EYE MOVEMENTS REVEAL STUDENTS’ STRATEGIES IN SIMPLE EQUATION SOLVING
- 1k Downloads
Equation rearrangement is an important skill required for problem solving in mathematics and science. Eye movements of 40 university students were recorded while they were rearranging simple algebraic equations. The participants also reported on their strategies during equation solving in a separate questionnaire. The analysis of the behavioral and eye tracking data, namely the accuracy, reaction times, and the number of fixations, revealed that the participants improved their performance during the time course of the measurement. The type of equation also had a significant effect on the score. The results indicated that the number of fixations represents a reliable and sensitive measure that can give valuable insights into participants’ flow of attention during equation solving. A correlation between the number of fixations and participants’ efficiency in equation solving was found, suggesting that the more efficient participants developed adequate strategies, i.e. “knew where to look.” The comparison of eye movement data and questionnaire reports was used for assessing the validity of participants’ metacognitive insights. The measures derived from eye movement data were found to be more objective and reliable than the participants’ reports. These results indicate that the measurement of eye movements provides insights into otherwise unavailable cognitive processes and may be used for exploring problem difficulty, student expertise, and metacognitive processes.
Key wordsalgebra equations expertise eye tracking inverse efficiency metacognition number of fixations problem difficulty strategy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anderson, J. R. & Gluck, K. (2001). What role do cognitive architectures play in intelligent tutoring systems? In V. Klahr & S. M. Carver (Eds.), Cognition & instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 227–262). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Duchowski, A. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static diagrams of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1084–1102.Google Scholar
- Landy, D., Jones, M. N., & Goldstone, R. L. (2008). How the appearance of an operator affects its mathematical precedence. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Washington DC, USA (pp. 2109–2114). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
- Madsen, A. M., Rouinfar, A., Larson, A.M., Loschky, L. C. & Rebello, N.S. (2013). Can short duration visual cues influence students’ reasoning and eye movements in physics problems? Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9, 020104-1–020104-16Google Scholar
- Townsend, J. T. & Ashby, F. G. (1978). Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In N. J. Castellan Jr. & F. Restle (Eds.), Cognitive theory (Volume IIIth ed., pp. 199–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- van Gog, T. & Jarodzka, H. (2013). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance cognitive and metacognitive processes in computer-based learning environments. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 143–156). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar