Advertisement

COMPARING PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ PREFERENCES REGARDING VALUES ABOUT MATHEMATICS TEACHING IN TURKEY AND GERMANY

  • Yüksel DedeEmail author
Article

ABSTRACT

This study presents a small part of a larger study investigating Turkish and German mathematics teachers’ and their students’ values (Values in Mathematics Teaching in Turkey and Germany). The main focus of the study was school levels of the teachers working at primary and secondary schools. The interactions related to nationality were also of interest. The methodology employed in this paper was a descriptive study. The participants were 27 German and 33 Turkish teachers. A five-point Likert-type questionnaire was used as data collection instrument. The data were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics for analysis. Effect size coefficients were also calculated. The results indicated that school levels of the teachers within and between the two nations had a significant effect on the mathematics teachers’ education values. It is thought that these findings may help to show interesting differences in systems in Germany and Turkey.

KEY WORDS

comparison German mathematics teachers mathematics school level of teachers Turkish mathematics teachers values 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atweh, B. & Seah, W. T. (2008). Theorizing values and their study in mathematics education. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Fremantle, Australia.Google Scholar
  2. Baba, T., Iwasaki, H., Ueda, A. & Date, F. (2012). Values in Japanese mathematics education: Their historical development. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 21–32.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop, A. J. (1998). Culture, values and assessment in mathematics. In H. S. Park, Y. H. Choe, H. Shin & S. H. Kim (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 27–37). Seoul, Korea: Korea Society of Mathematical Education.Google Scholar
  5. Bishop, A. J. (2004). Critical issues in researching cultural aspects of mathematics education. Paper presented in Discussion Group 2 at the 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  6. Bishop, A. J. (2008). Values in mathematics and science education: Similarities and differences. Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 5(1), 47–58.Google Scholar
  7. Bishop, A. J., Clarke, B. A., Corrigan, D. J. & Gunstone, R. F. (2005). Teachers’ preferences and practices regarding values in teaching mathematics and science. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: Research, theory and practice (Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 153–160). Sydney, NSW: MERGA.Google Scholar
  8. Bishop, A. J., Clarkson, P., FitzSimons, G. & Seah, W. T. (2001). Studying values in mathematics education: Aspects of the VAMP Project. In J. Novotna (Ed.), European research in mathematics education II (pp. 368–376). Prague: Charles University.Google Scholar
  9. Bishop, A. J. & Whitfield, R. C. (1972). Situations in teaching. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, J. D. (2011). Likert items and scales of measurement? Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 15(1), 10–14.Google Scholar
  11. Bush, W. S. (2003). Bridging the gap between culture and mathematics: The Appalachian perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA., Retrieved from ERIC database (ED478244).Google Scholar
  12. Cai, J. (2006). U.S. and Chinese teachers’ cultural values of representations in mathematics education. In F. K. S. Leung, K. D. Graf & F. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asian and the West (pp. 465–482). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cai, J., Perry, B., Wong, N. & Wang, T. (2009). What is effective teaching: A study of experienced mathematics teachers from Australia, the Chinese mainland, Hong Kong- China, and the United States. In J. Cai, G. Kaiser, B. Perry & N. Wong (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives (pp. 1–36). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Chin, C. (2006). Conceptualising pedagogical values and identities in teacher development. A comparison of Taiwanese and Australian mathematics teachers. In F. K. S. Leung, K.-D. Graf & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 537–547). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chin, C. & Lin, F. L. (2000). A case study of a mathematics teacher’s pedagogical values: Use of a methodological frame-work of interpretation and reflection. Proceedings of National Science Council Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 10(2), 90–101.Google Scholar
  16. Chin, C. & Lin, F. L. (2001). Value-loaded activities in mathematics classroom. Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 2, pp. 249–256). Utrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarkson, P. C. (2007). The development of research into values in mathematics education. In G. Leder & H. Forgasz (Eds.), Stepping stones for the 21st century (p. 223). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Clarkson, P. & Bishop, A. J. (1999). Values and mathematics education. Paper presented at the conference of the International Commission for the Study and Improvement of Mathematics Education (CIEAEM51), University College, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  19. Cooper, P. J., Calloway-Thomas, C., & Simonds, C. (2007). Intercultural communication. A text with readings. Essex, England: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Correa, C., Perry, M., Sims, L., Miller, K. & Fang, G. (2008). Connected and culturally embedded beliefs: Chinese and US teachers talk about how their students best learn mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 140–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dede. Y. (2007). Matematik Okullarda Nasıl Öğretiliyor? Öğrenci Görüsleri Bakımından. Abant Đzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 17–30.Google Scholar
  22. Dede, Y. (2011). Mathematics Education Values Questionnaire for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: Design, Validation, and Results. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 603–626.Google Scholar
  23. Dede, Y. (2012). Why is Mathematics Valuable? A Comparison of Turkish and German Mathematics Teachers. Mathematics Education Bulletin- BOLEMA, 26(44), 1171–1206.Google Scholar
  24. Dede, Y. (2013).Examining the Underlying Values of Turkish and German Mathematics Teachers’ Decision Making Processes in Group Studies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(1), 670–706.Google Scholar
  25. Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects (4th ed.). Mc Graw Hill, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  26. Dretske, F. (1995). Mental events as structuring causes of behavior. In J. Heil & A. Meele (Eds.), Mental causation (pp. 122–123). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  27. Durmuş, S. & Bıçak, B. (2006). A scale for mathematics and mathematical values of pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics (ICTM 3), Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  28. Ernest, P. (1995). Values, gender and images of mathematics: A philosophical perspective. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 26(3), 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ernest, P. (1998). Images of mathematics, values, and gender: A philosophical perspective. In C. Keitel (Ed.), Social justice and mathematics education (pp. 45–58). Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2: 249–256.Google Scholar
  30. Ernest, P. (2007). The philosophy of mathematics, values and Keralese mathematics. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 4(2), 174–187.Google Scholar
  31. Ernest, P. (2008). Epistemology plus values equals classroom image of mathematics. The Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 23, 12.Google Scholar
  32. Ertmer, P. A., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Ross, E. M. (2001). Technology-using teachers: Comparing perceptions of exemplary technology use to best practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. Available online at http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Publications/JRTE/Issues/Volume331/Number5Summer2001/jrce-33-5-ertmer.pdf.
  33. Fasheh, M. (1982). Mathematics, culture, and authority. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 2–8.Google Scholar
  34. Field, A. (2002). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. FitzSimons, G., Seah, W., Bishop, A. J. & Clarkson, P. (2001). Beyond numeracy: Values in the mathematics classroom. 24th Annual MERGA Conference, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  36. Frade, C. & Machado, M. C (2008). Culture and affect: Influences of the teachers’ values on students’ affect. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 32 and PME-NA XXX, (vol. 3, pp. 33–40), Morelia, Mexico.Google Scholar
  37. Gellert, U. (2000). Mathematics instruction in safe space: Prospective elementary teachers’ views of mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(3), 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gravetter, F. J. & Forzano, L. B. (2008). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Cengage.Google Scholar
  39. Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U. & Törner, G. (1998). Einstellungen gegenüber Mathematik bei Mathematiklehrern. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 19(1), 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gudmunsdottir, S. (1991). Values in pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hill, B. V. (1991). Values education in Australian schools. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  42. Hofstede, G. (2009). Geert Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Retrieved November 25, 2011 from http://www.geert-hofstede.com/hofstedegermany.shtml
  43. Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Howard, P., Perry, B. & Lindsay, M. (1997). Secondary mathematics teachers beliefs about the learning and teaching of mathematics. In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.), People in mathematics education (pp. 231–238). NZ: Rotorua.Google Scholar
  45. Jaccard, J. & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Kaiser, G. (2006). The mathematical beliefs of teachers about applications and modelling-results of an empirical study. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká & N. Stehlíková (Hrsg.). Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the Int. Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME), (vol. 3, pp. 393–400). Prague: Charles University.Google Scholar
  47. Lancaster, D. L. (2006). Values in mathematics. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/resources/LeighLancasterValuesmaths.pdf. Accessed 23 August 2008.
  48. Leder, G. C. & Forgasz, H. J. (2002). Measuring mathematical beliefs and their impact on the learning of mathematics: A new approach. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics educations? (pp. 95–113). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee, W. O. (2001). Moral perspectives on values, culture and education. In J. Cairns, D. Lawton & R. Gardner (Eds.), Values, culture and education (pp. 27–45). London: Kogan.Google Scholar
  50. Leu, Y. C. & Wu, C. J. (2000). An elementary teacher’s pedagogical values in mathematics: Clarification and change. In W. S. Horng & F.-L. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of the HPM 2000 Conference: History in mathematics education: Challenges for a new millennium (Vol. 2, pp. 178–195). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.Google Scholar
  51. Lin, F. C., Wang, C. Y., Chin, C. & Chang, G. Y. (2006). Why student teachers teach or do not teach the professed values? In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME 30) (Vol. 4, pp. 81–88). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.Google Scholar
  52. Maass, K. (2009). What are teacher’s beliefs about effective mathematics teaching? A qualitative study of secondary school teachers in germany. In J. Cai, G. Kaiser, B. Perry & N. Y. Wong (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives. National and cross-national studies. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  53. Ocean, J. (2005). Who cares?: Students’ values and the mathematics curriculum. Curriculum Matters, 1, 130–151.Google Scholar
  54. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual. New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Perry, B., Howard, P. & Tracey, D. (1999). Head mathematics teachers’ beliefs about the learning and teaching of mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 11, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Perry, B., Wong, N. Y., & Howard, P. (2006). Comparing primary and secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, mathematics learning and mathematics teaching in Hong Kong and Australia. In K. D. Graf, F. K. S. Leung, & F. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 435–448). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  58. Rahmenlehrplan für die Gymnasiale Oberstufe [RGO]. (2006). Berlin. Wissenschaft und Technik Verlag. GermanyGoogle Scholar
  59. Rahmenlehrplan für die Sekundarstufe-I [RSS]. (2006). Berlin. Wissenschaft und Technik Verlag. GermanyGoogle Scholar
  60. Rahmenplan Grundschule Mathematik [RGM]. (2004). Berlin. Wissenschaft und Technik Verlag. GermanyGoogle Scholar
  61. Rattray, J. & Jones, M. C. (2007). Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 234–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  63. Rosnow, R. L. & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Beginning behavioral research: A conceptual primer (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  64. Sam, L. C. (2003). Cultural differences and mathematics learning in Malaysia. The Mathematics Educator, 7(1), 110–122.Google Scholar
  65. Sam, L. C. & Ernest, P. (1997). Values in mathematics education: What is planned and what is espoused? Paper presented at the Conference of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, Nottingham, U.K.Google Scholar
  66. Seah, W. T. (2002). Exploring teacher clarification of values relating to mathematics education. In C. Vale, J. Roumeliotis & J. Horwood (Eds.), Valuing mathematics in society (pp. 93–104). Brunswick, Australia: Mathematical Association of Victoria.Google Scholar
  67. Seah, W. T. (2003). The professional socialisation of teachers in transition: A values perspective. International Education Research Conference AARE-NZARE, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  68. Seah, W. T. (2008). Valuing values in mathematics education. In P. Clarkson & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Critical issues in mathematics education: Major contributions of Alan Bishop (pp. 239–252). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Seah, W. T. (2011). Study 3 What I find important (in maths learning): Discussion paper. Unpublished manuscript. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  70. Seah, W. T. & Bishop, A. J. (1999). Realizing a mathematics education for nation-building in Southeast Asia in the new millennium [CD-ROM]. In S. P. Loo (Ed.), Proceedings of the MERA-ERA Joint Conference (vol. 3, pp. 1241–1249). Malaysia and Singapore: Malaysian Educational Research Association and Educational Research Association Singapore.Google Scholar
  71. Seah, W. T. & Bishop, A. J. (2000). Values in mathematics textbooks: A view through two Australasian regions. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  72. Seah, W. T. & Bishop, A. J. (2002). Values, mathematics and society: Making the connections. In C. Vale, J. Roumeliotis & J. Horwood (Eds.), Valuing mathematics in society (pp. 105–113). Brunswick, Australia: Mathematical Association of Victoria.Google Scholar
  73. Seah, W. T. & Peng, A. (2012). What students outside Asia value in effective mathematics lessons: A scoping study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stigler, J. W. & Perry, M. (1988). Cross cultural studies of mathematics teaching and learning: recent findings and new directions. In D. A. Grouws & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching (pp. 194–223.). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  75. Swadener, M. & Soedjadi, R. (1988). Values, mathematics education and the task of developing pupils’ personalities: An Indonesian perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(2), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  77. Törner, G. (1997). Views of German mathematics teachers on mathematics. In J. A. Dossey & J. O. Swafford, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education at Illinois University Bloomington/Normal (vol. I, pp. 275–281). Columbus (OH): ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.Google Scholar
  78. Van Slyke, J. A. (2011). The cognitive science of religion. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  79. Vickers, A. (1999). Comparison of an ordinal and a continuous outcome measure of muscle soreness. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 15, 709–716.Google Scholar
  80. Wang, C.Y., Lin, F.-C., Chin, C. & Chang, G.Y. (2006). Re-examining the category framework for describing mathematics teachers’ values. Paper presented at the Taiwan 2006 Annual Conference of Educational Research, Hwa-Lien: National Hwa-Lien University of Education.Google Scholar
  81. Wilson, M. S. & Cooney, T. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development: The role of beliefs. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 127–148). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  82. Yero, J. L. (2002). Teaching in mind: How teacher thinking shapes education. Hamilton, MT: MindFlight.Google Scholar
  83. Yore, L. D., Pimm, D. & Tuan, H.-L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations