PROFILES OF OPPORTUNITIES TO LEARN FOR TEDS-M FUTURE SECONDARY MATHEMATICS TEACHERS
- 313 Downloads
This study used the data set from the Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics to identify the profiles of opportunities to learn (OTL) regarding topics studied in teacher preparation programs by future secondary mathematics teachers from 15 participating countries. The topics of inquiry covered tertiary-level mathematics, school-level mathematics, mathematics education, and general education. Dominating OTL profiles across and within countries were identified and compared with those examined by Blömeke & Kaiser (ZDM 44(3):249–264, 2012) at the primary level. Our results show that, for tertiary-level mathematics, the secondary level demands intensive and extensive coverage of topics, whereas the primary level appears to have a two-peak phenomenon compared to the secondary level. The preparation philosophies in mathematics education are homogeneous at both school levels, although the secondary level placed more emphasis on facilitating students’ cognitive understanding and cultivating students’ mathematical abilities. Regarding general education, two philosophies prevailed at the secondary level: (a) comprehensive coverage or (b) only focusing on the OTL that are related to school practice; however, at the primary level, only the first philosophy prevailed.
Key wordsinternational comparison OTL secondary mathematics teacher education TEDS-M
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Re f erences
- Adler, J. & Davis, Z. (2006). Opening another black box: Researching mathematics for teaching in mathematics teacher education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 270–296.Google Scholar
- Benken, B. M. & Brown, N. (2008). Moving beyond the barriers: A re-defined, multi-leveled partnership approach to mathematics teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 17(2), 63–82.Google Scholar
- Blömeke, S. & Kaiser, G. (2012). Homogeneity or heterogeneity? Profiles of opportunities to learn in primary teacher education and their relationship to cultural context and outcomes. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(3), 249–264. doi: 10.1007/s11858-011-0378-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clark, S. & Muthén, B. (2009). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/relatinglca.pdf.
- Grossman, P. L. (1995). Teachers’ knowledge. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 20–24). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Hsieh, F.-J. (2012). 中學數學職前教師之數學教學知能 [Mathematics teaching competence of future secondary mathematics teachers]. In F.-J. Hsieh (Ed.), 臺灣數學師資培育跨國研究 Taiwan TEDS-M 2008 (pp. 119–142). Taipei: Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University.Google Scholar
- Hsieh, F.-J., Yang, C.-C. & Shy, H.-Y. (2012). 中學數學職前教師在師資培育課程之學習機會 [Opportunities to learn in teacher preparation courses of future secondary mathematics teachers]. In F.-J. Hsieh (Ed.), 臺灣數學師資培育跨國研究 Taiwan TEDS-M 2008 (pp. 143–169). Taipei: Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University.Google Scholar
- Hsieh, F.-J. & Wang, T.-Y. (2012). 中學數學職前教師之數學知能 [Mathematics competence of future secondary mathematics teachers]. In F.-J. Hsieh (Ed.), 臺灣數學師資培育跨國研究 Taiwan TEDS-M 2008 (pp. 93–117). Taipei: Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University.Google Scholar
- Hsieh, F.-J., Wang, T.-Y., Hsieh, C.-J., Tang, S.-J., Chao, G.-H., & Law C.-K. (2010). A milestone of an international study in Taiwan teacher education—An international comparison of Taiwan mathematics teacher (Taiwan TEDS-M 2008). Retrieved from http://tedsm.math.ntnu.edu.tw/eng/result.htm.
- Hsieh, F.-J., Wu, P.-C., & Wang, T.-Y. (2013). MCK and MPCK of primary and lower secondary teachers at the end of teacher education in Taiwan: Hot topics and pressing issues. In S. Blömeke, F.-J. Hsieh, G. Kaiser, & W. H. Schmidt (Eds.), Teacher knowledge, teacher beliefs and opportunities to learn in 16 countries—Findings from the IEA TEDS-M study on primary and lower secondary teacher education. New York: Springer. (In press)Google Scholar
- McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Latent class analysis (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, no. 07-064). Newberry Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- McDonnell, L. M. (1995). Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 305–322.Google Scholar
- Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y. & Preuschoff, C. (2009). TIMSS 2011 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.Google Scholar
- Muthén, B. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–33). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Muthén, B., Huang, L.-C., Jo, B., Khoo, S.-T., Goff, G. N., Novak, J. R. & Shih, J. C. (1995). Opportunity-to-learn effects on achievement: Analytical aspects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 371–403.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, W. H., Blömeke, S., Tatto, M. T., Hsieh, F.-J., Cogan, L., Houang, R. T. & Schwille, J. (2011a). Teacher education matters: A study of middle school mathematics teacher preparation in six countries. New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, W. H., Houang, R. T., Cogan, L., Blömeke, S., Tatto, M. T., Hsieh, F.-J. & Paine, L. (2008). Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers: Its structure and how it varies across six countries. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(5), 735–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Rowley, G., Peck, R. & Holdgreve-Resendez, R. (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries. Amsterdam: Multicopy.Google Scholar