Advertisement

EXPLORING INDIVIDUAL AND SCHOOL-RELATED FACTORS AND ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY: COMPARING U.S. AND CANADA USING PISA 2006

  • Emily LinEmail author
  • Qingmin Shi
Article

Abstract

Questions remain about how to best prepare students to be environmentally literate. Although Canada and U.S. share similarities in education systems, diversity in student population, and historical roots in formalizing environmental education, Canada is one of the top performing countries in international science assessments while U.S. matches average performing countries. This study examined the relationship of individual and school-related factors to environmental literacy by comparing students’ performances in knowledge, awareness, attitudes, and behavior about environmental issues between U.S. and Canada using PISA 2006. Findings suggest that knowledge, awareness, attitudes, and behavior are inter-related, and development of certain domains of environmental literacy may be enhanced by classroom student investigations. Prior explanations for U.S. lower performance in environmental literacy cannot be attributed only to low socio-economic status and student diversity.

Key words

attitudes environmental literacy international comparisons large-scale studies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bates, G. R. (1978). The role of laboratory in secondary school science programs. In M. B. Rowe (Ed.), What research says to the science teacher. Washington, DC: National science Teachers Association.Google Scholar
  2. Beese, J. & Liang, X. (2010). Do resources matter? PISA science achievement comparisons between students in the United States, Canada and Finland. Improving Schools, 13(3), 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bybee, R. W. (2008). Scientific literacy, environmental issues, and PISA 2006: The 2008 Paul F-Brandwein lecture. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 566–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) (2011). Annual report to parliament 2011. Ottawa, ON: Author.Google Scholar
  5. Cook, S. & Berrenberg, J. L. (1981). Approaches to encouraging conservation behavior: A review and conceptual framework. Journal of Social Issues, 37(2), 73–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Couertjens, L., Boeve-De Pauw, J., De Maeyer, S. & van Petegem, P. (2010). Do schools make a difference in their students’ environmental attitudes and awareness? Evidence from PISA 2006. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 497–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeChano, L. M. (2006). A multi-country examination of the relationship between environmental knowledge and attitudes. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DiEnno, C. M. & Hilton, S. C. (2005). High school students’ knowledge, attitudes, and levels of enjoyment of an environmental education unit on nonnative plants. Journal of Environmental Education, 37(1), 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eagles, F. J. & Demare, R. (1999). Factors influencing children’s environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4), 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibson, H. L., & Van Strat, G. A. (2001). A longitudinal study of the impact of constructivist instructional methods on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward teaching and learning mathematics and science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
  11. Haberman, J. (2006). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18, 45–62.Google Scholar
  12. Hart, P. (1994). Recent developments in environmental education in Canada—Local initiative with international implications. In R. Mrazek (Ed.), Pathways to partnerships: Coalitions for environmental education: Selected papers from the annual conference of North American association for environmental education (pp. 126–128). Troy: North American Association for Environmental Education.Google Scholar
  13. Hart, P. (2007). Environmental education. In S.K., Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.). Handbook on research on science education (pp. 689–726). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Pub.Google Scholar
  14. Harvey, G. (1977). A conceptualization of EE. In J. Aldrich, A. Blackburn & G. Abel (Eds.), A report on the North American regional seminar on environmental education (pp. 66–72). Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.Google Scholar
  15. Hoftstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang, H. P. & Yore, L. D. (2003). A comparative study of Canadian and Taiwanese grade 5 children’s environmental behaviors, attitudes, concerns, emotional dispositions, and knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 419–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hungerford, H. R. & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iozzi, L. A. (1989). What research says to the educator: Environmental education and affective domain. The Journal of Environmental Education, 20(3–4), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirschner, P., Sweller, J. & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kollmus, A. & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lazarowitz, R. & Tamir, P. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 94–130). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Lester, B. T., Ma, L., Lee, O. & Lambert, J. (2006). Social activism in elementary science education: A science, technology, and society approach to teach global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liang, L. L. & Gabel, D. L. (2005). Effectiveness of a constructivist approach to science instruction for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1143–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin, E. (2000). Environmental education in pre-service teacher training programs in Canadian tertiary institutions (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  26. Lin, E. (2002). Trends of environmental education in Canadian pre-service teacher education programs from 1979 to 1996. The Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7(1), 199–215.Google Scholar
  27. Lipsey, M. (1977). Personal antecedents and consequences of ecologically responsible behavior: A review. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 7(4), 70.Google Scholar
  28. Littledyke, M. (2008). Science education for environmental awareness: Approaches to integrating cognitive and affective domains. Environmental Education Research, 14, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lucas, A. M. (1979). Environment and environmental education: Conceptual issues and curriculum implications. Melbourne: Australian international Press & Pub.Google Scholar
  30. Marcinkowski, T. (2001). Predictors of responsible environmental behavior: A review of three dissertation studies. In H. Hungerford, W. Bluhm, T. Volk & J. Ramsey (Eds.), Essential readings in environmental education (pp. 247–276). Champaign: Stipes Publishing, L.L.C.Google Scholar
  31. McInnis, N. (1972). You are an environment. Evanston: Centre for Curriculum Design.Google Scholar
  32. National Academy of Science (NAS). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  33. North American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE) (2011). Developing a framework for environmental literacy. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007). PISA 2006: Science competences for tomorrow’s world, vol.1: Analysis. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009). Green at fifteen? How 15-year-olds perform in environmental science and geoscience in PISA. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  36. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States, strong performers and successful reformers in education. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en
  37. Pemberton, D. A. (1989). Definitional problems for environmental education and geographic education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rehorek, S. J. (2004). Inquiry-based teaching: An example of descriptive science in action. The American Biology Teacher, 66(7), 493–499.Google Scholar
  40. Romberg, T. A. (1999). School mathematics: The impact of international comparisons on national policy. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna & L. Huntley (Eds.), International comparison in mathematics education (pp. 189–199). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  41. Roth, C. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution, and directions in the 1990s. Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC.Google Scholar
  42. Rumberger, R. W. & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Does resegregation matter? The impact of social composition on academic achievement in Southern high schools. In J. C. Boger & G. Orfield (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 127–147). Chapel Hill: The University of Northern Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  43. Schreen, J. (1993). Basic school effectiveness research: Items for a research agenda. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 4(1), 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schreiner, C. & Sjoberg, S. (2004). The relevance of science education. Science Education, 63(2), 245–255.Google Scholar
  45. Schultz, P. W., Oskamp, S. & Mainieri, T. (1995). Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(2), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stamp, N. & O’Brien, T. (2005). GK-12 partnership: A model to advance change in science education. BioScience, 55(1), 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. The Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Studebaker, P. (1973). The justification of environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 4(4), 48.Google Scholar
  49. Tilbury, D. (1994). An international development of environmental education: A basis for a teacher education model? International Journal of Environmental Education and Information, 13(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  50. Tobin, K. G. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Troy, T. D. & Schwaab, K. E. (1982). A decade of environmental education. School Science and Mathematics, 82(3), 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2007). The UN decade of education for sustainable development (DESD 2005-2014): The first two years. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  53. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilke, R. (Ed.). (1995). Environmental education literacy/needs assessment project: Assessing environmental literacy of students and environmental education needs of teachers. Final report for 1993-1995 (pp. 5-6). Stevens Point: University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point.Google Scholar
  55. Wright, J. M. (2008). The comparative effects of constructivist versus traditional teaching methods on the environmental literacy of postsecondary nonscience majors. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(4), 324–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zelezny, L. (1999). Educational interventions that improve environmental behaviors: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Nevada-Las VegasLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations