• Amanda L. GlazeEmail author
  • M. Jenice Goldston
  • John Dantzler


Evolution continues to be a controversial topic around the world but nowhere is this more apparent locally than in the Southeastern region of the USA. In this study, we explored acceptance and rejection of evolution among pre-service science teachers in a teaching college in the rural Southeast and sought to determine (1) what relationships exist between the worldview variables and acceptance of evolution among pre-service secondary science teachers? and (2) Which combination of these variables explains the most statistically significant amount of variance in acceptance of evolution among pre-service secondary science teachers? Regression analysis was used to determine the best-fit model predicting levels of acceptance in this sample, explaining 45 % of variance in acceptance of evolution in 4 variables. The result of this study sheds light on possible remediation for low acceptance of evolution and directions for improved preparation of future science teachers relative to teaching and learning evolution.

Key words

acceptance biology content knowledge evolution nature of science pre-service science teachers science education 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abd-el-Khalik, F. & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history and science courses on students views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095.Google Scholar
  2. Akyol, G., Tekkaya, C. & Sungur, S. (2010). The contribution of understanding of evolutionary theory and nature of science to pre-service science teachers’ acceptance of evolutionary theory. Procedia Social & Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1889–1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alters, B. J. (1996). Relationships between acceptance or rejection of evolution by college freshman and selected non-religiously oriented factors (Doctoral dissertation or thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9636316).Google Scholar
  4. Alters, B. J. & Alters, S. M. (2001). Defending evolution: A guide to the creation/evolution controversy. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar
  5. Alters, B. J. & Nelson, C. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. International Journal of Organic Evolution, 56, 1891–1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aydeniz, M. & Bilican, K. (2013). What do scientists know about the nature of science? A case study of novice scientists’ views of NOS. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi: 10.1007/s10763-013-9449-1.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, J. O. (2013). Acceptance of evolution and support for teaching creationism in public schools: The conditional impact of educational attainment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(1), 216–228.Google Scholar
  8. Bowman, K. L. (2008). The evolution battles in high school science classes: Who is teaching what? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(2), 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, W. (2009). Does the nature of science influence college students’ learning of biological evolution? (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesesdatabase (UMI No. 3373974).Google Scholar
  10. Carnegie Foundation (2010). Carnegie classifications, institutional profile. Available from
  11. Cobern, W. W. (1994). Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 583–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cobern, W. W. (2000). The nature of science and the role of knowledge and belief. Science & Education, 9, 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cobern, W.W. & Loving, C.C. (2000). Scientific worldviews: A case study of four high school science teachers. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5(2). Available from Accessed 13 November 2011
  14. Cobern, W. W. & Loving, C. C. (2002). Investigation of preservice elementary teachers’ thinking about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1016–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deniz, H., Cetin, F. & Yilmaz, I. (2011). Examining the relationships among acceptance of evolution, religiosity, and teaching preference for evolution in Turkish preservice biology teachers. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 31(4), 1.1–1.9.Google Scholar
  16. Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A. & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish pre-service biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 420–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Donnelly, L. A., Kazempour, M. & Amirshokoohi, A. (2009). High school students’ perceptions of evolution instruction: Acceptance and evolution learning experiences. Research in Science Education, 39(5), 643–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fahrenwald, C.R. (1999). Biology teachers’ acceptance and understanding of evolution and nature of science (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9937374).Google Scholar
  19. Farber, P. (2003). Teaching evolution & the nature of science. The American Biology Teacher, 65(5), 347–354.Google Scholar
  20. Gallup, G. (2011). Evolution, creationism and intelligent design. Available from Accessed 3 September 2011
  21. Goldston, M. J. & Kyzer, P. (2009). Teaching evolution: Narratives with a view from three southern biology teachers in the USA. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(7), 762–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffiths, A. K. & Thompson, J. (1993). Secondary school students’ understanding of scientific processes: An interview study. Research in Science and Technological Education, 11, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ha, M., Haury, D. L. & Nehm, R. H. (2012). Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 95–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansson, L. & Redfors, A. (2007). Upper secondary students in group discussions about physics and our presuppositions of the world. Science & Education, 16, 1007–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hansson, L., Redfors, A. & Rosberg, M. (2010). Students’ socio-scientific reasoning in an astrobiological context during work with a digital learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(4), 388–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heibert, P. G. (2008). Transforming worldviews: An anthropological understanding of how people change. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
  27. Ingram, E. L. & Nelson, C. E. (2006). Relationship between achievement and students’ acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, R. L. (1986). The acceptance of evolutionary theory by biology majors in college of the West North Central states. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(7), 1893a.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, K. A., Hill, E. D. & Cohen, A. B. (2011). Integrating the study of culture and religion: Toward a psychology of worldview. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(3), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kearney, M. (1975). World view theory and study. Annual Review of Anthropology, 4, 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kincheloe, J. L., & Pinar, W. F. (Eds.). (1991). Curriculum as social psychoanalysis: The significance of place. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lederman, N. G. & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior? Science Education, 71, 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, O. (1999). Science knowledge, world views, and information sources in social and cultural contexts: Making sense after a natural disaster. Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 187–219.Google Scholar
  34. Martin-Hansen, L. M. (2006). First-year college students’ conflict with religion and science. Science & Education, 17, 317–357. doi: 10.1007/s11191-006-9039-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McComas, W. F. (2003). A textbook case of the nature of science: Laws and theories in the science of biology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moore, R., Brooks, D. C. & Cotner, S. (2011). The relation of high school biology courses & students’ religious beliefs to college students’ knowledge of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 73(4), 222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morrison, J. A., Raab, F. & Ingram, D. (2009). Factors influencing elementary and secondary teachers’ views on the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 384–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nadelson, L. S. & Sinatra, G. E. (2009). Education professionals’ knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(4), 490–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nadelson, L. S. & Sinatra, G. M. (2010). Shifting acceptance of evolution: Promising evidence of the influence of the “understanding evolution” website. The Researcher, 23(1), 13–29.Google Scholar
  40. National Academy of Sciences (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. National Association of Biology Teachers (2008). Statement on teaching evolution. Available from
  42. National Research Council (2013). Next generation science standards. Available from
  43. National Science Teachers Association (2004). NSTA position statement: The teaching of evolution. Available from
  44. Nehm, R. H., Kim, S. Y. & Sheppard, K. (2009). Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution: Biology versus non-biology teachers. Science Education, 93, 1122–1146. doi: 10.1002/sce.20340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. & Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of the relationship between engagement in scientific argumentation and conceptual knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1415–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oliveira, A. W., Cook, K. & Buck, G. A. (2011). Framing evolution discussion intellectually. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Osif, B. A. (1997). Evolution and religious beliefs: A survey of Pennsylvania high school teachers. The American Biology Teacher, 59, 552–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). Stamford, USA: Thompson Learning, Inc.Google Scholar
  49. Rudolph, J. L. & Stewart, J. (1998). Evolution and the nature of science: On the historical discord and its implication for education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1069–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rutledge, M. L. & Mitchell, M. A. (2002). High school biology teachers’ knowledge structure, acceptance, & teaching of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 64(1), 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rutledge, M. L. & Sadler, K. C. (2007). Reliability of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution (mate) instrument with university students. The American Biology Teacher, 69(6), 332–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rutledge, M. L. & Warden, M. A. (2000). Evolutionary theory, the nature of science and high school biology teachers: Critical relationships. The American Biology Teacher, 62(1), 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scharmann, L. C. (2005). A proactive strategy for teaching evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 67, 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F. & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A. & Sowell, S. (2006). Describing teachers’ conceptual ecologies for the nature of science. Science Education, 90, 874–906. doi: 10.1002/sce.20153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  57. Thagard, P. & Findlay, S. (2010). Getting to Darwin: Obstacles to accepting evolution by natural selection. Science & Education, 19, 625–636. doi: 10.1007/s11191-009-9204-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Topcu, M. S. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ epistemological beliefs in physics, chemistry, and biology: A mixed study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 433–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Urhahne, D., Kremer, K. & Mayer, J. (2011). Conceptions of the nature of science—are they general or context specific? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 707–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wiles, J.R. (2008). Factors potentially influencing student acceptance of biological evolution (Doctoral dissertation or master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database.Google Scholar
  61. Wiles, J. R. & Alters, B. (2011). Effects of an educational experience incorporating an inventory of factors potentially influencing student acceptance of biological evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 2559–2585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wiley, C.H. (2003). Reflection on the difficulties of teaching evolution in high school biology. (Doctoral dissertation or master’s thesis). Available from

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda L. Glaze
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • M. Jenice Goldston
    • 1
  • John Dantzler
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.Jacksonville State UniversityJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations