Abstract
This study combines the Japanese lesson study approach and mathematics teachers’ professional development. The first year of a 4-year project in which 3 Dutch secondary school teachers worked cooperatively on introducing making sense of the calculus is reported. The analysis focusses on instrumental and relational student understanding of mathematical concepts and the transition between the conceptual embodiment and the operational symbolism of the calculus. This paper reports on 2 cycles of lesson studies that took place in the first project year, the first cycle focussing on the notion of the derivative (introduced for polynomials) and the second on trigonometry (as the concepts shift from ratios in a right-angled triangle to functions in the calculus). The lesson study cycles resulted in changes in the teachers’ educational goals and instructional strategies in relation to student understanding. However, the teachers’ desire to be good teachers, their perceived need to prepare students for standard examinations and their reluctance to use computers impeded their progress in developing a lesson study approach. The introduction of a Japanese lesson study approach into a Dutch context merits further reflection in the later years of the project.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ambrose, R., Clement, L., Philipp, R. & Chauvot, J. (2004). Assessing prospective elementary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and mathematics learning: Rationale and development of a constructed-response-format beliefs survey. School Science and Mathematics, 104(2), 56–59.
Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understanding that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90, 499–466.
Ball, D. L. (1991). Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about subject matter? In M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners (pp. 63–83). New York: Teachers College Press.
Baumert, J. & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(4), 469–520.
Blackett, N., & Tall, D. (1991). Gender and the versatile learning of trigonometry using computer software. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, 144–151. Assisi, Italy
Borovik, A. & Gardiner, T. (2007). Mathematical abilities and mathematical skills. Manchester: The University of Manchester, MIMS.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D. & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 194–222.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.
Carpenter, T. & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19–32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cerbin, W. & Kopp, B. (2006). Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 250–257.
Davis, R. B. & Vinner, S. (1986). The notion of limit: Some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5(3), 281–303.
Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
Desimone, L. (2011). A primer on effective professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 92, 68–71.
Fernandez, C. & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: CD–B Press/Freudenthal Institute.
Hambleton, R. K. & Pitoniak, M. J. (2006). Setting performance standards. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger Publishers.
Hiebert, J. & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B. & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L. & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
Hohenwarter, M., Hohenwarter, J., Kreis, Y. & Lavicza, Z. (2008). Teaching and learning calculus with free dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra. TSG 16: Research and development in the teaching and learning of calculus, ICME 11, Monterrey, Mexico.
Ingaki, T., Terasaki, M. & Matsudaira, N. (Eds.). (1988). The life course of teachers. Tokyo: Tokaidaigaku Shuppankai.
Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P. & Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3–21.
Jaffe, A. & Quinn, F. (1993). Theoretical mathematics: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 29(1), 1–13.
Johnson, J. D. & Walker, M. (2011). Trigonometry students’ knowing when to use hand-held CAS technology to make sense of mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 17–33.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Krauss, S., Baumert, J. & Blum, W. (2008). Secondary mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge: Validation of the COACTIV constructs. ZDM, 40(5), 873–892.
Levine, T. H. & Marcus, A. S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teachers’ collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 389–398.
Lewis, C. C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
Lewis, C. C., Perry, R. & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14.
Lewis, C. C. (2009). What is the nature of knowledge development in lesson study? Educational Action Research, 17(1), 95–110.
Lewis, C. C. & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Matoba, M., Shibata, Y., Reza, M. & Arani, S. (2007). School-university partnerships: A new recipe for creating professional knowledge in school. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 6(2), 55–65.
Nakatome, T. (1984). Developing konaikenshu: A comprehensive study of management of Japanese konaikesnhu. Tokyo: Eidell Kenkyousho.
Pérez, A. I., Soto, E. & Serván, M. J. (2010). Participatory action research and the reconstruction of teachers’ practical thinking: Lesson studies and core reflection. An experience in Spain. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 73–87.
Puchner, L. D. & Taylor, A. N. (2006). Lesson study, collaboration and teacher efficacy: Stories from two school-based math lesson study groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 922–934.
Ross, J. A., Bruce, C. D. & Sibbald, T. (2011). Sequencing computer-assisted learning of transformations of trigonometric functions. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 30(3), 120–137.
Saito, E., Hawe, P., Hadiprawiroc, S. & Empedhe, S. (2008). Initiating education reform through lesson study at a university in Indonesia. Educational Action Research, 16(3), 391–406.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006). What doesn’t work: The challenge and failure of the what works clearinghouse to conduct meaningful reviews of studies of mathematics curricula. Educational Researcher, 35(2), 13–21.
Sims, L. & Walsh, D. (2009). Lesson study with preservice teachers: Lessons from lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 724–733.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Stepanek, J., Appel, G., Leong, M., Mangan, M. T. & Mitchell, M. (2007). Leading lesson study: A practical guide for teachers and facilitators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Tall, D. O. (2008a). The transition to formal thinking in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 5–24.
Tall, D. O. (2008b). Using Japanese lesson study in teaching mathematics. Scottish Mathematical Council Journal, 38, 45–50.
Tall., D.O. (2010). A sensible approach to the calculus. Plenary at The National and International Meeting on the Teaching of Calculus, Puebla, Mexico.
Thurston, W. P. (1990). On proof and progress in mathematics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30(2), 161–177.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2000). Mathematics Education in The Netherlands: A guided tour. Freudenthal Institute CD-ROM for ICME9. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
Verhoef, N. C., & Tall, D. O. (2011). Lesson study: The effect on teachers’ professional development. Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4, 297–304. Turkey: University of Ankara.
Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S. & Richert, A. E. (1987). ‘150 different ways’ of knowing: Representation of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 104–124). London: Cassell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verhoef, N., Tall, D., Coenders, F. et al. THE COMPLEXITIES OF A LESSON STUDY IN A DUTCH SITUATION: MATHEMATICS TEACHER LEARNING. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 12, 859–881 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9436-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9436-6