• Yasemin TasEmail author
  • Semra Sungur
  • Ceren Oztekin


The aim of this study was to develop and validate Science Homework Scale (SHS) which assesses middle-school (grades 6–8) students’ perceptions of teachers’ homework practices and homework self-regulation in science. Students’ perceptions of teachers’ homework practices included homework quality and feedback on homework while students’ homework self-regulation consisted of homework goal orientations (i.e. mastery, performance, and work-avoidance), homework strategy use (i.e. deep learning and management), and homework procrastination; 3 studies were conducted with 7th-grade Turkish students. In study 1 (n = 618), the data were analyzed through exploratory factor analyses. In study 2 (n = 758), in order to test the hypothesized factor structure, the data were subjected to confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs). Goodness-of-fit indices indicated good model fit and Cronbach alpha reliabilities of subscales ranged from 0.77 to 0.96. Additionally, multi-group CFAs supported factorial invariance of SHS across boys and girls. In the 3rd study (n = 8318), CFA results supported 8-factor structure. Next, a homework model which suggested relationships among students’ perceptions of teachers’ homework practices, homework self-regulation, and achievement was proposed. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses results revealed that students’ perceptions of homework quality and feedback on homework were associated with homework self-regulation components which in turn related to science achievement.


feedback on homework homework quality homework self-regulation middle school science 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, H. (2007). The battle over homework: Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper, H. & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 143–153.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. G. & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corno, L. (2000). Looking at homework differently. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cushman, K. (2010). Show us what homework’s for. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 74–78.Google Scholar
  8. Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Kunter, M. & Baumert, J. (2010). Homework works if homework quality is high: Using multilevel modeling to predict the development of achievement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dignath, C. & Buttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Enghag, M., Forsman, J., Linder, C., MacKinnon, A. & Moons, E. (2013). Using a disciplinary discourse lens to explore how representations afford meaning making in a typical wave physics course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 625–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epstein, J. L. & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferrari, J. R., Mason, C. P. & Hammer, C. (2006). Procrastination as predictor of task perceptions: Examining delayed and non-delayed tasks across varied deadlines. Individual Differences Research, 4(1), 28–36.Google Scholar
  13. Ferrari, J. R. & Scher, S. T. (2000). Toward an understanding of academic and nonacademic tasks procrastinated by students: The use of daily logs. Psychology in the Schools, 37(4), 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.Google Scholar
  16. Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F. & Spielberger, C. D. (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaplan, A. & Maehr, M. (1999). Achievement goals and student wellbeing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 330–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar, S. & Jagacinski, C. M. (2011). Confronting task difficulty in ego involvement: Change in performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 664–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C. & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meece, J. L. & Miller, S. D. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of elementary school students’ achievement goals in literacy activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 454–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milgram, N., Marshevsky, S. & Sadeh, C. (1994). Correlates of academic procrastination: Discomfort, task aversiveness, and task capability. The Journal of Psychology, 129(2), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moore, R. (2008). Academic procrastination and course performance among developmental education students. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, 24(2), 56–67.Google Scholar
  24. Ministry of National Education (2006). Ilkogretim Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi (6, 7 ve 8. Siniflar) Ogretim Programi, Ankara. [Elementary School Science and Technology Course (grade 6, 7, and 8) Curriculum, Ankara].Google Scholar
  25. Nicol, D. J. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. & Mckeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.Google Scholar
  31. Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L. & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramdass, D. & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 194–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reynolds, A. J. & Walberg, H. J. (1992). A structural model of science achievement and attitude: An extension to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Seifert, T. L. & O’Keefe, B. A. (2001). The relationship of work avoidance and learning goals to perceived competence, externality and meaning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tas, Y. (2013). An investigation of students’ homework self-regulation and teachers’ homework practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
  39. Trautwein, U. & Koller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement-still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 115–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trautwein, U. & Ludtke, O. (2009). Predicting homework motivation and homework effort in six school subjects: The role of person and family characteristics, classroom factors, and school track. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Schnyder, I. & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 438–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trautwein, U., Niggli, A., Schnyder, I. & Ludtke, O. (2009). Between-teacher differences in homework assignments and the development of students’ homework effort, homework emotions, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 176–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Trautwein, U., Koller, O., Schmitz, B. & Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 26–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Turner, J. C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children’s motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 410–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Uzun Ozer, B., Demir, A. & Ferrari, J. R. (2009a). Exploring academic procrastination among Turkish students: Possible gender differences in prevalence and reasons. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(2), 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Uzun Ozer, B., Sackes, M. & Tuckman, W. B. (2009, August). Psychometric Properties of the Tuckman Procrastination Scale in a Turkish Sample. Paper presented at the 6th Biannual Conference on Procrastination, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  47. Wolters, C. A. (2003). Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xu, J. (2006). Gender and homework management reported by high school students. Educational Psychology, 26(1), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xu, J. (2008a). Models of secondary school students’ interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1180–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xu, J. (2008b). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 109(1), 82–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xu, J. (2009a). Homework management reported by secondary school students. In R. Deslandes (Ed.), International perspectives on student outcomes and homework: Family-school-community partnership (pp. 110–127). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Xu, J. (2009b). School location, student achievement, and homework management reported by middle school students. The School Community Journal, 19, 27–43.Google Scholar
  53. Xu, J. & Corno, L. (2003). Family help and homework management reported by middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(5), 503–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xu, J. & Wu, H. (2013). Self-regulation of homework behavior: Homework management at the secondary school level. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zimmerman, B. J. (2005). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kazim Karabekir Faculty of Education, Department of Elementary EducationAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Education, Department of Elementary EducationMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations