A TIME HAZARD ANALYSIS OF STUDENT PERSISTENCE: A US UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS MAJOR EXPERIENCE
Individual level data for the entire cohort of undergraduate mathematics students of a relatively small US public university was used to estimate the risk that a student will switch major to another one before degree completion. The data set covers the period from 1999 to 2006. Survival tables and logistic models were estimated and used to discuss student’s switch from their initially planned mathematics major to another. An important goal of low enrollment university departments is to increase enrollment and to attain a high retention rate. Major switching indicates a failure of these departments to retain potentially able students. Students’ retention is also an important issue for university programs evaluation and funding. The goal of this work is to investigate the timing of switching major, to a different one, by mathematics students. We estimated the probability of occurrence of this event for different school terms and when this event is most likely to occur. The empirical results suggest that the probability of a mathematics student switching major varies from a high 23 % early in student’s major enrollment to a low of about 6 % in later semesters. Mathematics education majors, however, showed inferior risk of switching major. Gender differences were also examined, showing no significant gender differences.
Keywordslogit major mathematics probability STEM survival table switching risk
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adelman, C. (1998). Women and men of the engineering path: A model for analyses of undergraduate careers. Research Report (143) 0-16-049551-2. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents.Google Scholar
- Ahlburg, D. A., McCall B. P. (2002). Time to Dropout from College: A hazard Model with Endogenous Waiting, working paper, Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Ellis, J., Rasmussen, C. & Duncan, K. (2013). Switcher and persister experience in Calculus I, Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate mathematics Education, Vol. 2, February 21.23, 2013, Denver, Co.Google Scholar
- French, B.F., Immekus, J., C. & Oakes, W. C.. (2003). A structural model of engineering student success and persistence. In Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
- Griffith, A. L., (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Working paper, Published by the Cornell higher education Research Institute, Cornell University, http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/workingpapers/122/.
- Higher Education Research Institute (HERI), (2010). Degrees of success: Bachelor’s degree completion rates among initial STEM majors, Research Brief. www.heri.ucla.edu/publications-main.php.
- Hovarth J. Beaudin B. Q., Wright S. P (1992). Persisting in the Introductory Economics Courses: An Exploration of Gender Differences, Research in Economic Education, 101-108.Google Scholar
- Kalsner, L. (1991). Issues in college student retention. Higher Education Extension Service Review, 3(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
- Kiefer, N. M. (1998). Economics duration data and hazard functions. Journal of Economics Literature, 26(2), 646–679.Google Scholar
- Kuh G. D., Kinzie, J. Buckley J., A. & Hayek J., C. (2006). What matters to student success: a review of the literature. Published by the National Postsecondary education Cooperative. http://nces.ed.gov/npec/pdf/kuh_team_report.pdf.
- Liu, A., Ruiz, S., DeAngelo, L. & Pryor, J. (2009). Findings from the 2008 Administration of the College Senior Survey (CSS): National Aggregates, College Senior Survey Publications, http://www.heri.ucla.edu/cssPublications.php.
- Meadows, L. A., Nidiffer, J., Ball, S. R., Davis, C. Finelli, C. J. & Schultz, W. (2006). 236th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, session S4G, October 28-31, 2006, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
- Mohn, R. S. (2008). Comparison of logistic regression and latent variable modeling techniques for college student perseverance. American Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 31–41.Google Scholar
- Notices of the American Mathematical Society (2008). 2007 Annual Survey of Mathematical Sciences, third report, 55(10), 1271-1282.Google Scholar
- Notices of the American Mathematical Society (2010). 2009 Annual Survey of the Mathematical Sciences (third report), 57(10), 1306–1317.Google Scholar
- Özgür, E., Chachra, D., Chen, H. L., Sheppard, S. D., Ludlow, L., Rosca, C., Bailey, T. & Toye, G. (2010). Outcomes of a longitudinal administration of the persistence in engineering survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 371–395.Google Scholar
- Porter, S. R. & Umbach, P. D. (2006). College major choice: an analysis of person-environment fit, Research in Higher education, Vol. 47, No. 4, DOI: 10.1007/s11162-005-9002-3.
- Reason, R. D. (2009). An examination of persistence research through the lens of a comprehensive conceptual framework. Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press, DOI: 10.1353/csd.0.0098.
- Ronco, S. L. (1994). Meandering ways: Studying student stopout with survival analysis. New Orleans: Annual forum of the association for institutional research.Google Scholar
- Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
- Sheppard, S., C. Atman, R. Stevens, and L. Fleming. 2004. Studying engineering student experience: Design of a longitudinal study. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
- Tinto, V. (2004). Student retention and graduation: Facing the truth, living with the consequences (Occasional Paper 1). Washington DC: The Pell Institution for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.Google Scholar