Advertisement

AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF TAIWANESE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS' CONCEPTIONS OF SCHOOL MATHEMATICS, SCHOOL STATISTICS, AND THEIR DIFFERENCES

  • Kai-Lin YangEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study used phenomenography, a qualitative method, to investigate Taiwanese mathematics teachers’ conceptions of school mathematics, school statistics, and their differences. To collect data, we interviewed five mathematics teachers by open questions. They also responded to statements drawn on mathematical/statistical conceptions and epistemological beliefs in the literature. We also conducted a survey of 22 mathematics teachers who responded to open-ended questions for comparing and justifying the findings from the interview data. We found that the characteristic features of the categories and dimensions of these teachers’ conceptions were different from those in the relevant literature. All of the mathematics teachers’ conceptions of school mathematics, school statistics, and their differences could be identified by these categories and dimensions as reflected by their characteristic features. We discuss our findings and their implications for further research and teacher education programs.

Key words

conception epistemology mathematics teacher philosophy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ben-Zvi, D. & Friedlander, A. (1997). Statistical thinking in a technological environment. In J. B. Garfield & G. Burrill (Eds.), Research on the role of technology in teaching and learning statistics (pp. 45–55). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Burrill, G. & Biehler, R. (2011). Fundamental statistical ideas in the school curriculum and in training teachers. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics-challenges for teaching and teacher education: A Joint ICMI/IASE study: The 18th ICMI study (pp. 57–69). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan, K. W. & Elliott, R. G. (2000). Exploratory study of epistemological beliefs of Hong Kong teacher education students: Resolving conceptual and empirical issues. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chick, H. L. & Pierce, R. U. (2008). Teaching statistics at the primary school level: Beliefs, affordances, and pedagogical content knowledge. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, and A. Rossman (Eds.), Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics. Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008 IASE Round Table Conference, ICMI and IASE, Monterrey. Retrieved from http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications.
  5. Chiu, M. S. (2012). Identification and assessment of Taiwanese children’s conceptions of learning mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 163–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cross, D. I. (2009). Alignment, cohesion, and change: Examining mathematics teachers’ belief structures and their influence on instructional practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(5), 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. delMas, R. (2004). A comparison of mathematical and statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 79–95). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Döhrmann, M., Kaiser, G. & Blömeke, S. (2012). The conceptualisation of mathematics competencies in the international teacher education study TEDS-M. ZDM, 44(3), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Felbrich, A., Kaiser, G. & Schmotz, C. (2012). The cultural dimension of beliefs: An investigation of future primary teachers' epistemological beliefs concerning the nature of mathematics in 15 countries. ZDM, 44(3), 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gattuso, L. & Ottaviani, M. G. (2011). Complementing mathematical thinking and statistical thinking in school mathematics. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics-Challenges for teaching and teacher education: A joint ICMI/IASE study (pp. 121–132). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Hancock, C., Kaput, J. J. & Goldsmith, L. T. (1992). Authentic inquiry with data: Critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27, 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsieh, F. J., Wu, P. C. & Wang, T. Y. (2014). Why did Taiwan excel: Hot topics and pressing issues. In S. Blömeke, F.-J. Hsieh, G. Kaiser & W. H. Schmidt (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn (pp. 141–161). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kang, N. H. & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 140–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lerman, S. (1983). Problem-solving and knowledge-centred: The influence of philosophy on mathematics teaching. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 14(1), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.Google Scholar
  19. Marton, F. (2000). The structure of awareness. In J. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 102–116). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Marton, F. & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Merriam, S. B., & Associates (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Muis, K. R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 317–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Petocz, P., Reid, A., Wood, L. N., Smith, G. H., Mather, G., Harding, A., … Perrett, G. (2007). Undergraduate students’ conceptions of mathematics: An international study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 439–459.Google Scholar
  24. Pierce, R. & Chick, H. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs about statistics education. In C. Batanero. G. Burrill & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics—Challenges for teaching and teacher education: A joint ICMI/IASE study (pp. 151–162). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Reid, A. & Petocz, P. (2002). Students' conceptions of statistics: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  26. Rossman, A., Chance, B. & Medina, E. (2006). Some important comparisons between statistics and mathematics, and why teachers should care. In G. F. Burrill (Ed.), Thinking and reasoning with data and chance: Sixty-eighth annual yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 323–333). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  27. Scheaffer, R. L. (2006). Statistics and mathematics: On making a happy marriage. NCTM, 309–321.Google Scholar
  28. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seidman, I. E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  30. Shaughnessy, M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on the teaching and learning of mathematics (Vol. 2, pp. 957–1009). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Sigel, I. E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of beliefs. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children (pp. 345–371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Staub, F. C. & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers' pedagogical content beliefs matters for students' achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations