Advertisement

A TIME HAZARD ANALYSIS OF STUDENT PERSISTENCE: A US UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS MAJOR EXPERIENCE

  • Saïd BahiEmail author
  • Devin Higgins
  • Patrick Staley
Article

Abstract

Individual level data for the entire cohort of undergraduate mathematics students of a relatively small US public university was used to estimate the risk that a student will switch major to another one before degree completion. The data set covers the period from 1999 to 2006. Survival tables and logistic models were estimated and used to discuss student’s switch from their initially planned mathematics major to another. An important goal of low enrollment university departments is to increase enrollment and to attain a high retention rate. Major switching indicates a failure of these departments to retain potentially able students. Students’ retention is also an important issue for university programs evaluation and funding. The goal of this work is to investigate the timing of switching major, to a different one, by mathematics students. We estimated the probability of occurrence of this event for different school terms and when this event is most likely to occur. The empirical results suggest that the probability of a mathematics student switching major varies from a high 23 % early in student’s major enrollment to a low of about 6 % in later semesters. Mathematics education majors, however, showed inferior risk of switching major. Gender differences were also examined, showing no significant gender differences.

Keywords

logit major mathematics probability STEM survival table switching risk 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelman, C. (1998). Women and men of the engineering path: A model for analyses of undergraduate careers. Research Report (143) 0-16-049551-2. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlburg, D. A., McCall B. P. (2002). Time to Dropout from College: A hazard Model with Endogenous Waiting, working paper, Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  3. Astin, A. W. (1997). How “Good” is your institution’s retention rate? Research in Higher Education, 38(6), 647–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, J. B. & Braxton, J. M. (1998). Revising Tinto’s internationalist theory of student departure through theory elaboration: Examining the role of organizational attributes in the persistence process. Research in Higher Education, 39(2), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A. & Castaneda, M. B. (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. Journal of Higher Education, 64(2), 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chizmar, J. F. A. (2000). Discrete-time hazard analysis of the role of the gender in persistence in the economics major. Journal of Economics Education, 31(2), 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Efron, B. (1998). Logistic regression, survival analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier curve. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Theory and Methods, 83(402), 414–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellis, J., Rasmussen, C. & Duncan, K. (2013). Switcher and persister experience in Calculus I, Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate mathematics Education, Vol. 2, February 21.23, 2013, Denver, Co.Google Scholar
  9. French, B.F., Immekus, J., C. & Oakes, W. C.. (2003). A structural model of engineering student success and persistence. In Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  10. Griffith, A. L., (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Working paper, Published by the Cornell higher education Research Institute, Cornell University, http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/workingpapers/122/.
  11. Higher Education Research Institute (HERI), (2010). Degrees of success: Bachelor’s degree completion rates among initial STEM majors, Research Brief. www.heri.ucla.edu/publications-main.php.
  12. Hovarth J. Beaudin B. Q., Wright S. P (1992). Persisting in the Introductory Economics Courses: An Exploration of Gender Differences, Research in Economic Education, 101-108.Google Scholar
  13. Jensen, F. & Sjaastad, J. (2013). A Norwegian out-of-school mathematics project’s influence on secondary students’ stem motivation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1437–1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalsner, L. (1991). Issues in college student retention. Higher Education Extension Service Review, 3(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  15. Kiefer, N. M. (1998). Economics duration data and hazard functions. Journal of Economics Literature, 26(2), 646–679.Google Scholar
  16. Kuh G. D., Kinzie, J. Buckley J., A. & Hayek J., C. (2006). What matters to student success: a review of the literature. Published by the National Postsecondary education Cooperative. http://nces.ed.gov/npec/pdf/kuh_team_report.pdf.
  17. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H. & Tang, J. (2009). Developing a classification system for engineering student characteristics affecting college enrollment and retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 361–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu, A., Ruiz, S., DeAngelo, L. & Pryor, J. (2009). Findings from the 2008 Administration of the College Senior Survey (CSS): National Aggregates, College Senior Survey Publications, http://www.heri.ucla.edu/cssPublications.php.
  19. Meadows, L. A., Nidiffer, J., Ball, S. R., Davis, C. Finelli, C. J. & Schultz, W. (2006). 236th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, session S4G, October 28-31, 2006, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  20. Mohn, R. S. (2008). Comparison of logistic regression and latent variable modeling techniques for college student perseverance. American Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 31–41.Google Scholar
  21. Murtaugh, P. A., Burns, L. D. & Schuster, J. (1999). Predicting the retention of university students. Research in Higher Education, 40(1), 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Notices of the American Mathematical Society (2008). 2007 Annual Survey of Mathematical Sciences, third report, 55(10), 1271-1282.Google Scholar
  23. Notices of the American Mathematical Society (2010). 2009 Annual Survey of the Mathematical Sciences (third report), 57(10), 1306–1317.Google Scholar
  24. Ohland, M., Sheppard, S. G., Lichtenstein, O., Eris, O., Chachra, D. D. & Layton, R. R. (2008). Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 259–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Özgür, E., Chachra, D., Chen, H. L., Sheppard, S. D., Ludlow, L., Rosca, C., Bailey, T. & Toye, G. (2010). Outcomes of a longitudinal administration of the persistence in engineering survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 371–395.Google Scholar
  26. Porter, S. R. & Umbach, P. D. (2006). College major choice: an analysis of person-environment fit, Research in Higher education, Vol. 47, No. 4, DOI:  10.1007/s11162-005-9002-3.
  27. Reason, R. D. (2009). An examination of persistence research through the lens of a comprehensive conceptual framework. Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press, DOI:  10.1353/csd.0.0098.
  28. Ronco, S. L. (1994). Meandering ways: Studying student stopout with survival analysis. New Orleans: Annual forum of the association for institutional research.Google Scholar
  29. Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  30. Sheppard, S., C. Atman, R. Stevens, and L. Fleming. 2004. Studying engineering student experience: Design of a longitudinal study. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, J. P. & Naylor, R. A. (2001). Dropping out of university: a statistical analysis of the probability of withdrawal for UK university students. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society-Series A, 164, 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Strenta, A. C., Elliot, R., Adair, R., Matier, M. & Scott, J. (1994). Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher education, 35(5), 513–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tinto, V. (2004). Student retention and graduation: Facing the truth, living with the consequences (Occasional Paper 1). Washington DC: The Pell Institution for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.Google Scholar
  35. Titus, M. A. (2004). An examination of the influence of institutional context on student persistence at 4-year colleges and universities. A multi-level approach. Research in Higher Education, 45(7), 673–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Willet, J. B. & Singer, J. D. (1991). From whether to when: New methods for studying drop out and teacher attrition. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 407–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zwick, R. & Sklar, J. C. V. (2005). Predicting college grades and degree completion using high school grades and sat scores: The role of the student ethnicity and first language. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of mathematicsSouthern Utah UniversityCedar CityUSA
  2. 2.Southern Utah UniversityCedar CityUSA

Personalised recommendations