Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop and validate Science Homework Scale (SHS) which assesses middle-school (grades 6–8) students’ perceptions of teachers’ homework practices and homework self-regulation in science. Students’ perceptions of teachers’ homework practices included homework quality and feedback on homework while students’ homework self-regulation consisted of homework goal orientations (i.e. mastery, performance, and work-avoidance), homework strategy use (i.e. deep learning and management), and homework procrastination; 3 studies were conducted with 7th-grade Turkish students. In study 1 (n = 618), the data were analyzed through exploratory factor analyses. In study 2 (n = 758), in order to test the hypothesized factor structure, the data were subjected to confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs). Goodness-of-fit indices indicated good model fit and Cronbach alpha reliabilities of subscales ranged from 0.77 to 0.96. Additionally, multi-group CFAs supported factorial invariance of SHS across boys and girls. In the 3rd study (n = 8318), CFA results supported 8-factor structure. Next, a homework model which suggested relationships among students’ perceptions of teachers’ homework practices, homework self-regulation, and achievement was proposed. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses results revealed that students’ perceptions of homework quality and feedback on homework were associated with homework self-regulation components which in turn related to science achievement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255.
Cooper, H. (2007). The battle over homework: Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Cooper, H. & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 143–153.
Cooper, H., Robinson, J. G. & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1–62.
Corno, L. (2000). Looking at homework differently. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 529–548.
Cushman, K. (2010). Show us what homework’s for. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 74–78.
Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Kunter, M. & Baumert, J. (2010). Homework works if homework quality is high: Using multilevel modeling to predict the development of achievement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 467–482.
Dignath, C. & Buttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264.
Enghag, M., Forsman, J., Linder, C., MacKinnon, A. & Moons, E. (2013). Using a disciplinary discourse lens to explore how representations afford meaning making in a typical wave physics course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 625–650.
Epstein, J. L. & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 181–193.
Ferrari, J. R., Mason, C. P. & Hammer, C. (2006). Procrastination as predictor of task perceptions: Examining delayed and non-delayed tasks across varied deadlines. Individual Differences Research, 4(1), 28–36.
Ferrari, J. R. & Scher, S. T. (2000). Toward an understanding of academic and nonacademic tasks procrastinated by students: The use of daily logs. Psychology in the Schools, 37(4), 359–366.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.
Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F. & Spielberger, C. D. (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Kaplan, A. & Maehr, M. (1999). Achievement goals and student wellbeing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 330–358.
Kumar, S. & Jagacinski, C. M. (2011). Confronting task difficulty in ego involvement: Change in performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 664–682.
Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C. & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523.
Meece, J. L. & Miller, S. D. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of elementary school students’ achievement goals in literacy activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 454–480.
Milgram, N., Marshevsky, S. & Sadeh, C. (1994). Correlates of academic procrastination: Discomfort, task aversiveness, and task capability. The Journal of Psychology, 129(2), 145–155.
Moore, R. (2008). Academic procrastination and course performance among developmental education students. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, 24(2), 56–67.
Ministry of National Education (2006). Ilkogretim Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi (6, 7 ve 8. Siniflar) Ogretim Programi, Ankara. [Elementary School Science and Technology Course (grade 6, 7, and 8) Curriculum, Ankara].
Nicol, D. J. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. & Mckeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L. & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96–116.
Ramdass, D. & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 194–218.
Reynolds, A. J. & Walberg, H. J. (1992). A structural model of science achievement and attitude: An extension to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 371–382.
Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Seifert, T. L. & O’Keefe, B. A. (2001). The relationship of work avoidance and learning goals to perceived competence, externality and meaning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 81–92.
Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 71–81.
Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.
Tas, Y. (2013). An investigation of students’ homework self-regulation and teachers’ homework practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Trautwein, U. & Koller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement-still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 115–145.
Trautwein, U. & Ludtke, O. (2009). Predicting homework motivation and homework effort in six school subjects: The role of person and family characteristics, classroom factors, and school track. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 243–258.
Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Schnyder, I. & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 438–456.
Trautwein, U., Niggli, A., Schnyder, I. & Ludtke, O. (2009). Between-teacher differences in homework assignments and the development of students’ homework effort, homework emotions, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 176–189.
Trautwein, U., Koller, O., Schmitz, B. & Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 26–50.
Turner, J. C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children’s motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 410–441.
Uzun Ozer, B., Demir, A. & Ferrari, J. R. (2009a). Exploring academic procrastination among Turkish students: Possible gender differences in prevalence and reasons. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(2), 241–257.
Uzun Ozer, B., Sackes, M. & Tuckman, W. B. (2009, August). Psychometric Properties of the Tuckman Procrastination Scale in a Turkish Sample. Paper presented at the 6th Biannual Conference on Procrastination, Toronto, Canada.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 179–187.
Xu, J. (2006). Gender and homework management reported by high school students. Educational Psychology, 26(1), 73–91.
Xu, J. (2008a). Models of secondary school students’ interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1180–1205.
Xu, J. (2008b). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 109(1), 82–95.
Xu, J. (2009a). Homework management reported by secondary school students. In R. Deslandes (Ed.), International perspectives on student outcomes and homework: Family-school-community partnership (pp. 110–127). New York, NY: Routledge.
Xu, J. (2009b). School location, student achievement, and homework management reported by middle school students. The School Community Journal, 19, 27–43.
Xu, J. & Corno, L. (2003). Family help and homework management reported by middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(5), 503–517.
Xu, J. & Wu, H. (2013). Self-regulation of homework behavior: Homework management at the secondary school level. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(1), 1–13.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2005). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tas, Y., Sungur, S. & Oztekin, C. DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF SCIENCE HOMEWORK SCALE FOR MIDDLE-SCHOOL STUDENTS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 417–444 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9582-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9582-5