Anderson-Rowland, M. R., Banks, D. L., Zerby, D. M. & Chain, E. A. (2005, October). Evaluating a collaborative program to increase the enrollment and retention of community college transfer students. Paper presented at the 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
Andrée, M. & Hansson, L. (2013). Marketing the ‘Broad Line’: Invitations to STEM education in a Swedish recruitment campaign. International Journal of Science Education, 35(1), 147–166. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.695880.
Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181–185.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77.
Buck, G. A., Clark, V. L., Leslie-Pelecky, D., Lu, Y. & Cerda-Lizarraga, P. (2008). Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach. Science Education, 92(4), 688–707.
Bøe, M. V. (2012). Science choices in Norwegian upper secondary school: What matters? Science Education, 96(1), 1–20. doi:10.1002/sce.20461.
Bøe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., Lyons, T. & Schreiner, C. (2011). Participation in science and technology: Young people’s achievement-related choices in late modern societies. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 37–71.
Cantrell, P. & Ewing-Taylor, J. (2009). Exploring STEM career options through collaborative high school seminars. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 295–303.
Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 471–486.
Cummins, R. A. & Gullone, E. (2000). Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, Singapore.
Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J. T., Miller-Friedmann, J. L., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M. & Hazari, Z. (2011). Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 63–79. doi:10.1080/21548455.2011.629455.
DeWitt, J., Archer, L., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B. & Wong, B. (2011). High aspirations but low progression: The science aspirations–careers paradox amongst minority ethnic students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 243–271. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9245-0.
Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L. & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviours. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives. Psychological and sociological approaches. San Francisco: W. H. Friedman & Co.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S. & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility–value intervention. Psychological Science, 23(8), 899–906. doi:10.1177/0956797611435530.
Hattie, J. (Ed.). (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M. & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003.
Holmegaard, H. T. (2012). The process of choosing what to study: A longitudinal study of upper secondary students’ identity work when choosing higher education. Accepted for publication 21.02.2012 in Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research.
Hyde, J. S. & Linn, M. C. (2006). DIVERSITY: Enhanced: Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science, 314(5799), 599–600. doi:10.1126/science.1132154.
Jensen, F. & Bøe, M. V. (2013). A Norwegian 2-day recruitment event’s influence on upper secondary female students’ STEM motivations. Manuscript in progress.
Jussim, L. & Osgood, D. W. (1989). Influence and similarity among friends: An integrative model applied to incarcerated adolescents. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(2), 98–112.
Kjærnsli, M., Lie, S., Olsen, R. V. & Roe, A. (Eds.). (2007). Tid for tunge løft. Norske elevers kompetanse i naturfag, lesing og matematikk i PISA 2006. [Time for heavy lifting. Norwegian students’ competence in science, reading, and mathematics in PISA 2006]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Kjærnsli, M. & Roe, A. (Eds.). (2010). På rett spor. Norske elevers kompetanse i lesing, matematikk og naturfag i PISA 2009 [On the right track. Norwegian students competencies in reading, mathematics and science in PISA 2009]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Krapp, A. & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518645.
Krueger, R. A. (Ed.). (1998). Analyzing & reporting focus group results, vol. 6. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Larson, R. W. & Verma, S. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 701–736. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.701.
Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591–613.
Lyons, T. & Quinn, F. (2010). Choosing science. Understanding the declines in senior high school science enrolments (I. a. M. E. f. R. a. r. A. National Centre of Science, Trans.). Armidale: University of New England.
Ministry of Education and Research (2010). Realfag for framtida. Strategi for styrking av realfagene 2010–2014 [STEM for the future. Strategy for strengthening the STEM disciplines 2010–2014.]. In M. o. e. a. research (Ed.). Oslo, Norway.
National Research Council (2009). In P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A. W. Shouse & M. A. Feder (Eds.), Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington: National Academies Press.
OECD (2008). Education at a glance 2008 OECD Indicators: OECD.
Osborne, J. & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: King’s College.
Osborne, J., Simon, S. & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.
Osborne, J., Simon, S. & Tytler, R. (2009). Attitudes towards science: An update. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California.
Robson, C. (Ed.). (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Schreiner, C. (2006). Exploring a ROSE-garden. Norwegian youth’s orientations towards science–seen as signs of late modern identities. Doctor Scientarium, University of Oslo, Oslo.
Schreiner, C., Henriksen, E. K., Sjaastad, J., Jensen, F. & Løken, M. (2010). Vilje-con-valg: valg og bortvalg av realfag [Choosing—or not choosing—STEM higher education in Norway]. KIMEN, 2010(2), 1–107.
Sjaastad, J. (2011). Sources of inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people’s choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1615–1636. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.590543.
Sjaastad, J. (2012). Measuring the ways significant persons influence attitudes towards science and mathematics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 192–212. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.672775.
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M. (Eds.). (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
Swimmer, F. & Jarratt-Ziemski, K. (2007). Intersections between science & engineering education and recruitment of female and Native American students. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual conference & exposition, Honolulu, HI.
Taconis, R. & Kessels, U. (2009). How choosing science depends on students’ individual fit to “science culture”. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1115–1132.
The RENATE Centre (2011). The ENTER project—English summary retrieved 01.06.2011, from http://renatesenteret.no/content/1142/In-English.
UNESCO. (2010). Engineering: Issues, challenges and opportunities for development. Paris: UNESCO.
Vollstedt, A.-M. & Wang, E. L. (2006). Adressing low enrollment in engineering schools using the segway HT as a recruitment tool. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Engineering Education, San Juan, PR.
Woolston, D. C., Zaki, E. & Winter, C. J. (1997). The effectiveness of freshman recruiting strategies: An analysis at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference: Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change, Pittsburgh, PA.
Yore, L. D. (2011). Foundations of scientific, mathematical, and technological literacies—common themes and theoretical frameworks. In L. D. Yore, E. V. d. Flier-Keller, D. W. Blades, T. W. Pelton & D. B. Zandvliet (Eds.), Pacific CRYSTAL centre for science, mathematics, and technology literacy: Lessons learned (pp. 23–44). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Zeldin, A., Britner, S. & Pajares, F. (2008). A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1036–1058.