Advertisement

USING SCIENCE CAMPS TO DEVELOP UNDERSTANDINGS ABOUT SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY—TAIWANESE STUDENTS IN A U.S. SUMMER SCIENCE CAMP

  • Allison Antink-Meyer
  • Stephen BartosEmail author
  • Judith S. Lederman
  • Norman G. Lederman
Article

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a dramatic rise in the number of middle and high school students from Asian countries participating in U.S.-based summer experiences (Perlez & Gao, 2013). Although summer science camps have been shown to improve students’ attitudes and interests related to science and science learning (Bhattacharyya, Mead & Nathaniel, School Science and Mathematics 111:345–353, 2011; Fields, International Journal of Science Education 31:151–171, 2009; Gibson & Chase, Science Education 86:693–705, 2002; Luehmann, International Journal of Science Education 31:1831–1855, 2009), whether there are cognitive gains for visiting students in these short-term experiences is not well understood (Liu & Lederman, School Science and Mathematics 102:114–123, 2002; Williams, Ma, Prejean, Ford & Lai, Journal of Research on Technology in Education 40:201–216, 2007). This study explored the efficacy of a U.S. summer science camp to engender improved understandings about scientific inquiry (SI) among a group of gifted Taiwanese students (n = 19) in grades 8 and 9. Participants were completing an 80-h summer science camp at a Midwestern U.S. university. The Views About Scientific Inquiry (VASI) questionnaire (Lederman, Lederman, Bartos, Bartels, Antink Meyer & Schwartz, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51:65–83, 2014) was used to capture students’ views before and after camp participation, with modest gains evident for five of the eight aspects of scientific inquiry assessed. These gains were related to scientific investigations beginning with a question, the multiple methods of science, the role of the question in guiding procedures, the distinction between data and evidence, and the combination of data and what is already known in the development of explanations. Implications for the structure of science camps for supporting the development of SI understandings among students from Asian classrooms, and in general, are discussed.

Key words

middle grades science scientific inquiry nature of science science camps science learning views about scientific inquiry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A.,...Tuan, H-L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419.Google Scholar
  2. Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1990). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Barab, S. A. & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 70–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A. & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattacharyya, S., Mead, T. P. & Nathaniel, R. (2011). The influence of science summer camp on African‐American high school students’ career choices. School Science and Mathematics, 111(7), 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bischoff, P. J., Castendyk, D., Gallagher, H., Schaumloffel, J. & Labroo, S. (2008). A science summer camp as an effective way to recruit high school students to major in the physical sciences and science education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(3), 131–141.Google Scholar
  11. Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Bybee, R. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20–46). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  13. Capps, D. K. & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang, C. Y. & Mao, S. L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students’ outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 340–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunbar, K. (2001). What scientific thinking reveals about the nature of cognition. In K. Crowley, C. Shunn & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday classroom and professional settings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Associations, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Fields, D. A. (2009). What do students gain from a week at science camp? Youth perceptions and the design of an immersive, research-oriented astronomy camp. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). The use and impact of explicit instruction about the nature of science and science inquiry in an elementary science methods course. Science & Education, 11(1), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibson, H. L. & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry‐based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Institute of International Education (2013). Top 25 places of origin of international students, 2011/12-2012/13. Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange. Retrieved from http://www.iie.org/opendoors.
  20. Khishfe, R. & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry‐oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kong, X., Dabney, K. P. & Tai, R. H. (2014). The association between science summer camps and career interest in science and engineering. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(1), 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. A., Antink Meyer, A. & Schwartz, R. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry—The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83.Google Scholar
  25. Lederman, N. G. & Lederman, J.S. (2004). Project ICAN: A professional development project to promote teachers’ and students’ knowledge of nature of science and scientific enquiry. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual SAARMSTE Conference. Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
  26. Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S. & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138–147.Google Scholar
  27. Lee, M. K. & Erdogan, I. (2007). The effect of science–technology–society teaching on students’ attitudes toward science and certain aspects of creativity. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1315–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lester, F., Garofalo, I. & Kroll, D. (1989). Self-confidence, interest, beliefs and metacognition: Key influences on problem solving behavior. In D. McLeod & V. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Luehmann, A. L. (2009). Students’ perspectives of a science enrichment programme: Out‐of‐school inquiry as access. International Journal of Science Education, 31(13), 1831–1855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu, S. Y. & Lederman, N. G. (2002). Taiwanese gifted students’ views of nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 102(3), 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McComas, W. F. (2014). Nature of Science in the Science Curriculum and in Teacher Education Programs in the United States. In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 1993–2023). Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  32. National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  33. National Research Council [NRC]. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  34. National Research Council [NRC]. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  35. National Research Council (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  36. NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  37. Perlez, J. & Gao, H. (2013). Seeking edge in academics, Chinese spend summer in U.S. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/30/world/asia/well-off-chinese-students-summer-in-us-seeking-an-edge.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0. Accessed 29 August 2013.
  38. Rath, A. & Brown, D. E. (1996). Modes of engagement in science inquiry: A microanalysis of elementary students’ orientations toward phenomena at a summer science camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1083–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schwartz, R.S. (2004). Epistemological views in authentic science practices: a cross-discipline comparison of scientists’ views of nature of science and scientific inquiry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
  40. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G. & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwartz, R.S., Lederman, N., Khishfe, R., Lederman, J.S., Matthews, L. & Liu, S. (2002). Explicit/reflective instructional attention to nature of science and scientific inquiry: Impact on student learning. Paper presented at the 2002 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. Charlotte, NC.Google Scholar
  42. Schwartz, R.S., Lederman, N. & Lederman, J. (2008). An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: The VOSI questionnaire. Paper presented at the International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  43. Simpson, R. D. & Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grades 6 through 10. Science Education, 69, 511–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang, J. R. & Lin, S. W. (2008). Examining reflective thinking: A study of changes in methods students’ conceptions and understandings of inquiry teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, D.C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Ford, M.J. & Lai, G. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inquiry skills in a robotics summer camp. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2):201–216.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allison Antink-Meyer
    • 1
  • Stephen Bartos
    • 2
    Email author
  • Judith S. Lederman
    • 3
  • Norman G. Lederman
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Teaching and LearningIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA
  2. 2.Womack Educational Leadership DepartmentMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA
  3. 3.Mathematics & Science Education DepartmentIllinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations