Student attitudes toward mathematics play an important role in the teaching and learning processes of mathematics as positive attitudes correlate with higher student achievement. This paper aims to develop and explore the validity of a Chinese version of the short attitudes toward mathematics inventory (short ATMI) for Taiwanese undergraduates, and further to examine the measurement invariance across gender. The results suggest that, based on the Taiwanese sample, the model with some items excluded has better fit indices than the original model. The generalization of the four-factor construct was also confirmed. The Cronbach’s alpha for total and subscales of the modified short ATMI were satisfactory, and moreover, convergent and discriminant validity were shown. Finally, measurement invariance of the inventory across gender was also demonstrated. This study suggests that the Chinese version of the short ATMI is a reliable, valid, and compact instrument that quickly and efficiently measures student attitudes toward mathematics.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adediwura, A. A. (2011). The development and confirmatory factor analysis of a scale for the measurement of gifted students attitude towards mathematics. World Journal of Education, 1(1), 52–62.
Afari, E. (2013). Examining the factorial validity of the attitudes towards mathematics inventory (ATMI) in the United Arab Emirates: Confirmatory factor analysis. International Review of Contemporary Learning Research, 2(1), 15–29.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equation program manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.
Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
Clarke, D. (2013). The validity-comparability compromise in crosscultural studies in mathematics education. Hyväksytty julkaisuun Proceedings of the 8th CERME conference. Antalya, Turkey: ERME.
Daskalogianni, K. & Simpson, A. (2000). Towards a definition of attitude: The relationship between the affective and the cognitive in pre-university students. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3 (pp. 217–224).
Di Martino, P. & Zan, R. (2010). ‘Me and maths’: Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teachers Education, 13(1), 27–48.
Duda, G. & Garrett, K. (2008). Blogging in the physics classroom: A research-based approach to shaping students’ attitudes toward physics. American Journal of Physics, 76(11), 1054–1065.
Eshun, B. (2004). Sex-differences in attitude of students towards mathematics in secondary schools. Mathematics Connection, 4, 1–13.
Farooq, M. & Shah, S. (2008). Students’ attitude towards mathematics. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 46(1), 75–83.
Fennema, E. & Sherman, J. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instrument designed to measure attitudes toward mathematics, toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7, 324–326.
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R. & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics-A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497–514.
Ganotice, F. (2010). A confirmatory factor analysis of scores on Inventory of School Motivation, Sense of Self Scale, and Facilitating Conditions Questionnaire: A study using Philippine sample. The Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review, 1, 59–77.
Gasiorowski, J. H. (1998). The relationship between student characteristics and mathematics achievement. Morgantown, West Virginia: Doctoral Dissertation.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Educational, Inc.
Hemmings, B., Grootenboer, P. & Kay, R. (2011). Predicting mathematics achievement: The influence of prior achievement and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 691–705.
Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
Hung, H. C., Shieh, V. & Lo, H. W. (2013). A study on gender-stereotypes and mathematics-related professional development: An example to the female engineering majors in science and technology university. Journal of Pingtung University of Education, 40, 77–104.
Joreskog, K. & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific software International.
Kind, P., Jones, K. & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871–893.
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Kruglansky, A. (2007). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Leung, F. K. S. (2006). Mathematics Education in East Asia and the West: Does Culture Matter? New ICMI Study Series, 9, 21–46.
Liau, A. K., Kassim, M. & Loke, M. L. T. (2007). Reliability and validity of a Malay Translation of the Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales. The Mathematics Educator, 10(2), 71–84.
Lim, S. Y. & Chapman, E. (2013). Development of a short form of the attitudes toward mathematics inventory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(1), 145–16.
Ma, X. & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26–47.
Mata, M. L., Monteiro, V. & Peixoto, F. (2012). Attitudes towards mathematics: Effects of individual, motivational, and social support factors. Child Development Research. doi:10.1155/2012/876028.
Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B. & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351–373.
Milfont, T. L. & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–121.
Mohamed, L. & Waheed, H. (2011). Secondary students’ attitude towards mathematics in a selected school of Maldives. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(15), 277–281.
Mulhern, F. & Rae, G. (1998). Development of a shortened form of the Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 295–306.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Garden, R. A., O’Connor, K. M., Chrostowski, S. J. & Smith, T. A. (2000). TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report. Boston: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD Publication.
Pierce, R., Stacey, K. & Barkatsas, A. N. (2007). A scale for monitoring students’ attitudes to learning mathematics with technology. Computers and Education, 48(2), 285–300.
Piht, S. & Eisenchmidt, E. (2008). Pupils’ attitudes toward mathematics: Comparative research between Estonian and Finnish practice schools. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 9, 97–106.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M. & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
Sumpter, L. (2013). Themes and interplay of beliefs in mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1115–1135.
Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Tapia, M. & Marsh, G. E., II. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 16–21.
Tapia, M. & Marsh, G. E., II. (2005). Attitudes toward mathematics inventory redux. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(3), 272–275.
Tuohilampi, L., Hannula, M. S., Giaconi, V., Laine, A. & Näveri, L. (2013). Comparing the structures of 3rd graders’ mathematics-related affect in Chile and Finland. Hyväksytty julkaisuun Proceedings of the 8th CERME conference. Antalya, Turkey: ERME.
White, A. L., Way, J., Perry, B. & Southwell, B. (2005). Mathematical attitudes, beliefs and achievement in primary pre-service mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 7, 35–52.
Wong, N. Y., Wong, W. Y. & Wong, E. W. Y. (2012). What do the Chinese value in (mathematics) education? ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(1), 9–19.
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, SH., Huang, YC. DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF A CHINESE VERSION OF THE SHORT ATTITUDES TOWARD MATHEMATICS INVENTORY. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 193–216 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9563-8
- attitudes toward mathematics
- confirmatory factor analysis
- measurement invariance
- student attitudes assessment