Advertisement

ASSESSING CHEMISTRY-LEARNING COMPETENCIES OF STUDENTS IN ISOLATED RURAL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS BY USING THE NATIONAL EXAMINATION: A CASE STUDY OF SIMEULUE ISLAND, INDONESIA

  • M- Adlim
  • Soewarno S
  • Hasbi Ali
  • Armia Ibrahim
  • Hasmunir Umar
  • Khairil Ismail
  • Usman A. Gani
  • Ishak Hasan
  • Burhanuddin Yasin
Article

ABSTRACT

This study explored learning competency based on the Indonesian National Examination focusing especially on chemistry performance and the circumstances of senior high school students and teachers in rural areas of Simeulue Island, Indonesia. The National Examination total score and chemistry score for students in rural areas were consistently lower than students in urban areas during 2008–2010. The majority of rural students were failing to master key chemistry concepts. Their low performance on laboratory-based questions appeared to indicate that the associated practical work was not done as part of the chemistry courses. Some chemistry topics were not taught due to insufficient time, student weaknesses, insufficient textbooks, and other reasons. The issues of low competency of teachers, poverty for the majority of students, low enrollment in schools, and low competition among students in these rural senior high schools appeared to be common problems across rural settings. The local government has recommended providing a consolidated rural high school with qualified chemistry teachers, laboratories, and transportation to address factors negatively influencing student achievement. Furthermore, local rural school officials need to recruit and retain qualified teachers in these isolated areas, provide effective textbooks and instructional resources, and facilitate the professional development of chemistry teachers.

KEY WORDS

chemistry achievement Indonesia national examinations rural isolated schools 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, R., & Chang, B. (2011). Mathematics course-taking in rural high schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(1). Retrieved from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/26-1.pdf. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  2. Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 493–535). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Barley, Z.A., & Wegner, S. (2010). An examination of the provision of supplemental educational services in nine rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 25(5). Retrieved from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/25-5.pdf. Retrieved June 2, 2012.
  4. Beck, F. D., & Shoffstall, G. W. (2005). How do rural schools fare under a high-stakes testing regime? Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(14). Retrieved from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/20-14.pdf. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  5. Boekaerts, M. (2002). Motivation to learn. (Education Practices Series-10). Brussels & Geneva: International Academy of Education & International Bureau of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/archive/publications/EducationalPracticesSeriesPdf/prac10e.pdf. Retrieved June 18, 2012.
  6. BSNP [National education standards agency] (2013). Standard Kompetensi dan Kompetensi Dasar, SMA-MA, Kimia [Standard framework for chemistry learning in senior high school]. Jakarta, Indonesia: Author. Available from http://bsnp-indonesia.org/id/?page_id=103/. Retrieved June 12, 2012.
  7. Campbell, A.M., & Yates, G. C. R. (2011). Want to be a country teacher? No, I am too metrocentric. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(4). Retrieved from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/26-4.pdf. Retrieved June 5, 2012.
  8. Duit, R. H. & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Conceptual change: Still a powerful framework for improving the practice of science instruction. In K. C. D. Tan, M. Kim & S. Hwang (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research: Moving forward (pp. 43–54). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Firman, H. & Tola, B. (2008). The future of schooling in Indonesia, CICE Hiroshima University. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 11, 71–84.Google Scholar
  10. Flora, C. B., Flora, J. L. & Fey, S. (2003). Rural communities: Legacy and change (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hammer, P. C., Hughes, G., McClure, C., Reeves, C. & Salgado, D. (2005). Rural teacher recruitment and retention practices: A review of the research literature, national survey of rural superintendents, and case studies of programs in Virginia. Charleston, WV: Edvantia.Google Scholar
  12. Holbrook, J. (2005). Making chemistry teaching relevant. Chemical Education International, 6, 1–12.Google Scholar
  13. Jansoon, N., Coll, R. K. & Samsook, E. (2009). Understanding mental models of dilution in Thai students. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4, 147–168.Google Scholar
  14. King, D., Bellocchi, A. & Ritchie, S. M. (2008). Making connections: Learning and teaching chemistry in context. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lam, S.-F., Yim, P.-S., Law, J. S. F. & Cheung, R. W. Y. (2004). The effects of competition on achievement motivation in Chinese classrooms. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 281–296. doi: 10.1348/000709904773839888. Retrieved June 12, 2012.Google Scholar
  16. Lopes, J. B., Branco, J. & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2011). ‘Learning Experience’ provided by science teaching practice in a classroom and the development of students’ competences. Research in Science Education, 41(5), 787–809. doi: 10.1007/s11165-010-9190-5. Retrieved June 12 2012.
  17. Mata Elang Media (2011). Peringkat 1, UN SMA/MA IPA 2012 [Ranking 1, National Examination for Senior High School in Science Subjects 2012]. Jakarta, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Milner, A. R., Templin, M. A. & Czerniak, C. M. (2011). Elementary science students’ motivation and learning strategy use: Constructivist classroom contextual factors in a life science laboratory and a traditional classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 151–170. doi: 10.1007/s10972-010-9200-5. Retrieved June 12, 2012.Google Scholar
  19. Mulkeen, A. & Chen, D. (Eds.). (2008). Teachers for rural schools, experiences in Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  20. NationMaster.com (2011). Southeast Asia, Indonesia, Education. Retrieved from http://www.nationmaster.com/country/id-indonesia/edu-education. Retrieved June 12, 2012.
  21. Panizzon, D. (2012). Science education in rural settings: Exploring the ‘state of play’ internationally. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 527–539). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_36. Retrieved June 6, 2012.
  22. Reeves, E. B. & Bylund, R. A. (2005). Are rural schools inferior to urban schools? Amulti level analysis of school accountability trends in Kentucky. Rural Sociology, 70, 360–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roehrig, G. H. & Luft, J. A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roscigno, V. J., Tomaskovic-Deyey & Crowley, M. (2006). Education and the inequalities place. Social Forces, 84, 2121–2145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Seehan, M. (2010). Identification of difficult topics in teaching and learning of chemistry in Irish schools and the development of an intervention programme to target some of these difficulties. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Limerick Ollscoil Luimnigh, Limerick, Ireland.Google Scholar
  26. Singh, P., Rahman, A. A. & Hoon, T. S. (2010). Languages and mathematics achievements among rural and urban primary four pupils: A Malaysian experience. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33, 65–85.Google Scholar
  27. Singh, S., Singh, A. & Singh, R. K. (2011). Academic motivation among urban and rural students: A study on traditional vs. open education system in India. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-Tojde, 12, 133–146. Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde45/pdf/Volume12Number4.pdf. Retrieved June 18, 2012.
  28. Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4, 1–20.Google Scholar
  29. Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet”. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 179–195. doi: 10.1080/09500690903386435. Retrieved June 12, 2012.
  30. United States National Research Council (2012). In H. Quinn, H. A. Schweingruber & T. Keller (Eds.), A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  31. Voicu, B. & Vasile, M. (2010). Rural–urban inequalities and expansion of tertiary education in Romania. Journal of Social Research and Policy, 1, 5–24.Google Scholar
  32. Zulfikar, T. (2009). The making of Indonesian education: An overview on empowering Indonesian teachers. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 2, 13–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • M- Adlim
    • 1
  • Soewarno S
    • 1
  • Hasbi Ali
    • 1
  • Armia Ibrahim
    • 1
  • Hasmunir Umar
    • 1
  • Khairil Ismail
    • 1
  • Usman A. Gani
    • 1
  • Ishak Hasan
    • 1
  • Burhanuddin Yasin
    • 1
  1. 1.FKIP Syiah Kuala UniversityBanda AcehIndonesia

Personalised recommendations