• Noemi WaightEmail author


In-depth interviews guided by video elicitations examined 30 high school science teachers’ conceptions of technology and by extension how these conceptions reflected dimensions of nature of technology. Altogether, 64 % of the teachers characterized their schools and departments as aggressive–moderate adopters with generous access and support for technological tools. In comparison, 30 % noted that their school lagged behind due to funding and lack of infrastructure. Definitions of technology revealed emphasis on technology as artifact, overwhelming optimism on the purpose and function of technology to improve and make life easier and as representation of advancement in civilization. In tandem, teachers were most drawn to two video scenarios—medical and everyday tool videos because it reflected notions of progression and expectations of future changes; heightened awareness of the multitude of available technologies; and perceived relevance with classroom content. Perhaps most telling in these findings was that few teachers were drawn to the classroom video scenario, and only three teachers highlighted the technology–science–school science connection. These findings have implications for holistic understandings of technologies, which may inform how science teachers perceive and enact technologies in their science classrooms.

Key words

nature of technology science education teacher conceptions technological tools 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10763_2013_9452_MOESM1_ESM.docx (114 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 114 kb)


  1. Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Audet, R. & Abegg, G. (1996). Geographic information systems: Implications for problem solving. Journal of Geography, 33, 21–45.Google Scholar
  3. Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International journal of science education, 22, 665–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basalla, G. (1996). The evolution of technology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, P., Hoadley, C. M. & Linn, M. C. (2004). Design-based research in education. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 3–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Bryson, M. & de Castell, S. (1998). New technologies and the cultural ecology of primary schooling: Imagining teachers as luddites in/deed. Educational Policy, 12, 542–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang, H., Quintana, C. & Krajcik, J. S. (2009). The impact of designing and evaluating molecular animations on how well middle school students understand the particulate nature of matter. Science Education, 94, 73–94.Google Scholar
  8. Christians, C. (1989). A theory of normative technology. In E. F. Byrne & J. C. Pitt (Eds.), Technological transformation: Contextual and conceptual implications (pp. 123–139). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Czerniak, C. M., Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J. & Beck, J. (1999). Teachers’ beliefs about using educational technology in the science classroom. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1, 1–17.Google Scholar
  11. DeVaney, A. (1998). Will educators ever unmask that determiner, technology? Educational Policy, 12, 568–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ebenezer, J., Kaya, O. N. & Ebenezer, D. L. (2011). Engaging students in environmental research projects: Perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Canada: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  14. Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Progressive inquiry in a computer-supported biology class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1072–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures. A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  18. Kikas, E. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions and misconceptions concerning three natural phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 432–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koballa, T. R., Glynn, S. M., Upson, L. & Coleman, D. C. (2005). Conceptions of teaching science held by novice teachers in an alternative certification program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koballa, T., Graber, W., Coleman, D. C. & Kemp, A. C. (2000). Prospective gymnasium teachers’ conceptions of chemistry learning and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educator (pp. 3–29). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Lan, Y. L. (2012). Development of an attitude scale to assess K–12 teachers’ attitudes toward nanotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1189–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leatham, K. R. (2007). Pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about the nature of technology in the classroom. Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7, 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S. & Bonner, J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1318–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mathewson, J. H. (2005). The visual core of science: Definition and applications to education. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McDonald, S. & Songer, N. B. (2008). Enacting classroom inquiry: Theorizing teachers’ conceptions of science teaching. Science Education, 92, 973–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Research Council (2011). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  29. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ng, W. & Gunstone, R. (2003). Science and computer-based technologies: Attitudes of secondary science teachers. Research in Science & Technology Education, 21, 243–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Odom, A. L., Settlage, J. & Pedersen, J. E. (2002). Technology knowledge and use: A survey of science educators. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pacey, A. (1983). The culture of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pedersen, J. E. & Yerrick, R. K. (2000). Technology in science teacher education: Survey of current uses and desired knowledge among science educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 131–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H. & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation and design. Educational Researcher, 40, 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Radder, H. (2008). Critical philosophy of technology: The basic issues. Social Epistemology, 22, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Russell, D. W., Lucas, K. B. & McRobbie, C. J. (2004). Role of the microcomputer-based laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understandings in thermal physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, L. K. & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms?: Elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 396–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Squire, K. D., MaKinster, J. G., Barnett, M., Luehmann, A. L. & Barab, S. L. (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87, 468–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tao, P.-K. L. & Gunstone, R. (1999). The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported physics instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 859–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tenner, E. (1996). Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. New York: First Vintage Books Edition.Google Scholar
  41. Volti, R. (2010). Society and technological change. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2007). The Impact of technology on the enactment of inquiry in a technology enthusiast’s sixth grade science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 154–182.Google Scholar
  43. Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of technology: Implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 2875–2905.Google Scholar
  44. Wang, Y. (2002). From teacher-centredness to student-centredness: Are preservice teachers making the conceptual shift when teaching in information age classrooms? Educational Media International, 39, 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wineburg, S., Mosborg, S., Porat, D. & Duncan (2007). Common belief and the cultural curriculum: An intergenerational study of historical consciousness. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 40–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yerrick, R. & Hoving, T. (1999). Obstacles confronting technology initiatives as seen through the experience of science teachers: A comparative study of science teachers1 beliefs, planning, and practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zacharia, Z. (2003). Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 792–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations