The benefits of connecting school students with scientists are well documented. This paper reports how New Zealand teachers brought scientists into the classrooms through the use of videos of New Zealand scientists talking about themselves and their research. Two researchers observed lessons in 9 different classrooms in which 23 educational videos were shown to students from years 2 to 11 (aged 6–17 years). Seven groups of primary students and 4 groups of secondary students participated in interviews after classroom observations. Eight additional secondary teachers participated in 7 focus group discussions; 4 additional primary teachers participated in 1 focus group discussion. Data were analysed thematically using an inductive approach. This analysis uncovered 4 major functions for the use of videos of scientists talking about their work: bringing scientists into the classroom, scientists talking about science with local relevance, scientists explaining concepts using a multitude of modes and scientists as authentic alternative authorities within the classroom. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that the use of video clips of scientists talking about their work can be an effective and efficient way of engaging students in learning about science and scientists.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aikenhead, G., Orpwood, G. & Fensham, P. (2011). Scientific literacy for a knowledge society. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, D. Roberts, P. O. Wickman, G. Erickson & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 28–44). New York, NY: Routledge.
Barak, M. & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Science education in primary schools: Is an animation worth a thousand pictures? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 608–620.
Bolstad, R. & Hipkins, R. (2008). Seeing yourself in science—The importance of the middle school years. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Braund, M. & Reiss, M. (2006). Validity and worth in the science curriculum: Learning school science outside the laboratory. Curriculum Journal, 17(3), 213–228.
Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P. & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458.
Brunvand, S. & Fishman, B. (2007). Investigating the impact of the availability of scaffolds on pre-service teacher noticing and learning. Video Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(2), 151–174.
Chen, J., Cowie, B. & Oliver, K. (2011). Reading to learn about New Zealand birds in a primary science classroom. New Zealand Science Teacher, 129, 31–33.
Chen, J., & Cowie, B. (2012). A butterfly story: Being a citizen scientist. New Zealand ScienceTeacher, 130, 34–37.
Cooper, B., Cowie, B. & Jones, A. (2010). Connecting teachers and students with science and scientists: The Science Leaning Hub. Science Education International, 21(2), 92–101.
Creswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–131.
Davis, E., Beyer, C., Forbes, C. & Stevens, S. (2011). Understanding pedagogical design capacity through teachers’ narratives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 797–810.
Demirba, M. (2009). The relationships between the scientist perception and scientific attitudes of science teacher candidates in Turkey: A case study. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(6), 565–576.
Dixon, P. & Wilke, R. (2007). The influence of a teacher research experience on elementary teachers’ thinking and instruction. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 19, 25–43.
Eccles, J. (2005). Why women shy away from careers in science and math. Retrieved from http://www.umich.edu/news/index.html?Releases/2005/Apr05/r041405. Accessed 2 Aug 2012.
Elster, D. (2009). Biology in context: Teachers’ professional development in learning communities. Journal of Biological Education, 43(2), 53–61.
Falloon, G. & Trewern, A. (2013). Developing school–scientist partnerships: Lessons for scientists from Forests-of-Life. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 11–24.
Fasse, B. B. & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Evaluating classroom practices using qualitative methods: Defining and refining the process. Paper presented at the International Conference of Learning Sciences, Australia.
Feldman, A., Divoll, K. & Rogan, A. (2007). Research education of new scientists: Implications for science teacher education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Fensham, P. (2009). Teaching science to achieve scientific literacy. In R. Bybee & B. McCrae (Eds.), OISA science 2006: Implications for science teachers and teaching (pp. 187–202). New Orleans, USA: National Science Teachers Association.
France, B. & Bay, J. L. (2010). Questions students ask: Bridging the gap between scientists and students in a research institute classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 173–194.
Gluckman, P. (2011). Looking ahead: Science education for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.pmcsa.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/Looking-ahead-Science-education-for-the-twenty-first-century.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2012.
Harlen, W. (2008). Science as a key component of the primary curriculum: A rationale with policy implications. Retrieved from http://wellcome.ac.uk/perspectives. Accessed 2 Aug 2012.
Hoffler, T. N. & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738.
Hughes, R., Molyneaux, K. & Dixon, P. (2012). The role of scientist mentors on teachers’ perceptions of the community of science during a summer research experience. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 915–941.
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267.
Kearney, M. (2002). Using digital video to enhance authentic technology-mediated learning in science classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Council for Computers in Education, Hobart, Australia.
Kelly, K. & Brown, C. (2003). Communicative demands of learning science through technological design: Third grade students’ construction of solar energy devices. Linguistics and Education, 13, 483–501.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J. & Tsatsarelius, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetoric of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
Laursen, S., Liston, C., Thiry, H. & Graf, J. (2007). What good is a scientist in the classroom? Participant outcomes and program design features for a short-duration science outreach intervention in K-12 classrooms. CBE Life Sciences education, 6(1), 49–64.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Ministry of Education (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
Moreland, J., Cowie, B., Otrel-Cass, K. & Jones, A. (2010). Planning for learning: Building knowledge for teaching primary science and technology. Wellington, New Zealand: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative.
Morrison, J. A. & Estes, J. C. (2007). Using scientists and real-world scenarios in professional development for middle school science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(2), 165–184.
Olympiou, G. & Zacharia, Z. (2012). Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students’ conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation. Science Education, 96, 21–47.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Volume 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD.
Osborne, J. & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pop, M. M., Dixon, P. & Grove, C. (2010). Research experiences for teachers (RET): Motivation, expectation, and changes to teaching practices due to professional program involvement. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 127–147.
Quellmalz, E. S., Timms, M. J., Silberglitt, M. D. & Buckley, B. C. (2012). Science assessments for all: Integrating science simulations into balanced state science assessment systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 363–393.
Rennie, L. J. (2012). A very valuable partnership: Evaluation of the Scientists in Schools Project 2011–12. Dickson, ACT: CSIRO Education.
Scherz, Z. & Oren, M. (2006). How to change students’ images of science and technology. Science Education, 90(6), 965–985.
Schibeci, R. & Lee, L. (2003). Portrayals of science and scientists, and “science for citizenship”. Research in Science and Technological Education, 21(2), 177–192.
Scott, P., Mortimer, E. & Ametller, J. (2011). Pedagogical link-making: A fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 3–36.
Sharkawy, A. (2012). Exploring the potential of using stories about diverse scientists and reflective activities to enrich primary students’ images of scientists and scientific work. Culture Studies of Science Education, 7, 307–340. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9386-2.
Tabak, I. (2004). Reconstructing context: Negotiating the tension between exogenous and endogenous educational design. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 225–233.
Tversky, B. & Morrison, J. B. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 57(40), 247–262.
Tytler, R., Osborne, J. F., Williams, G., Tytler, K. & Clark, C. J. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the school transition. Canberra: Commissioned by the Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
Wong, S. L. & Hodson, D. (2009). From the horse’s mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93, 109–130.
Wormstead, S. J., Becker, M. L. & Congalton, R. G. (2002). Tools for successful student–teacher–scientist partnerships. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(3), 277–287.
Yarden, H. & Yarden, A. (2011). Studying biotechnological methods using animations: The teacher’s role. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 689–702.
Ziedler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L. & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socio-scientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357–377.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Cowie, B. SCIENTISTS TALKING TO STUDENTS THROUGH VIDEOS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 12, 445–465 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9415-y
- classroom research
- educational technology
- image of scientist
- science education