Advertisement

ARE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTIONS DEPENDENT ON RESEARCHERS’ METHODOLOGY AND DEFINITION?: A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES RELATED TO CONCEPTS OF HEAT

  • Chee Leong WongEmail author
  • Hye-Eun Chu
  • Kueh Chin Yap
Article

Abstract

Currently, there is no agreement among scientists and science educators on whether heat should be defined as a “process of energy transfer” or “form of energy.” For example, students may conceive of heat as “molecular kinetic energy,” but the interpretation of this alternative conception is dependent on educational researchers’ methodology and definition of heat. The objective of this paper is to review the alternative conceptions of heat as presented in empirical studies and to examine the possible sources of this subjectivity or causes of this problem. This paper analyzes the alternative conceptions of heat based on five categories: “residing in object,” “ontological category,” “movement,” “cause and effect,” and “condition.” The findings suggest that it could be difficult to understand the alternative conceptions when there is disagreement on the definition or description of heat. Furthermore, alternative conceptions may be traceable to linguistic usage or definitions in textbooks. Therefore, it is possible to have a misinterpretation of students’ alternative conceptions.

Key words

alternative conception definition heat methodology textbook 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

References marked with “*” are the empirical studies used in this study.

  1. *Albert, E. (1978). Development of the concept of heat in children. Science Education, 62(3), 389–399.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, M. & Millar, R. (1994). Children’s and lay adults’ views about thermal equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 405–419.Google Scholar
  3. Baierlein, R. (1994). Entropy and the second law: A pedagogical alternative. American Journal of Physics, 62(1), 15–26.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, R. P. (1992). Physics that textbook writers usually get wrong: II heat and energy. The Physics Teacher, 30(9), 353–356.Google Scholar
  5. Brewe, E. (2011). Energy as a substancelike quantity that flows: Theoretical considerations and pedagogical consequences. Physical Review, Special Topics, Physics Education Research, 7(2), 020106-1–020106-14.Google Scholar
  6. Brookes, D., Horton, G., Heuvelen, A. V. & Etkina, E. (2005). Concerning scientific discourse about heat. 2004 physics education research conference. AIP Conference Proceedings, 790, 149–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canagaratna, S. G. (1969). Critique of the definitions of heat. American Journal of Physics, 37(7), 679–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlton, K. (2000). Teaching about heat and temperature. Physics Education, 35(5), 101–5.Google Scholar
  9. Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chi, M. T. H. & Slotta, J. D. (1993). The ontological coherence of intuitive physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2 & 3), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D. & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiou, G.-L. & Anderson, O. R. (2009). A study of undergraduate physics students’ understanding of heat conduction based on mental model theory and an ontology–process analysis. Science Education, 94(5), 825–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. *Chiou, G.-L. & Anderson, O. R. (2010). A multi-dimensional cognitive analysis of undergraduate physics students’ understanding of heat conduction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(16), 2113–2142.Google Scholar
  14. Chu, H.-E., Treagust, D. F., Yeo, S. & Zadnik, M. (2012). Evaluation of students’ understanding of thermal concepts in everyday contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1509–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. *Clough, E. E. & Driver, R. (1985). Secondary Students’ conceptions of the conduction of heat: bringing together scientific and personal views. Physics Education, 20(4), 176–182.Google Scholar
  16. de Berg, K. C. (2008). The concepts of heat and temperature: The problem of determining the content for the construction of an historical case study which is sensitive to nature of science issues and teaching–learning issues. Science & Education, 17(1), 75–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doige, C. A. & Day, T. (2012). A typology of undergraduate textbook definitions of ‘heat’ across science disciplines. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 677–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duit, R. (1987). Should energy be illustrated as something quasi-material? International Journal of Science Education, 9(2), 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. *Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children’s conceptions of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63(2), 221–230.Google Scholar
  20. Erickson, G. L. (1980). Children’s viewpoints of heat: A second look. Science Education, 64(3), 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Farrow, S. (1996). The really useful science book. A framework of knowledge for primary teachers. London, England: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  22. Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B. & Sands, M. L. (1963). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol I. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  23. Galili, I. & Lehavi, Y. (2006). Definitions of physical concepts: A study of physics teachers’ knowledge and views. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 521–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. *Georgiou, H. & Sharma, M. D. (2012). University students’ understanding of thermal physics in everyday contexts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1119–1142.Google Scholar
  25. *Harrison, A. G., Grayson, D. J. & Treagust, D. F. (1999). Investigating a grade 11 student’s evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 55–87.Google Scholar
  26. *Hewson, M. G. & Hamlyn, D. (1984). The influence of intellectual environment on conceptions of heat. European Journal of Science Education, 6(4), 254–262.Google Scholar
  27. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (1997). Compendium of chemical terminology (2nd ed.). Compiled by A. D. McNaught & A. Wilkinson. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  28. *Kesidou, S. & Duit, R. (1993). Students’ conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics – an interpretive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 85–106.Google Scholar
  29. *Laburu, C. E. & Niaz, M. (2002). A lakatosian framework to analyze situations of cognitive conflict and controversy in students’ understanding of heat energy and temperature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(3), 211–219.Google Scholar
  30. Leff, H. S. (1995). Entropy and heat along reversible paths for fluids and magnets. American Journal of Physics, 63(9), 814–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. *Leinonen, R., Räsänen, E., Asikainen, M. & Hirvonen, P. E. (2009). Students’ pre-knowledge as a guideline in the teaching of introductory thermal physics at university. European Journal of Physics, 30(3), 593–604.Google Scholar
  32. Leite, L. (1999). Heat and temperature: An analysis of how these concepts are dealt with in textbooks. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. *Lewis, E. L. & Linn, M. C. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 657–677.Google Scholar
  34. Lin, S. W. (2004). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test for high school students’ understanding of flowering plant growth and development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. *Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H. & Heron, P. R. L. (2002). Student understanding of the first law of thermodynamics: relating work to the adiabatic compression of an ideal gas. American Journal of Physics, 70(2), 137–148.Google Scholar
  36. *Meltzer, D. E. (2004). Investigation of students’ reasoning regarding heat, work, and the first law of thermodynamics in an introductory calculus-based general physics course. American Journal of Physics, 72(11), 1432–1453.Google Scholar
  37. *Paik, S.-H., Cho, B.-K. & Go, Y.-M. (2007). Korean 4- to 11-year-old student conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 284–302.Google Scholar
  38. *Pathare, S. R. & Pradhan, H. C. (2010). Students’ misconceptions about heat transfer mechanisms and elementary kinetic theory. Physics Education, 45(5), 629–634.Google Scholar
  39. Piaget, J. (1972). Physical world of the child. Physics Today, 25(6), 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pushkin, B. D. (1997). Scientific terminology and context: How broad or narrow are our meanings? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 661–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Romer, R. H. (2001). Heat is not a noun. American Journal of Physics, 69(2), 107–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scherr, R. E., Close, H. G., McKagan, S. B. & Vokos, S. (2012). Representing energy. I. Representing a substance ontology for energy. Physical Review, Special Topics, Physics Education Research, 8, 020114.Google Scholar
  43. Serway, R. A. & Beichner, R. J. (2000). Physics for scientists and engineers (5th ed.). Vol. 1, Orlando, FL: Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Serway, R. A. & Faughn, J. S. (2003). College physics (6th ed.). Pacific Groove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  45. Shaw, R. E. M. (1969). A question of heat. Physics Education, 4(4), 251–252.Google Scholar
  46. *Shayer, M. & Wylam, H. (1981). The development of the concepts of heat and temperature in 10–13 year olds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(5), 419–434.Google Scholar
  47. Slisko, J. & Dykstra, D. I. (1997). The role of scientific terminology in research and teaching: Is something important missing? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 655–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. *Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H. & Joram, E. (1995). Assessing Students’ misclassifications of physics concepts: an ontological basis for conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 373–400.Google Scholar
  49. Spalding, D. B. & Cole, E. H. (1966). Engineering thermodynamics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  50. Stuart, M. C. (1938). Use and meaning of the term heat. American Journal of Physics, 6(2), 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taber, K. S. (2005). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education, 89(1), 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taber, K. S. (2013). A common core to chemical conceptions: Learners’ conceptions of chemical stability, change and bonding. In G. Tsaparlis & H. Sevian (Eds.), Concepts of matter in science education (pp. 391–418). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S. & Treagust, D.F. (2002). Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 283–301.Google Scholar
  54. *Thomaz, M. F., Malaquias, I. M., Valente, M. C. & Antunes, M. J. (1995). An attempt to overcome alternative conceptions related to heat and temperature. Physics Education, 30(1), 19–26.Google Scholar
  55. Treagust, D. & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tripp, T. B. (1976). The definition of heat. Journal of Chemistry Education, 53(12), 782–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Warren, J. W. (1982). The nature of energy. European Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 295–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. *Wiser, M. & Amin, T. (2001). “Is heat hot?” inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermal phenomena. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 331–355.Google Scholar
  59. Wong, C. L., Chu, H. E. & Yap, K. C. (2014). Developing a framework for analyzing definitions: A study of The Feynman Lectures. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2481–2513.Google Scholar
  60. *Yeo, S. & Zadnik, M. (2001). Introductory thermal concept evaluation: assessing students’ understanding. The Physics Teacher, 39(8), 496–504.Google Scholar
  61. Zemansky, M. W. (1970). The use and misuse of the word “heat” in physics teaching. The Physics Teacher, 8(6), 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zemansky, M. W. & Dittman, R. H. (1981). Heat and thermodynamics: An intermediate textbook (6th ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations