Skip to main content
Log in

THE KNOWLEDGE BASE OF SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS IN TEACHING: A CASE STUDY OF A PROFESSIONAL SCIENTIST AS A BEGINNING TEACHER

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One method of addressing the shortage of science and mathematics teachers is to train scientists and other science-related professionals to become teachers. Advocates argue that as discipline experts these career changers can relate the subject matter knowledge to various contexts and applications in teaching. In this paper, through interviews and classroom observations with a former scientist and her students, we examine how one career changer used her expertise in microbiology to teach microscopy. These data provided the basis for a description of the teacher’s instruction which was then analysed for components of domain knowledge for teaching. Consistent with the literature, the findings revealed that this career changer needed to develop her pedagogical knowledge. However, an interesting finding was that the teacher’s subject matter as a science teacher differed substantively from her knowledge as a scientist. This finding challenges the assumption that subject matter is readily transferable across professions and provides insight into how to better prepare and support career changers to transition from scientist to science teacher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H. & Phelps, G. C. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M. & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B., Daughtrey, A. & Wieder, A. (2009). Teaching effectiveness and the conditions that matter most in high-needs schools: A policy brief. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Teaching Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2004). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L. & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 1–39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1981). Stimulated recall: A method for research on teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(2), 211–217. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1981.tb02474.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2003). What new teachers need to learn. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J. & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.). (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H., Ball, D. L. & Schilling, S. (2008). Unpacking “pedagogical content knowledge”: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. doi:10.3102/0034654311403323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, C. & Green, K. (2005). Perceiving classroom aggression: The influence of setting, intervention style and group perceptions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 587–602. doi:10.1348/000709905x25058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Original work published 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., Berry, A. & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A., Firestone, J. B., Wong, S. S., Ortega, I., Adams, K. & Bang, E. (2011). Beginning secondary science teacher induction: A two-year mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1199–1224. doi:10.1002/tea.20444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A. & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N. R. C. (Ed.). (2000). Attracting science and mathematics Ph.D.s to secondary school education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., Jang, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C. & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching?: Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 245–260. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9163-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piburn, M. & Sawada, D. (2000). Reformed teaching observational protocol (RTOP): ACEPT Technical Report IN00-3. Retrieved 21/07/2013 from http://www.public.asu.edu/~anton1/AssessArticles/Assessments/Chemistry%20Assessments/RTOP%20Reference%20Manual.pdf.

  • Reilly, M. (2009). Opening spaces of possibility: The teacher as bricoleur. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(5), 376–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. & Simmons, P. (1994). Self-Q research method and analysis, teacher pedagogical philosophy interview: Theoretical background and samples of data. Athens, GA: Department of Science Education, University of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A. & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehrig, G. H. & Luft, J. A. (2004). Inquiry teaching in high school chemistry classrooms: The role of knowledge and beliefs. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(10), 1510–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9–17. doi:10.3102/0013189x024006009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K. (2011). Scholarship of teaching and teachers’ understanding of subject matter. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2008). Learning from “Didactikids”: An impetus for revisiting the empty number line. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(3), 6–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D. & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watters, J.J. & Diezmann, C. M. (2012). Identity development in career-changing beginning teachers: A qualitative study of professional scientists becoming school teachers. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 13–17 April 2012, Vancouver Convention Center, Vancouver. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/49569/.

  • Watters, J. J. & Diezmann, C. M. (2013). Recruiting career-change professionals as teachers: The challenge of socialisation into teaching. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Conference April 27-May 1, San Francisco.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James J. Watters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diezmann, C.M., Watters, J.J. THE KNOWLEDGE BASE OF SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS IN TEACHING: A CASE STUDY OF A PROFESSIONAL SCIENTIST AS A BEGINNING TEACHER. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 13, 1517–1537 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9561-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9561-x

Key words

Navigation