PROFESSIONAL NOTICING PRACTICES OF NOVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATORS

Article

ABSTRACT

The focus on professional noticing in mathematics education has recently gained increased interest as researchers work to understand how and what is noticed and how this translates into practice. Much of this work has focused on the professional noticing practices of inservice teachers and preservice teachers, with less attention focused on those educating teachers. This research explores how novice mathematics teacher educators professionally notice as they engage in teaching experiments and create models of student’s mathematical thinking. Findings indicate the novice teacher educators are including some evaluative comments in their professional noticing practices but lack in-depth interpretive analysis about student thinking and rarely make connections between student’s thinking and the broader principles of teaching and learning. These findings provide evidence for the importance of supporting teacher educators with developing their abilities to professionally notice.

KEYWORDS

mathematics model building professional noticing teacher educators teaching experiments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. An, S. & Wu, Z. (2012). Enhancing mathematics teachers’ knowledge of students’ thinking from assessing and analyzing misconceptions in homework. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 717–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dirkin, G. R. (1983). Cognitive tunneling: Use of visual information under stress. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Franke, M., Webb, N., Chan, A., Battey, D., Ing, M., Freund, D. & De, T. (2009). Eliciting student thinking in elementary mathematics classrooms: Practices that support understanding. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goleman, D. (1985). Vital lies, simple truths: The psychology of self-deception. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  5. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jacobs, V., Lamb, L., Philipp, R. & Schappelle, B. (2011). Deciding how to respond on the basis of children’s understandings. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 97–116). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 169–202.Google Scholar
  8. Kazemi, E., Elliott, R., Mumme, J., Carroll, C., Lesseig, K. & Kelley-Petersen, M. (2011). Noticing leaders’ thinking about videocases of teachers engaged in mathematics tasks in professional development. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 188–203). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: Roots and branches. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 35–50). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Miller, K. (2011). Situation awareness in teaching: What educators can learn from video-based research in other fields? In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 51–65). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Norton, A. H. & McCloskey, A. (2008). Teaching experiments and professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. & Philipp, R. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 3–14). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Star, J. & Strickland, S. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Steffe, L. & Thompson, P. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelley & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Stigler, J. & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. United States Math Recovery Council (2005, July) Math recovery overview. http://www.saine.com/mathrecovery/itree/uploads/MR%20Overview%20White%20Paper.pdf.
  17. van Es, E. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 134–151). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. van Es, E. A. & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weiland, I., Hudson, R. & Amador, J. (2014). Preservice formative assessnent interviews: The development of competent quetioning. International Journal of Science and Mathenatics Education,12, 329–352Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of IdahoCoeur d’AleneUSA

Personalised recommendations