google Scholar
  35. National Science Foundation (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/pdf/nsf13304_full.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2014.
  36. Nora, A., Barlow, E. & Crisp, G. (2005). Student persistence and degree attainment beyond the first year in college: The need for research. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success (pp. 129–153). Westport, CT: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  37. Norman, O., Ault, C. R., Bentz, B. & Meskimen, L. (2001). The black-while “achievement gap” as a perennial challenge of urban science education: A sociocultural and historical overview with implications for research and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1101–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sackes, M., Trundle, K. C., Bell, R. L. & O’Connell, A. A. (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children’s immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seidman, I. (2012). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  40. Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving. Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  41. Spady, W. G. (1971). Dropouts from higher education: Toward an empirical model. Interchange, 2(3), 38–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tierney, W. G. (1997). Organizational culture in higher education: Defining the essentials. Journal of Higher Education, 68(3), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Villegas, A. M. & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Watkins, J. & Mazur, E. (2013). Retaining students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36–41.Google Scholar
  46. Wilson, R. E. & Kittleson, J. (2013). Science as a classed and gendered endeavor: Persistence of two white female first-generation college students within an undergraduate science context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 802–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queens University of CharlotteCharlotteUSA
  2. 2.University of ConnecticutAvery Point GrotonUSA

Personalised recommendations