Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF SCIENCE HOMEWORK SCALE FOR MIDDLE-SCHOOL STUDENTS

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and validate Science Homework Scale (SHS) which assesses middle-school (grades 6–8) students’ perceptions of teachers’ homework practices and homework self-regulation in science. Students’ perceptions of teachers’ homework practices included homework quality and feedback on homework while students’ homework self-regulation consisted of homework goal orientations (i.e. mastery, performance, and work-avoidance), homework strategy use (i.e. deep learning and management), and homework procrastination; 3 studies were conducted with 7th-grade Turkish students. In study 1 (n = 618), the data were analyzed through exploratory factor analyses. In study 2 (n = 758), in order to test the hypothesized factor structure, the data were subjected to confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs). Goodness-of-fit indices indicated good model fit and Cronbach alpha reliabilities of subscales ranged from 0.77 to 0.96. Additionally, multi-group CFAs supported factorial invariance of SHS across boys and girls. In the 3rd study (n = 8318), CFA results supported 8-factor structure. Next, a homework model which suggested relationships among students’ perceptions of teachers’ homework practices, homework self-regulation, and achievement was proposed. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses results revealed that students’ perceptions of homework quality and feedback on homework were associated with homework self-regulation components which in turn related to science achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255.

  • Cooper, H. (2007). The battle over homework: Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 143–153.

  • Cooper, H., Robinson, J. G. & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L. (2000). Looking at homework differently. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 529–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, K. (2010). Show us what homework’s for. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 74–78.

  • Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Kunter, M. & Baumert, J. (2010). Homework works if homework quality is high: Using multilevel modeling to predict the development of achievement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dignath, C. & Buttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enghag, M., Forsman, J., Linder, C., MacKinnon, A. & Moons, E. (2013). Using a disciplinary discourse lens to explore how representations afford meaning making in a typical wave physics course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 625–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L. & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, J. R., Mason, C. P. & Hammer, C. (2006). Procrastination as predictor of task perceptions: Examining delayed and non-delayed tasks across varied deadlines. Individual Differences Research, 4(1), 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, J. R. & Scher, S. T. (2000). Toward an understanding of academic and nonacademic tasks procrastinated by students: The use of daily logs. Psychology in the Schools, 37(4), 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F. & Spielberger, C. D. (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. & Maehr, M. (1999). Achievement goals and student wellbeing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 330–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. & Jagacinski, C. M. (2011). Confronting task difficulty in ego involvement: Change in performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 664–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C. & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L. & Miller, S. D. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of elementary school students’ achievement goals in literacy activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 454–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, N., Marshevsky, S. & Sadeh, C. (1994). Correlates of academic procrastination: Discomfort, task aversiveness, and task capability. The Journal of Psychology, 129(2), 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (2008). Academic procrastination and course performance among developmental education students. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, 24(2), 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education (2006). Ilkogretim Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi (6, 7 ve 8. Siniflar) Ogretim Programi, Ankara. [Elementary School Science and Technology Course (grade 6, 7, and 8) Curriculum, Ankara].

  • Nicol, D. J. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. & Mckeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L. & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramdass, D. & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 194–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A. J. & Walberg, H. J. (1992). A structural model of science achievement and attitude: An extension to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, T. L. & O’Keefe, B. A. (2001). The relationship of work avoidance and learning goals to perceived competence, externality and meaning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tas, Y. (2013). An investigation of students’ homework self-regulation and teachers’ homework practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

  • Trautwein, U. & Koller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement-still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 115–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U. & Ludtke, O. (2009). Predicting homework motivation and homework effort in six school subjects: The role of person and family characteristics, classroom factors, and school track. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Schnyder, I. & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 438–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U., Niggli, A., Schnyder, I. & Ludtke, O. (2009). Between-teacher differences in homework assignments and the development of students’ homework effort, homework emotions, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U., Koller, O., Schmitz, B. & Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 26–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children’s motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 410–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun Ozer, B., Demir, A. & Ferrari, J. R. (2009a). Exploring academic procrastination among Turkish students: Possible gender differences in prevalence and reasons. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(2), 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun Ozer, B., Sackes, M. & Tuckman, W. B. (2009, August). Psychometric Properties of the Tuckman Procrastination Scale in a Turkish Sample. Paper presented at the 6th Biannual Conference on Procrastination, Toronto, Canada.

  • Wolters, C. A. (2003). Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. (2006). Gender and homework management reported by high school students. Educational Psychology, 26(1), 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. (2008a). Models of secondary school students’ interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1180–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. (2008b). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 109(1), 82–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. (2009a). Homework management reported by secondary school students. In R. Deslandes (Ed.), International perspectives on student outcomes and homework: Family-school-community partnership (pp. 110–127). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. (2009b). School location, student achievement, and homework management reported by middle school students. The School Community Journal, 19, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. & Corno, L. (2003). Family help and homework management reported by middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(5), 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. & Wu, H. (2013). Self-regulation of homework behavior: Homework management at the secondary school level. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2005). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasemin Tas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tas, Y., Sungur, S. & Oztekin, C. DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF SCIENCE HOMEWORK SCALE FOR MIDDLE-SCHOOL STUDENTS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 417–444 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9582-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9582-5

Keywords

Navigation