Advertisement

HOW MULTIMODALITY WORKS IN MATHEMATICAL ACTIVITY: YOUNG CHILDREN GRAPHING MOTION

  • Francesca FerraraEmail author
Article

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to contribute to discussions on the multimodal nature of cognition through an elaboration of the ways multimodal aspects of thinking are exploited by learners doing mathematics. Moving beyond the fact that multimodality occurs, this paper focuses on how it occurs, with particular attention drawn to the complex network of perceptual, bodily and imaginary experiences of students. Through an analysis of 2 selected episodes of the work of 1 primary school child learning to graph motion, the paper shows how the notion of blending spaces is central to understanding the mechanism of multimodality.

KEY WORDS

graphing motion imagination multimodality perceptuo–motor activity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainley, J. (2000). Transparency in graphs and graphing tasks: An iterative design process. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O. & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burbules, N. C. (2006). Rethinking the virtual. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan, J. Hunsinger & P. Trifonas (Eds.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments (pp. 37–58). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307–333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. de Freitas, E. & Sinclair, N. (2012). Diagram, gesture, agency: Theorizing embodiment in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 133–152.Google Scholar
  6. diSessa, A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B. & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117–160.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, C. H. (1979). The historical development of the calculus. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferrara, F. (2006). Remembering and imagining: Moving back and forth between motion and its representation. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká & N. Stehlíková (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 3, pp. 65–72). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University, Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
  9. Gallese, V. & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 455–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kress, G. (2004). Reading images: Multimodality, representation and new media. Information Design Journal, 12(2), 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lakoff, G. & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. McNeill, D. (Ed.). (2000). Language and gesture: Window into thought and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Three conjectures concerning the relationship between body activity and understanding Mathematics. In N.A. Pateman, B.J. Dougherty, & J.T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 1, pp. 105–109). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
  15. Nemirovsky, R. & Ferrara, F. (2009). Mathematical imagination and embodied cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nemirovsky, R., Rasmussen, C., Sweeney, G. & Wawro, M. (2012). When the classroom floor becomes the complex plane: Addition and multiplication as ways of bodily navigation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nemirovsky, R., Tierney, C. & Wright, T. (1998). Body motion and graphing. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 119–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Radford, L., Edwards, L. & Arzarello, F. (2009). Beyond words. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. (1997). The space around us. Science, 277, 190–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roth, W. M. (2009). Bodily experience and mathematical conceptions: From classical views to a phenomenological reconceptualization. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rotman, B. (2008). Becoming beside ourselves: The alphabet, ghosts, and distributed human beings. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schiralli, M. & Sinclair, N. (2003). A constructive response to ‘where mathematics comes from’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(1), 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seitz, J. A. (2000). The bodily basis of thought, new ideas in psychology. An International Journal of Innovative Theory in Psychology, 18(1), 23–40.Google Scholar
  25. Sinclair, N. & Armstrong, A. (2011). A geometric approach to story graphs and piecewise linear functions. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 16(6), 347–353.Google Scholar
  26. Sinclair, N., de Freitas, E. & Ferrara, F. (2013). Virtual encounters: The murky and furtive world of mathematical inventiveness. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Streeck, J. & Mehus, S. (2005). Microethnography: The study of practices. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 381–404). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Matematica “Giuseppe Peano”Università di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations