• Sungmin ImEmail author
  • Ok-Ja Kim


For over two decades, there has been increasing concern regarding the science learning of disadvantaged students such as indigenous or disabled students. The academic achievement of students with hearing impairment has been seen as relatively low. This low achievement has been mainly due to students’ poor literal ability and not because of their low intellectual ability. Interactive experiences and the repeated use of previously learned terms have been suggested as being important to improve their literacy. In addition, it is well recognized that for all students to experience success in science education, literacy needs to be considered as a crucial factor when setting educational goals among students with limited language proficiency. This study presents a strategy for teaching science to students with limited language proficiency based on a teaching strategy which deliberately focuses on written expression in the context of hands-on scientific activities. The influence of this teaching strategy upon hearing impaired students’ language proficiency and inquiry skills was also examined. Results revealed the students’ language proficiency was enhanced in terms of fluency of expression, and their inquiry skills were also improved as compared to the students in a control group among whom the teaching strategy was not used. These results demonstrated that this teaching strategy which focuses on students’ written expression and inquiry skills through scientific activity can improve the literacy of students with limited language proficiency as well as increase their learning success in science.


hearing impairment inquiry skill language proficiency 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bay, M., Staver, J. R., Bryan, T. & Hale, J. B. (1992). Science instruction for the mildly handicapped: Direct instruction versus discovery teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 355–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braden, B. A. (1992). Intellectual assessment of deaf and hard of hearing people: A quantitative and qualitative research synthesis. School Psychology Review, 21, 82–94.Google Scholar
  3. Chang, M.-D., Cheong, C. & Cheong, J.-W. (1999). The relation between reading ability, inquiry skill and achievement of elementary school students. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 20(2), 137–142.Google Scholar
  4. Choi, S.-K. (2007). Vygotsky’s view and contribution on bicultural and bilingual approach for the hearing impaired. The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, 8(4), 633–653.Google Scholar
  5. Groht, M. A. (1958). Natural language for deaf children. Washington, D. C.: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.Google Scholar
  6. Kim, B.-H. & Choi, Y.-J. (1990). An analysis of literacy of hearing impaired students. Communication Disorder, 13(2), 5–26.Google Scholar
  7. Kincheloe, J. (2005). Critical constructivism. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  8. Kincheloe, J. & Tobin, K. (2006). Doing educational research in a complex world. In K. Tobin & J. Kincheloe (Eds.), Doing educational research: A handbook. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Kuder, S. J. (2003). Teaching students with language and communication disabilities (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Kwon, Y.-H. (1989). A study on literal education for the deaf students. Seoul: The Kumok Foundation of Academy.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, O. (2001). Culture and language in science education: What do we know and what do we need to know? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 499–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, Y. (2004). Science seen by mind. Seoul: Gyoyuk-gwahaksa.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, P.-S. & Shin, S.-J. (2003). The effect of whole language program on the language development of hearing impaired children. Communication Disorder, 26(2), 3–31.Google Scholar
  14. MacDogall, A., Schnur, R., Berger, C. & Vernon, D. (1981). The use of activity-centered science activities to facilitate the mainstreaming of elementary school children with special needs. Science Education, 65(5), 467–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mastropieri, M. A. & Scruggs, T. E. (1992). Science for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 62(4), 377–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E. & Magnusen, M. (1999). Activities-oriented science instruction for students with disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 240–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pak, S.-J. (2001). Physics education in cultural context: Issues, approaches, and perspectives. In Y. Park (Ed.), Teaching and learning of physics in cultural contexts. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  18. Park, H. (2000). A study on assessment of scientific inquiry skill of students with hearing impairment. Master’s thesis, Kookmin University.Google Scholar
  19. Reveles, J. M., Cordova, R. & Kelly, G. J. (2004). Science literacy and academic identity formulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1111–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Bakken, J. P. & Brighan, F. F. (1993). Reading versus doing: The relative effects of textbook-based and inquiry-oriented approaches to science learning in special education classrooms. The Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seiler, G. & Elemsky, R. (2005). The who, what, where, and how of our urban ethnographic research. In K. Tobin, R. Elemsky & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students, and researchers. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Tobin, K. (2005). Urban science as a culturally and socially adaptive practice. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  23. Toriyama, Y. (2006). Proceedings of international seminar on science education for the less represented students. Gyeongsan: Daegu University.Google Scholar
  24. Vang, C. T. (2005). Minority students are far from academic success and still at-risk in public schools. Multicultural Education, 12(4), 9–15.Google Scholar
  25. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Wellington, J. & Ireson, G. (2008). Science learning, science teaching. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Wong, D. (2001). Perspectives on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 279–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science EducationDaegu UniversityGyeongsanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations