• Lydia Kyei-BlanksonEmail author


In this mixed-methods study, the effect of training teacher–researchers in a collaborative research environment is examined for a cohort of teachers enrolled in a Math and Science Partnership (MSP) master’s degree program. The teachers describe changes in their research views and in their application of research in practice, and detail the challenges they faced during the process. The findings of the study suggest training teachers as researchers is likely to encourage teacher interest in conducting and applying theory in math and science classrooms. The results of this study have implications for bridging the gap between theory and practice in math and science education in general.


collaborative action research math education science education teacher–researcher 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Benson, R., Samarawickrema, G. & O’Connell, M. (2009). Participatory evaluation: Implications for improving electronic learning and teaching approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(6), 709–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernent, A. (2007). Bridging the sciences 2007 luncheon remarks. Retrieved from Accessed 22 Mar 2009.
  3. Bonne, L., Pritchard, R., et al. (2007). Teachers developing as researchers: Teachers investigate their use of questions in mathematics. Retrieved from
  4. Burnaford, G. & Hilsabeck, A. (2000). The Masters project: Negotiating identities as teacher researchers. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association national conference. New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  5. Burns, A. (2005). Action research: An evolving paradigm? Language Teaching, 38, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  7. Everett, S. A., Luera, G. R. & Otto, C. A. (2006). Pre-service elementary teachers bridge the gap between research and practice. International Journal of Science and Math Education, 6, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strength and sustain teaching. Teacher College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N. & Hyun, H. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Furlong, J. & Salisbury, J. (2005). Best practice research scholarships: An evaluation. Research Papers in Education, 20(1), 45–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gewirtz, S., Shapiro, J., Maguire, M., Mahony, P. & Cribb, A. (2009). Doing teacher research: A qualitative analysis of purposes, processes and experiences. Educational Action Research, 17(4), 567–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gould, P. (2005). From the hill to the swamp: Combining research and practice. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Math Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 50–53). Melbourne: Math Education Research Group of Australasia.Google Scholar
  13. Green, S. B. & Salkind, N. J. (2010). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Guskey, T. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hahs-Vaughn, D. L. & Yanowitz, K. L. (2009). Who is conducting teacher research? The Journal of Educational Research, 102(6), 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halai, N. (2012). Developing understanding of innovative strategies of teaching science through action research: A qualitative meta-synthesis from Pakistan. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 10(2), 387–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hendricks, C. (1970). Improving schools through action research: A comprehensive guide for educators. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Huber, C. H. & Savage, T. A. (2009). Promoting research as a core value in master’s-level counselor education. Counselor Education & Supervision, 48, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, R. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118, 282–292.Google Scholar
  20. Kemmis, J. (2009). Action research as practice-based practice. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1982) The action research planner. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Keys, C. W. & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levin, B. B. & Rock, T. C. (2003). The effects of collaborative action research on preservice and experienced teacher partners in professional development school. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGee, A. (2008). Critical reflections of action research used for professional development in Middle Eastern Gulf State. Educational Action Research, 16(2), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McTaggart, R. (1991). Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Merrill, C. & Daughtery, J. (2010). STEM education and leadership: A mathematics and science partnership approach. Journal of Technology Education, 21(2), 21–34.Google Scholar
  28. Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A guide to the teacher researcher (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Mitchell, S. N., Reilly, R. C. & Logue, M. E. (2009). Benefits of collaborative action research for the beginning teacher. Teaching and Teacher, 25, 344–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muirhead, B. (2002). Teacher-as-researcher. USDLA Journal, 16(9), 23–25.Google Scholar
  31. Neilsen, E. H. (2006). But let’s not forget John Collier. Action Research, 4(4), 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peters, J. M. (2002). Action research: An approach called DATA-DATA. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. Chattanooga, TN.Google Scholar
  33. Postholm, M. B. (2009). Research and development work: Developing teachers as researchers or just teachers? Educational Action Research, 17(4), 551–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Price, J. N. (2001). Action research, pedagogy, and change: The transformative potential of action research in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Savin-Baden, M. & Wimpenny, K. (2007). Exploring and implementing participatory action research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, K. & Sela, O. (2005). Action research as a bridge between pre-service teacher education and in-service professional development for students and teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sowa, P. (2009). Understanding our learners and developing reflective practice: Conducting action research in English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1026–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stenhouse, L. (1981). What counts as research? British Journal of Educational Studies, 29, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stigler, J. W. & Hiebert, J. (2009). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. van Zee, E. (2006). Teacher research: Exploring student thinking and learning. Science Educator, 15(1), 29–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Illinois State UniversityNormalUSA

Personalised recommendations