• Makomosela QhobelaEmail author
  • Eunice Kolitsoe Moru


The classroom practices of science teachers are indicative of their beliefs and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). PCK is an amalgam of knowledge about subject matter, pedagogy, and contextual issues. This article identifies areas where physics teachers in Lesotho may need professional development support by addressing the research question: How do secondary school physics teachers in Lesotho describe the teaching of science and their actual practice? A mixed-methods approach involving a survey and follow-up interviews of secondary school physics teachers was used to collect information about this research question. The results show that there is a disjuncture between the teachers’ pedagogic knowledge and the teachers’ contextual knowledge, indicating that their PCK was not well formed and could serve as a central focus for their professional development.

Key words

classroom practices pedagogical content knowledge physics teachers teachers’ beliefs 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An, S., Kulm, G. & Wu, Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school, mathematics teachers in China and the U.S. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, S. E. & Nieswandt, M. (2010). Teaching about ethics through socioscientific issues in physics and chemistry: Teacher candidates’ beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 380–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyle, B., While, D. & Boyle, T. (2004). A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? The Curriculum Journal, 15(1), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brodie, K., Lelliott, A. & Davis, H. (2002). Forms and substance in learner-centred teaching: Teachers’ take-up from an in-service programme in South Africa. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 541–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryan, L. A. (2012). Research on science teachers’ beliefs. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 477–495). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, E. A. & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnston, J. & Ahtee, M. (2006). Comparing primary student teachers’ attitudes, subject knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge needs in a physics activity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 503–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones, A. & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones, G. & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067–1104). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Kahn, M. & Rollnick, M. (1993). Science education in the new South Africa: Reflections and visions. International Journal of Science Education, 15(3), 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khoboli, B. & Malcolm, C. (2004). Science teachers’ views of learner centered education in Lesotho. In A. Buffer & R. C. Laugksch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12 th annual conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 474–479). Durban: SAARMSTE.Google Scholar
  13. Lavonen, K., & Krzywacki, H. (2012). Teacher education in Finland: Knowledge building in the chemistry and physics teacher education programme at Helsinki University. Accessed 14 May 2013
  14. Leedy, P. D. & Ormorod, J. E. (2005). Practical research: Planning and design (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and value. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  16. Lerotholi, L. M. (2001). Tuition fees in primary and secondary education in Lesotho: The levels and implications for access, equity and efficiency. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning (UNESCO).Google Scholar
  17. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N. & Stiles, K. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
  18. Loughran, J. J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (Eds.). (2012). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (2nd ed.). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  19. Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J. & Czerniak, C. M. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J. S. & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 35–133). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  21. Maqutu, T. (2003). Explaining success in O-level physical science in Lesotho: A survey of physical science teachers. African Journal of Research in SMT Education, 7, 97–107.Google Scholar
  22. Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2013). Improving PCK of chemical equilibrium in pre-service teachers. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 17 (1–2), 113–125.Google Scholar
  23. Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. & Akkoç, H. (2009). Preservice teachers’ instructional beliefs and examination of consistency between beliefs and practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 1173–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pedersen, S. & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Qhobela, M. & Moru, E. K. (2011). Teaching argumentation in learning physics at secondary school level in Lesotho: A feasible teaching strategy. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2), 97–111.Google Scholar
  27. Seung, E. (2012). The process of physics teaching assistants’ pedagogical content knowledge development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi: 10.1007/s10763-012-9378-4. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
  28. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Siorenta, A. & Jimoyiannis, A. (2008). Physics instruction in secondary schools: An investigation of teachers’ beliefs towards physics laboratory and ICT. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(2), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. van Driel, J. H., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K. & Zwart, R. C. (2012). Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: A review of design features and quality of research. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 129–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N. & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wallace, C. S. & Kang, N. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yore, L. D., Henriques, L., Crawford, B., Smith, L., Gomez-Zwiep, S. & Tillotson, J. (2007). Selecting and using inquiry approaches to teach science: The influence of context in elementary, middle, and secondary schools. In E. Abrams, S. A. Sutherland & P. Silva (Eds.), Inquiry in the classroom: Realities and opportunities (pp. 39–87). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science EducationNational University of LesothoLesothoSouthern Africa

Personalised recommendations