THE KNOWLEDGE BASE OF SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS IN TEACHING: A CASE STUDY OF A PROFESSIONAL SCIENTIST AS A BEGINNING TEACHER
- 556 Downloads
One method of addressing the shortage of science and mathematics teachers is to train scientists and other science-related professionals to become teachers. Advocates argue that as discipline experts these career changers can relate the subject matter knowledge to various contexts and applications in teaching. In this paper, through interviews and classroom observations with a former scientist and her students, we examine how one career changer used her expertise in microbiology to teach microscopy. These data provided the basis for a description of the teacher’s instruction which was then analysed for components of domain knowledge for teaching. Consistent with the literature, the findings revealed that this career changer needed to develop her pedagogical knowledge. However, an interesting finding was that the teacher’s subject matter as a science teacher differed substantively from her knowledge as a scientist. This finding challenges the assumption that subject matter is readily transferable across professions and provides insight into how to better prepare and support career changers to transition from scientist to science teacher.
Key wordsbeginning teachers career change contextual knowledge pedagogical content knowledge science teaching scientist STEM subject matter knowledge
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H. & Phelps, G. C. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.Google Scholar
- Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M. & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. doi: 10.3102/0002831209345157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berry, B., Daughtrey, A. & Wieder, A. (2009). Teaching effectiveness and the conditions that matter most in high-needs schools: A policy brief. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Teaching Quality.Google Scholar
- Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2004). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L. & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 1–39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Darling-Hammond, L. & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.Google Scholar
- Feiman-Nemser, S. (2003). What new teachers need to learn. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 25–29.Google Scholar
- Gess-Newsome, J. & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.). (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hill, H., Ball, D. L. & Schilling, S. (2008). Unpacking “pedagogical content knowledge”: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.Google Scholar
- Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Original work published 1962.Google Scholar
- Loughran, J., Berry, A. & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
- Luft, J. A. & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38–63.Google Scholar
- Morris, N. R. C. (Ed.). (2000). Attracting science and mathematics Ph.D.s to secondary school education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Piburn, M. & Sawada, D. (2000). Reformed teaching observational protocol (RTOP): ACEPT Technical Report IN00-3. Retrieved 21/07/2013 from http://www.public.asu.edu/~anton1/AssessArticles/Assessments/Chemistry%20Assessments/RTOP%20Reference%20Manual.pdf.
- Richardson, L. & Simmons, P. (1994). Self-Q research method and analysis, teacher pedagogical philosophy interview: Theoretical background and samples of data. Athens, GA: Department of Science Education, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
- Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Inc.Google Scholar
- Trigwell, K. (2011). Scholarship of teaching and teachers’ understanding of subject matter. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
- Watters, J.J. & Diezmann, C. M. (2012). Identity development in career-changing beginning teachers: A qualitative study of professional scientists becoming school teachers. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 13–17 April 2012, Vancouver Convention Center, Vancouver. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/49569/.
- Watters, J. J. & Diezmann, C. M. (2013). Recruiting career-change professionals as teachers: The challenge of socialisation into teaching. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Conference April 27-May 1, San Francisco.Google Scholar